On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Steve Hanson
<smh@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Errata 2.90. Sections 12.3, 12.3.7.2.
Additionally allow lengthUnits 'bits' to apply to binary signed integer
types, to support the modeling of signed integer bit fields in the C language.
The physical bits are interpreted as a two's complement integer.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From:
Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To:
dfdl-wg@ogf.org,
Date:
10/12/2012 21:42
Subject:
[DFDL-WG] needed:
signed bit fields
Sent by:
dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
current DFDL v1.0 spec says bit fields are all unsigned integers up to
length 64.
I am modeling data that uses lots of twos-complement 24-bit long and other
length signed integers on various bit-boundaries.
Was there a reason to leave signed twos-complement out for bit fields (other
than perhaps just we thought we might get away with it?)
The only corner case I can think of is if you make a 1-bit wide signed
bit field. This should be a Schema Defintion Error I believe, because twos-complement
isn't defined unless you have at one sign bit, and at least 1 mantissa
bit.
...mikeb
--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL WG Co-Chair | Tresys Technologies
Tel: 781-330-0412
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU