Just so long as the CEO of Cloudflare isnt the same guy who worked with the US DoD to set up Projwct Honeypot then we're all good right? oh, right.

Cloudflare handles at least 4% of web traffic according to their own marketing, thats pretty useful if you want to create a single place to collate details of someone's web activities across multie sites.

It's not as if many so-called activist or privacy protecting websites sit behind Cloudflare's protective shield though right? oh, right.

Cloudflare, Akamai et al are massive anti-privacy and anti-security services that put users safety at risk because the websites they cache are too cheap to do the job themselves.

What is also important is that the web caching services may have no legal responsibility to protect user data because there is no direct contract between them and the end user.

They are the greatest argument move the web to a distributed, encrypted model.



On 7 September 2016 18:37:32 GMT+01:00, Tom <tom@vondein.org> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:03:53AM -0700, Razer wrote:
They don't 'spy on random people on the twitters' schmuck.

Of course not, they just login to the database, honey.

CLoudflare keeps NEAR-REALTIME FULL COPIES OF WEBSITES with ALL UR
DATAZ. Every speck of it, and turns it over to DHS and PDs and Fusion
Centers on request b/c "National Security" and the FISA courts turned
down ZERO of the 4K plus requests received last year anyway.

Cloudflare caches content so they can serve it. Pretty standard job
like Akamai or Amazon do as well. And why would they "hand over website
content" to some agency? It's public.

Further, If you don't like my posting style or you're simply not
interested, and I can tell by you're failure to read any of it, fuck
off. Don't read my shit.

I don't care about your style. What I do care about is that your
"Cloudflare conspiracy" is utter nonsense. Posting more twitts and
calling me names doesn't make it more true. Like:

Also in the tweetstream, another twitter user posted a screenshot of a
very disgruntled black man's tweet claiming Darren Seals, the murder

A twitter post about a twitter post about a twitter post. Now that's
what I'd call serious evidence. http://i.imgur.com/LVY2jhM.gif

Any other criticisms? Anything USEFUL to offer, "Tom"? Besides trying to
dissuade people from reading it b/c of some non-factual nonsense on your
part.

I think people are able to decide themselfes and do not require me to
dissuade them from reading mails. I just want to see better evidence for
your claims.



best,
Tom

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.