The Surveillance State Quietly Lost a Major Court Case
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-surveillance-state-quietly-lost-a-major-court-case?source=email&via=desktop The Surveillance State Quietly Lost a Major Court Case The feds have a habit of rifling without a warrant through NSA data warehouses to find dirt on American citizens. An appeals court ruling may finally start to break the addiction.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 16:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell
An appeals court ruling may finally start to break the addiction.
lying bullshit
On Wednesday, December 25, 2019, 12:33:09 PM PST, Punk-Stasi 2.0
An appeals court ruling may finally start to break the addiction.
> lying bullshit I should mention that I didn't write the comment above, "An appeals court ruling..." Jim Bell
An appeals court ruling may finally start to break the addiction.
> lying bullshit
I should mention that I didn't write the comment above, "An appeals court ruling..."
For the record, I didn't accuse you of lying. The lies come from government and its mouthpiece, the journos, aka govcorp. In the real world govcorp will keep spying at will, regardless of what any of their own bullshit 'laws' say. The purpose of 'journalism' is to keep parroting the hilarious myth that the US is a 'democracy' and 'free society' governed by the 'rule of law' and similar infinitely idiotic nonsense.
On Wednesday, December 25, 2019, 01:31:49 PM PST, Punk-Stasi 2.0
An appeals court ruling may finally start to break the addiction.
lying bullshit
I should mention that I didn't write the comment above, "An appeals court ruling..."
For the record, I didn't accuse you of lying. The lies come from government and its mouthpiece, the journos, aka govcorp.
> In the real world govcorp will keep spying at will, regardless of what any of their own bullshit 'laws' say. > The purpose of 'journalism' is to keep parroting the hilarious myth that the US is a 'democracy' and 'free society' governed by the 'rule of law' and similar infinitely idiotic nonsense. Yes, I understood that. In this, as in many cases, I post articles from my smartphone, which doesn't make it easy to add my own comments, at least if they are long. That is why I frequently add a short comment saying, "Jim Bell's comment:". When I read the material I'd posted once it appeared on CP, even before your own comment, I realized that it was ambiguous as to who wrote "An appeals court ruling..." Jim Bell
participants (2)
-
jim bell -
Punk-Stasi 2.0