opennic is safe ? - cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org - lists.ogf.org

newer
projection and externalization of...

opennic is safe ?

older
[MINISTRY] free speech crack down...

Yush Bhardwaj

28 Aug 2017 28 Aug '17

4:46 a.m.

Is this safe to use https://www.opennic.org/ and they also provide free domains which can be access only by using there nameservers. anyone have any idea about openic In reddit also posts are 2 years old Regards Yush Bhardwaj

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 505 bytes)

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

James A. Donald

28 Aug 28 Aug

10:22 p.m.

On 2017-08-28 12:46, Yush Bhardwaj wrote:

Is this safe to use https://www.opennic.org/

and they also provide free domains which can be access only by using there nameservers.

anyone have any idea about openic

At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis, and these days anyone who fits the Trump voter demographic is a nazi and therefore deserves a beating. If opennic is owned by enemies, you are not worse off.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

juan

11:31 p.m.

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote:

At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis,

how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called 'hidden' services?

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

cypherpunks

29 Aug 29 Aug

12:50 a.m.

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote:

...
At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis,

how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called 'hidden' services?

Probably he means cloudfare blocked the nazis, since with Tor you cannot (in theory) block .onions up to now, just try to discover the real location and seize the servers. thats what the 3 or 4 letter agencies around world are doing for quite some time. does anybody has any more info on this opennic? does they ever blocked any content?

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

James A. Donald

2:40 a.m.

On 2017-08-29 07:31, juan wrote:

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote:

...
At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis,

how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called 'hidden' services?

After Stormfront was shut down, it was recreated on a tor hidden service, which was then throttled down to unusuability.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Zenaan Harkness

3:27 a.m.

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40:05AM +0800, James A. Donald wrote:

On 2017-08-29 07:31, juan wrote:

...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote:

...
At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis,

how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called 'hidden' services?

After Stormfront was shut down, it was recreated on a tor hidden service, which was then throttled down to unusuability.

It is possible that Weev does not actually know that it takes at least a few days, and really a few weeks, to build up a Tor-network profile whereby other nodes and willing to accept significant traffic from the new node - this is my understanding of how Tor relays work. It is of course also possible that there is an intended and targetted clampdown on TDS. But the first step is to grok how Tor works, and eliminate such a possibility. Ultimately, Tor has a crippled TCP underlying protocol/comms layer - a new UDP (or even lower) protocol layer is ultimately needed so that a free speech network becomes a proper switched network. But that's another of those things that Tor "strangely" keeps failing to get funding for...

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Zenaan Harkness

6:17 a.m.

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:27:25PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40:05AM +0800, James A. Donald wrote:

...
On 2017-08-29 07:31, juan wrote:

...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote:

...
At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing, but block nazis,

how does tor 'block nazis'? are you talking about so called 'hidden' services?

After Stormfront was shut down, it was recreated on a tor hidden service, which was then throttled down to unusuability.

It is possible that Weev does not actually know that it takes at least a few days, and really a few weeks, to build up a Tor-network profile whereby other nodes and willing to accept significant traffic from the new node - this is my understanding of how Tor relays work.

It is of course also possible that there is an intended and targetted clampdown on TDS.

But the first step is to grok how Tor works, and eliminate such a possibility.

Ultimately, Tor has a crippled TCP underlying protocol/comms layer - a new UDP (or even lower) protocol layer is ultimately needed so that a free speech network becomes a proper switched network. But that's another of those things that Tor "strangely" keeps failing to get funding for...

s/Weev/the admin for stormfront/

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

juan

1:18 a.m.

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:22:36 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote:

At present it is apparent that the regular name system is owned by enemies and Tor is owned by enemies - Tor would not block child porn, they would not block drug dealing,

by the way, age of consent 'laws' and drug 'laws' are totalitarian garbage, and their supporters are the enemy.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

2594

Age (days ago)

2595

Last active (days ago)

Download

7 comments

5 participants

tags

participants (5)

cypherpunks
James A. Donald
juan
Yush Bhardwaj
Zenaan Harkness