Razer's occam - free speech and the rhetoric of "politically correct" censorship
Free speech may be banned by any mega corporation, because they are a private for-profit company and can therefore do whatever they want. Oh, sorry, Google is a --public-- for profit company, is a near monopoly, and can therefore do whatever it wants. Because banning a competing communication platform which has no agenda per-se other than to enable the free speech that for example is being trampled on by Google, is OK when you slander that platform with something like: Google: this is an App already! and this app "Advocates against groups of people" Really? One of those never gonna present a fact "Razer" moments evidently, but this time from a global near-monopoly behemoth for profit "public" company, which has all sorts of statutory privileges by virtue of its statutory nature - almost an arm of the government. Alright, Google is an arm of the US Government, effectively, clandestinely, and ultimately quite publicly, as essentially every USA corporation is. Google - where slander is ok when it's from Google, and also when Google's slander is against an App and not against a human. Lauren "Kangz Rule" Weinstein is sounding more like Razer by the day... Way to go Lauren, celebrating slander, suppression of free speech, and the dictatorial rights of public mega-corporations - you're a real peoples man hey? Sincerely, Zenaan ----- Forwarded message from "PFKR" (People For Kangz) ----- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:19:37 -0700 Subject: [ PFKR ] Alt-social network Gab booted from Google Play Store for hate speech Alt-social network Gab booted from Google Play Store for hate speech https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/17/alt-social-network-gab-booted-from-google-... Gab, the conservative social network that has acted as a haven for people banned from the usual platforms, has been removed from the Google Play Store for violating the company's hate speech policy, the company announced on Twitter. Apple removed it from the App Store in June for similar reasons. That policy is pretty straightforward: "We don't allow apps that advocate against groups of people based on their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity." - - - Bravo! --Lauren-- Lauren Kangzstein (lauren@kangz.com): https://www.kangz.com/TheKang ----- End forwarded message -----
Google's slanderous lie turns into "blinking innocence" assertion that all apps must "adequately censor", sorry I mean "adequately moderate" their users, notwithstanding that Twitter and other apps do not satisfy the same test. Google's evil on the record: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/08/18/2021220/google-explains-why-it-banne... Google, the "See no evil" Kangz. Warning: unredacted email below misspells, misnames and misrepresents "Lauren Kangztein". If naughty, naughty words offend you, You should be very pleased with Google. Z On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:38:16AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Free speech may be banned by any mega corporation, because they are a private for-profit company and can therefore do whatever they want.
Oh, sorry, Google is a --public-- for profit company, is a near monopoly, and can therefore do whatever it wants.
Because banning a competing communication platform which has no agenda per-se other than to enable the free speech that for example is being trampled on by Google, is OK when you slander that platform with something like:
Google: this is an App already! and this app "Advocates against groups of people"
Really?
One of those never gonna present a fact "Razer" moments evidently, but this time from a global near-monopoly behemoth for profit "public" company, which has all sorts of statutory privileges by virtue of its statutory nature - almost an arm of the government. Alright, Google is an arm of the US Government, effectively, clandestinely, and ultimately quite publicly, as essentially every USA corporation is.
Google - where slander is ok when it's from Google, and also when Google's slander is against an App and not against a human.
Lauren "Kangz Rule" Weinstein is sounding more like Razer by the day...
Way to go Lauren, celebrating slander, suppression of free speech, and the dictatorial rights of public mega-corporations - you're a real peoples man hey?
Sincerely, Zenaan
----- Forwarded message from "PFKR" (People For Kangz) ----- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:19:37 -0700 Subject: [ PFKR ] Alt-social network Gab booted from Google Play Store for hate speech
Alt-social network Gab booted from Google Play Store for hate speech
https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/17/alt-social-network-gab-booted-from-google-...
Gab, the conservative social network that has acted as a haven for people banned from the usual platforms, has been removed from the Google Play Store for violating the company's hate speech policy, the company announced on Twitter. Apple removed it from the App Store in June for similar reasons. That policy is pretty straightforward: "We don't allow apps that advocate against groups of people based on their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity."
- - -
Bravo!
--Lauren-- Lauren Kangzstein (lauren@kangz.com): https://www.kangz.com/TheKang
----- End forwarded message -----
On 08/20/2017 04:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Google's slanderous lie turns into "blinking innocence" assertion that all apps must "adequately censor", sorry I mean "adequately moderate" their users, notwithstanding that Twitter and other apps do not satisfy the same test.
Ok... Let's use the alt-right infested "MindsDOTcom" as example. It's available on google play as a "Teen" app, but if one blocks pr0n or G0re accounts one still sees them in the 'groups' unless you individually mute the posts. Not "Adequately censored" to be considered a teen app. That's what you mean, right? Rr
Google's evil on the record:
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/08/18/2021220/google-explains-why-it-banne...
Google, the "See no evil" Kangz.
Warning: unredacted email below misspells, misnames and misrepresents "Lauren Kangztein".
If naughty, naughty words offend you, You should be very pleased with Google.
Z
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:38:16AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Free speech may be banned by any mega corporation, because they are a private for-profit company and can therefore do whatever they want.
Oh, sorry, Google is a --public-- for profit company, is a near monopoly, and can therefore do whatever it wants.
Because banning a competing communication platform which has no agenda per-se other than to enable the free speech that for example is being trampled on by Google, is OK when you slander that platform with something like:
Google: this is an App already! and this app "Advocates against groups of people"
Really?
One of those never gonna present a fact "Razer" moments evidently, but this time from a global near-monopoly behemoth for profit "public" company, which has all sorts of statutory privileges by virtue of its statutory nature - almost an arm of the government. Alright, Google is an arm of the US Government, effectively, clandestinely, and ultimately quite publicly, as essentially every USA corporation is.
Google - where slander is ok when it's from Google, and also when Google's slander is against an App and not against a human.
Lauren "Kangz Rule" Weinstein is sounding more like Razer by the day...
Way to go Lauren, celebrating slander, suppression of free speech, and the dictatorial rights of public mega-corporations - you're a real peoples man hey?
Sincerely, Zenaan
----- Forwarded message from "PFKR" (People For Kangz) ----- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:19:37 -0700 Subject: [ PFKR ] Alt-social network Gab booted from Google Play Store for hate speech
Alt-social network Gab booted from Google Play Store for hate speech
https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/17/alt-social-network-gab-booted-from-google-...
Gab, the conservative social network that has acted as a haven for people banned from the usual platforms, has been removed from the Google Play Store for violating the company's hate speech policy, the company announced on Twitter. Apple removed it from the App Store in June for similar reasons. That policy is pretty straightforward: "We don't allow apps that advocate against groups of people based on their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity."
- - -
Bravo!
--Lauren-- Lauren Kangzstein (lauren@kangz.com): https://www.kangz.com/TheKang
----- End forwarded message -----
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 05:39:14PM -0700, Razer wrote:
On 08/20/2017 04:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Google's slanderous lie turns into "blinking innocence" assertion that all apps must "adequately censor", sorry I mean "adequately moderate" their users, notwithstanding that Twitter and other apps do not satisfy the same test.
Ok... Let's use the alt-right infested "MindsDOTcom" as example. It's available on google play as a "Teen" app, but if one blocks pr0n or G0re accounts one still sees them in the 'groups' unless you individually mute the posts.
Not "Adequately censored" to be considered a teen app.
That's what you mean, right?
Rr
Razer, without the core strength to engage in an actual conversation. 1915 - 1938 must be pretty scary eh, Razer? I guess cowards do tend to be bullies in reaction to their cowardliness - even in the face of persistent and gentle suggestions to man up.
Those espousing, implementing, promoting, justifying this stuff always believe that these foundational tools of fascism will never be used against them personally, "because hey, I'm one of the good guys, right?" The Ministry marches forward ... Google and ProPublica Team Up To Build a National Hate Crime Database http://slashdot.us15.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=aab6529d3675bd877963a652d&id=74d3769340&e=053c85c6e4
participants (2)
-
Razer -
Zenaan Harkness