Due to inflation my opinion has increased in value from two to three cents. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/08/fighting-neo-nazis-future-free-express... This talk about free speech runs contrary to libertarian values about not having borders. Offending people is not protected by the non-aggression principle, and so the risk of people entering a space to experience undesired speech is too great a risk. As the number of rights expand, so must the number of freedoms decrease. It is too far to call the Daily Stormer vitriolic and abusive, it is clearly only in bad taste and puerile. For some reason after the Reagan administration, everyone became more puritan, and no one can even directly discuss any subject matter so I will say it: Calling anyone who died a fat slut is far outside civilized speech, and is certainly not something to be joked about in public. Yes, what GoDaddy, Google, and Cloudflare did was dangerous. So did what Obama did ( https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/02/documents-about-financial-censorship-u... ). Yes, it is terrible that states and malicious actors censors others through DDOS attacks, why are DDOS attacks ignored as speech? Those state owned computers should be blocked from the internet. I too agree with net neutrality and think "internet intermediaries" shouldn't make much content based decisions, outside of that needed to maintain service.