On 9/3/16 5:46 PM, juan wrote:

On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:11:33 -0600
Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:

On 09/03/2016 01:17 PM, Xer0Dynamite wrote:

We are "anarchists" and we do what we want.

Anarchy doesn't scale.  What will you expect with billion+ people
without societal structure?  Watch World War Z and then Book of Eli
to find out.

Anarchy is a beautiful dream. But it's unworkable, except in small,
self-selected groups.



	I'm sure that retarded anti anarchy (and pro state)
	propaganda is 'on topic' in this list eh?

Some discussion of "* anarchy" isn't really anarchy, it is just maybe anarchy to someone fixated on a fixed definition of their favorite system. Or a signal by someone suggesting such a departure. Any real political anarchy has been a failure. If you have proof that isn't the case, then present it.


	
http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html

	"Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,  anonymous networks,
	digital pseudonyms, zero, knowledge, reputations, information
	markets,  black markets, collapse of governments."


	What are the last three words there?

What is the whole paragraph? Is it a checklist of goals? Is it a statement that everything is desired for any purpose? Or is it a definition of a term?

The whole "manifesto" is a statement of predictions and likely results. The only call to action is a non-specific 'arise'.



	So remind me who are in continual violation of list charter?

Juan more time: you philosophokiddies.

sdw