I pushed r22 up to redmine.

This has all review comments by M. Westhead thusfar incorporated.

I pushed up an HTML version which has change tracking so the text changes are all visible in gory detail (which is pretty bad given that big sections moved around)

I pushed up the MS-Word master.

I pushed up a PDF with "simple markup" of changes.

All of these have some artifacts of change tracking in them - things that won't look right until the changes get accepted.

NOTE: The Errata-related changes were all accepted for post revision r12, so this r22 spin is really about the edit-driven changes from M.Westhead review, and improving the flow and organization based upon that.

If you want a DFDL spec that still has all the same sections and section ordering as the prior official draft, but with the errata applied (with change tracking) then you want revision r12, which is also on redmine.