Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: Dan Kaminsky Dies from Vaccine
From: Karl <[email-masked]>
To: Greg Newby <[email-masked]>
Cc: cypherpunks <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:31:35 -0400

Greg, can you clarify whether or not the list is doing spam filtering?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 1:49 PM lolwut <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.pglaf.org",
> has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
> message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
> similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
> the administrator of that system for details.
>
> Content preview:
>
> Content analysis details:   (4.3 points, 4.0 required)
>
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
>                             [score: 0.0000]
> -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
>  1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
>                             bl.spamcop.net
>              [Blocked - see <
> https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?37.120.193.123>]
>  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
>                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
>                              for more information.
>                             [37.120.193.123 listed in list.dnswl.org]
> -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
>                             [37.120.193.123 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
>  1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL  RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
>                             https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
>                            [37.120.193.123 listed in
> bl.score.senderscore.com]
> -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
>  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
> necessarily
>                             valid
> -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
> signature
> -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
>                             author's domain
>  0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with
> no rDNS
>  2.8 DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX      Delivered direct to MX with Outlook headers
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: lolwut <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:48:29 -0400
> Subject: RE: Dan Kaminsky Dies from Vaccine
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cypherpunks [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
> Of
> Shawn K. Quinn
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 April, 2021 9:36 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: *SPAM* RE: DAN KAMINSKY DIES FROM VACCINE
>
> >On 4/28/21 16:50, lolwut wrote:
> >> Shawn, you should take a look at [link removed]
> >I looked at it, and it looks like the typical conspiracy theory horseshit.
>
> >COVID-19 is real, it can definitely kill you, and it is definitely "not
> just the flu". Thankfully, the pandemic (note, no "l") appears to be almost
> over.
>
> >--
> >Shawn K. Quinn <[email-masked]>
> >http://www.rantroulette.com
> >http://www.skqrecordquest.com
>
> It's fine that you disagree, and it's fine that you call it "conspiracy
> theory horseshit", but don't be a dick and deliberately tell everyone that
> you've removed (read: censored) the link with "[link removed]" when quoting
> my previous message. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html You
> can trim out quoted sections for purposes of brevity, of course, but it's
> clear in this instance that that wasn't your aim.
> https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html In prior messages with
> Punk, I recall, you also seemed quite keen in obsessively and condescending
> "correcting" his messages when quoting him (e.g., if he wrote "jew", you
> would replace it with "[Jew]") as a cheap and easy way to look like the
> smart one. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
>
> Even if you don't agree with the statement of the author of that page that
> the coronavirus isn't real, that isn't the entire content of the page.
> https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html I personally think that
> it
> is real, and that it can kill you, but not any more than the seasonal flu;
> and that, regardless of its actual danger, the lockdowns cannot be
> justified. https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/corona.html
>
>
>