Perhaps the only simple fix is to expand access to enable private prosecutions so the rich and politically powerful, government employees (especially in intelligence and law enforcement) can be equally targeted. On Wed, Dec 18, 2019, 12:16 AM grarpamp wrote:

On 12/17/19, Ryan Carboni wrote:

...

We have too many damn laws.

Creeps creeping...

...

I don't see how all these laws serve to protect anyone.

Laws cannot and do not protect anyone against original harm. This is proven by the very existance of prisons and the daily newsfeeds.

Only way to protect is to protect yourself, or bind yourself to proxy who will under terms of mutual exchange or charity.

Due to intentional conflict of interest in their favor, governments are not capable of acting as proxy or charity.

Very simple concepts that few understand.

On Sunday, December 22, 2019, 12:43:53 PM PST, grarpamp wrote: On 12/18/19, Steven Schear wrote:

Perhaps the only simple fix is to expand access to enable private prosecutions so the rich and politically powerful, government employees (especially in intelligence and law enforcement) can be equally targeted.

Search for something like 'private / citizen prosecutor', maybe even 'public / independant prosecutor', but 'special prosecutor' gets too many hits from news sites. Also check Black's law for terms and definitions. The concept exists, and seems like it had some usage in some places around the world long ago. It's certainly rarer and more shut out than even jury nullification. You might find a few books or something on its history somewhere. Post them here for people.

They are called "private prosecutions"   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_prosecution                     Jim Bell