Tim I think you are right - it should just be 'x'.

Regards

Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848

From: Tim Kimber/UK/IBM@IBMGB
To: dfdl-wg@ogf.org,
Date: 20/06/2013 14:19
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] proposal: functions to allow reasonable syntax for hex constants in DFDL expression language
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org

Interesting...that never occurred to me. I have always considered the # to be a qualifier on the XML character reference entity.
In XML, the carriage-return character can be specified in any of the following ways:
&cr; - A named entity
 - A numeric entity ( starts with '#' )
 - A numeric entity in base 16 ( the numeric part starts with 'x' )

So the '#' character is signalling that the entity is a numeric entity. But there's no need for that to be signalled in this case - the parameter for these integer constructors will always be a number.
On that basis, the prefix should be 'x'. I would prefer that to '#x' on the grounds of readability.

regards,

Tim Kimber, DFDL Team,
Hursley, UK
Internet: kimbert@uk.ibm.com
Tel. 01962-816742
Internal tel. 37246742

From: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM
To: Tim Kimber/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
Cc: dfdl-wg@ogf.org, dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
Date: 20/06/2013 14:01
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] proposal: functions to allow reasonable syntax for hex constants in DFDL expression language

I was thinking along the same lines as Tim.

I'd prefer the hex string to start with '#x' for consistency with DFDL hex entity syntax.

Regards

Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848

From: Tim Kimber/UK/IBM@IBMGB
To: dfdl-wg@ogf.org,
Date: 20/06/2013 09:44
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] proposal: functions to allow reasonable syntax for hex constants in DFDL expression language
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org

As an alternative, we could
- drop the 'h' prefix
- use the same names as the XPath integer constructors, including the use of the full name for unsigned variants ( e.g. 'dfdl:unsignedInt' )
- behave exactly like xs:byte / xs:short etc when the string does not begin with '0x'

The only difference would be the namespace of the function. So the modeller would use the dfdl variant if they needed the '0x' notation, and they could choose to use the dfdl variant always when constructing integers from string literals.

regards,

Tim Kimber, DFDL Team,
Hursley, UK
Internet: kimbert@uk.ibm.com
Tel. 01962-816742
Internal tel. 37246742

From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To: dfdl-wg@ogf.org,
Date: 19/06/2013 23:28
Subject: [DFDL-WG] proposal: functions to allow reasonable syntax for hex constants in DFDL expression language
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org

Rationale: in writing DFDL schemas for binary data formats, there is a strong need to express binary data constants in hexadecimal.

Proposed new functions:

dfdl:hByte
dfdl:hUByte
dfdl:hShort
dfdl:hUShort
dfdl:hInt
dfdl:hUInt
dfdl:hLong
dfdl:hULong

The prefix 'h' is a reminder that the function converts from hexadecimal. The prefix 'U' on the name denotes that the function creates an unsigned type result. Normally one might like to write this out fully, but in this case brevity is helpful given the expected usage of these functions to construct literal constants in DFDL expressions.

All the functions take a single string argument. The string must begin with "0x" and contain at least one hex digit after that.
The string must contain only hexadecimal digits, that is, the characters 0-9a-zA-Z. It is a schema definition error otherwise.

The hex digits represent a big endian twos complement representation of a binary number.
Each function has a limit on the number of hex digits, with no more digits than 2, 4, 8, or 16 for the byte, short, int, and long versions. That is to say for dfdl:byte and dfdl:uByte, there can be at most 2 hex digits. For dfdl:short and dfdl:uShort, there can be at most 4 hex digits, and so on. It is a schema definition error if more digits are encountered than are suitable for the type being created.

Examples:

dfdl:hUInt("0xa1b2c3d4") is the value 2712847316. Note that in the first byte 'a1' the most significant bit is set, but since this is an unsigned type, this is not interpreted as a sign bit.
dfdl:hInt("0xFFFFFFFF") is the int value -1. The sign bit indicates that the number is negative, and this twos complement value represents -1.
dfdl:hUByte("0xFF") is the unsigned byte value 255
dfdl:hByte("0xff") is the byte value -1.
dfdl:hByte("0x7F") is the byte value 127
dfdl:hByte("0x80") is the byte value -128
dfdl:hUByte("0x80") is the unsigned byte value 128
dfdl:hByte("0x0A3") is a schema definition error as the leading zero is not allowed because at most 2 digits are allowed for byte types.
dfdl:hShort("0x0A3") is short value 208. Leading zero causes no issue here because up to 4 digits are allowed.

Example of usage in expressions:

<xs:element name="magic_number" type="ex:uint32"
dfdl:byteOrder="bigEndian">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo source="http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/dfdl-1.0/">
<dfdl:setVariable ref="ex:bOrd">
{
if (xs:unsignedInt(.) eq dfdl:hUInt('0xa1b2c3d4')) then 'bigEndian'
else if (xs:unsignedInt(.) eq dfdl:hUInt('0xd4c3b2a1')) then 'littleEndian'
else fn:error(ex:magic_number, "Magic number was not 0xA1B2C3D4 (for bigEndian) or 0xD4C3B2A1 (for littleEndian).")
}
</dfdl:setVariable>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>

--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com-- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU-- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.orghttps://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU-- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU