Agreed that the SMH responses to Mike's
comments would be adopted.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
----- Forwarded by Steve
Hanson/UK/IBM on 13/08/2013 17:14 -----
From:
Steve Hanson/UK/IBM
To:
Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>,
Cc:
Tim Kimber/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Date:
12/08/2013 15:48
Subject:
Re: Clarification
needed on changes to Erratum 2.121 in Errata doc draft r14.0
Mike - clarifications below.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From:
Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To:
Tim Kimber/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
Steve Hanson/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
Date:
10/08/2013 15:26
Subject:
Clarification
needed on changes to Erratum 2.121 in Errata doc draft r14.0
There have been changes in r14 to erratum 2.121. Some
things are ambiguous. Clarifications needed are noted below.
• Add support for new ‘x’ and ‘X’
symbols.
Just single 'x' and
'X', or all variations, i.e., x, xx, xxx, xxxx, and xxxxx, and X, XX, XXX,
XXXX, and XXXXX ?
SMH:
Intention was all variations of 'x' and 'X'.
• Add support for new ‘o’ and ‘O’
symbols
Don't see 'o' only
'O' on the reference web page given. Is this correct?
SMH: My
mistake. Should be all variations of 'O'.
• Adopt revised semantic for the ‘V’
symbol when used as ‘V’ and ‘VVVV’
To confirm, we don't
allow 'VV' or 'VVV'. Only single V, and VVVV.
SMH:
We may as well allow all variations of 'V'.
--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU