I'm trying to simplify something in the nulls/defaults space.
There's this property proposed: useNullValueForDefault. This is a boolean.
I'm trying to understand what this is for.
On input, when the element is required but no content is found, and you
therefore want to create a default value, you would look, see that the
element is nillable, see that useNullValueForDefault is true, and set the
logical value of that element to null.
On output when no logical value is provided but the element is required,
you therefore want to create a default value, so you look and see that the
element is nillable and see that useNullValueForDefault is true and so you
provide the logical value null as the value. Then you output as if the
logical value was null in the first place, so you would output the first
of the dfdl:nullValues list as the representation.
These two are not symmetric.
I understand wanting empty content to cause null as the logical value of a
nillable element. Symmetry argues that one wants in this case for the
output side to output empty content as the representation of null logical
value.
The way I would express this is to provide a means for the list of
dfdl:nullValues to be able to contain the empty string as its first member
of the list. E.g., some syntax like:
dfdl:nullValues=" '' 'null' 'NULL' '\ ' "
Once you have this, there is no need for useNullValueForDefault. It's
functionality is subsumed by allowing nullValues to contain empty-string
as a null representation.
This leaves the case where an element is both nullable and has a non-null
default value.
Is this case important or can we just say that an element is either
nullable or has default values, but not both. We already have some
constraints on this stuff in that we don't allow nullable complex types,
only simple.
I believe allowing all combinations of nullability with default values is
probably overkill.
Comments?
I understand wanting a missing
Mike Beckerle
STSM, Architect, Scalable Computing
IBM Software Group
Information Platform and Solutions
Westborough, MA 01581
direct: voice and FAX 508-599-7148
assistant: Pam Riordan
priordan(a)us.ibm.com
508-599-7046
