You can't do that with one assert I'm afraid. The main issue is that a path location must always return exactly one item, so it's use within the context of an array must be in conjunction with a predicate, which must refer to a single instance.  That's what dfdl:occursIndex() is for.

To check that an array meets its bounds, you need a separate assert that uses the dfdl:count() function. You'd have to hard-code the min/max values, and place it on a containing object.

<sequence>
   <annotation><appinfo...>
      <dfdl:assert>{ dfdl:occursCount(./foo) ge 5 and dfdl:occursCount(./foo) le 10 }</dfdl:assert>
   </appinfo></annotation>
  <element name="foo" minOccurs="5" maxOccurs="10" dfdl:occursCountKind='parsed'>
     <annotation><appinfo...>
      <dfdl:assert>{ dfdl:checkConstraints(.[dfdl:occursIndex()]) }</dfdl:assert>
     </appinfo></annotation>
     <simpleType>
       <restriction base="xs:string">
        <pattern value="...some regex..."/>
       </restriction>
     </simpleType>
 </element>
</sequence>

I think that means our definition of dfdl:checkConstraints() in the spec is wrong. Table 34 and Section 5.2 together imply that minOccurs and maxOccurs are used in checkConstraints. I think that simply doesn't work. It should only be using 'fixed' and the facets (I think 'default' is pointless as well).

Worth noting that when a path is used in the context dfdl:occursCount(<path>) then it is not an error if more than one item is returned, and it should not be wrapped with fn:exactly-one().

Regards

Steve Hanson
Architect, Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848



From:        Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To:        dfdl-wg@ogf.org,
Date:        01/11/2012 16:45
Subject:        [DFDL-WG] clarification needed: assert evaluation order and arrays
Sent by:        dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org

---

Question: If I write

<element name="foo" minOccurs="5" maxOccurs="10" dfdl:occursCountKind='parsed'>
   <annotation><appinfo...>
      <dfdl:assert>{ dfdl:checkConstraints(.) }</dfdl:assert>
   </appinfo></annotation>
   <simpleType>
     <restriction base="xs:string">
        <pattern value="...some regex..."/>
     </restriction>
   </simpleType>
</element>

I have two sources of constraints. One is the pattern, the other the min/max occurs.

Does that one assertion calling dfdl:checkConstraints mean both will be checked?
That is, one check occurring as each element is parsed, and the other at the end of the array?

Assume I am not using any validation option, so the DFDL processor would not otherwise check the max/minOccurs because occursCountKind is parsed.

Will the checkConstraints fail as soon as we parse the 11th element (is it checking the min/max occurs for each element occurrence as it is parsed), or do we parse as many as we can, and fail only when we check and find out that the entire array has 36 elements that were successfully parsed?

What I would like the above to mean is this:

1) as each element occurrence is parsed we check the pattern and parse error (assertion failed) if there is no match.
2) Also after a successful parse of an occurrence, we check that the index is <=10, and parse-error (assertion failed) if not.
3) at the end of the array, we check that the number of occurrences is >= 5. If not we get a parse error (assertion failed).

Comments?





...mikeb

--
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL WG Co-Chair 
Tel:  781-330-0412
--
 dfdl-wg mailing list
 dfdl-wg@ogf.org
 https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU