"Came back" as in "ressurected". He likely experienced death on the cross but was able to "come back" at a later point in time (three days they say).

Anyway, I want to make a point here that is you can never prove anything about anything you haven't experienced in your lifetime and even your experiences are influenced by a lot of external factors you have no control over. Long story short, it doesn't matter whether Christ actually existed or not and taking one side or the other is a lost cause. The story of Christ, specifically, teaches a way of life that religion has masqueraded for its own profit. Think for yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kj4JgoJRQsM

Regards,
Michalis


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: USA: National Security Strategy, Juan's Wet Dream
Local Time: December 25, 2017 4:23 PM
UTC Time: December 25, 2017 3:23 PM
From: juan.g71@gmail.com
To: cp <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 07:28:53 -0500
Michalis Kargakis kargakis@protonmail.ch wrote:
 
Christ was crucified when he was 33 years old, ie. 33 CE. After they
thought he died, he actually came back
 
 
lawl - the fucking turd didn't exist - what do you mean, "came
back" ?
 
 
 
so I don't know what this
piece is trying to debunk.