- cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org

Dollar Value of a Datamined "Free" Service User?
by grarpamp 08 Apr '15

08 Apr '15

Many companies do not charge users of their services. They say things like "It's free and always will be." Pick any "free" service... Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Match, Reddit, the list goes on and on. Only the smallest of free services can be supported by someone's personal funds. So for larger services it's well understood that if their users aren't paying them, the money must come from somewhere. The old model answer of former years was advertising through page ads, clickstreams, referrals and those sorts of obvious and observable things. Combined with burning off stock market offerings. The new model answer includes all the former ways, plus much deeper profiling and analysis of users, their pictures, messages, interests, locations, etc... all done on the secret unobservable corporate backend, and selling off that metadata to the highest bidders. And perhaps more dollars from simply lying, violating their publicly posted hole ridden privacy policies, and selling directly identifiable user data as well. Or say taking immunity from prosecution from having given/sold it away to cozy governments. All of which have monetary values associated with them. Companies also hide their revenue, costs, and their "active in last three months" vs "dead user" numbers. Some usable public statements and government/market filings are available. And datacenter and employee costs can be approximated. There is current value analysis, such as in selling what's hot by this months clicks. And future/lifetime value analysis, such as Target datamining for pregnant women to own. There are also dataset specific values, such as names and addresses vs political alignments. The values could be represented in $dollars per month per user. Anyway, question... Anyone have links to studies made within the last five years that have attempted to calculate the dollar value of datamined users?

4 8

HavenCo - Rebirth?
by grarpamp 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

Highly doubt Ryan, Avi or any cpunks are involved, or that much of anything will actually be in SeaLand. Seems like a news driven oppurtunistic biz to cover tower operation and maintenance costs. Anyone have any facts? Such as who's behind it and why? http://www.sealandgov.org/sealand-news-1/HavenCo http://www.havenco.com/

2 1

The Government Can Perv My Junk... WTF!!!
by grarpamp 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M There are very few government checks on what America’s sweeping surveillance programs are capable of doing. John Oliver sits down with Edward Snowden to discuss the NSA, the balance between privacy and security, and dick-pics. http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/we-should-all-have-something-to-hide/

2 1

Nothing drives adoption of free software better than a good ole crackdown
by Seth 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

This is a case study of why I welcome crackdowns on online freedom and corporate silo censorship; it's highly effective in getting people off their ass and drives them into the warm and loving arms of free software and crypto. reposted from the Free Software Foundation newsletter ----------------------------------------------------- This guest post was submitted by Daniel Dianes, a Spanish free software activist. A Spanish language version of the post is coming soon. The cancellation or temporary suspension of various Spanish Twitter accounts has led to a huge migration of Spaniards to GNU social, a microblogging service designed to foster user freedom and control. This is an exciting win for federated online services. Unlike Twitter, which is controlled by a centralized authority, GNU social is a network of independent servers called nodes. Federation technology allows users to communicate between nodes, preserving the unified experience of traditional social media systems, and the free GNU social software allows anybody with an Internet connection to start their own public or private node and join the network. These administrators can even customize their nodes to suit the unique needs of their users. Since GNU social is decentralized, it's harder for a company or government to censor content or shut down the network when they feel threatened by it. This is more than a hypothetical threat—it has been attempted multiple times by oppressive governments. Spreading out user data also makes bulk surveillance considerably more difficult, as there is no single database to crack into and copy. Twitter user @Barbijaputa is popular in Spain, with more than 167,000 followers. She's known for criticizing the government or any other political parties or groups of power. On January 14th, Twitter suspended @Barbijaputa's account after she participated in a conversation about sexually transmitted diseases. The next day, she created a profile on GNU social node Quitter.se and started posting. Her Twitter followers proved willing to follow her all the way to GNU social, and began joining existing nodes en masse and starting their own. The growth was so explosive that the some of the existing GNU social nodes were unable to handle the traffic. On January 15th, a Quitter administrator posted this note: "Due to high traffic, I need to stop the registrations for some time to get back in control. Has been a crazy day (15.01.15) on quitter.no and .is - -regards @knuthollund" The node Quitter.es (Quitter Spain) was created to handle some of the extra people that overloaded existing GNU social instances like Quitter.no and Quitter.is. Quitter Spain now has 6,667 users and counting and Quitter.se reports 4,982 users, due in part to the incoming Spanish users. GNU social is not the only federated social network challenging the centralized status quo. GNU MediaGoblin lets users publish images, videos, 3D models, and other files, Diaspora* provides a Facebook-like experience and pump.io is another option for microblogging. The Free Software Foundation runs a GNU social node at https://status.fsf.org. Get started with GNU social today by picking from this list of nodes, and follow the Free Software Foundation at @fsf. Or try pump.io, and follow the FSF account @fsf there. Even if you don't have as many followers as @Barbijaputa, encourage them to follow you! Daniel Dianes, FSF member #9171 Read online: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/thousands-of-spaniards-leave-twitter-fo…

1 0

re: A crowdfunding campaign to build a free baseband
by wirelesswarrior＠Safe-mail.net 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

SF, Although creating an open GSM mobile modem is an interesting technical exercise it seems to make sense ONLY if there are secure mobile networks within which to operate. Although someday that might happen alas this not even close to being the case (there are several OS SDR projects for base station/network infrastructure creation). All standardized mobile networks were created with significant influence from intel agencies and even if OS SDR networks were deployed they could not be made secure if they integrated with the S7 backbone/interchange of the current networks. Even if your project manages to yield the result desired it will still be stuck in the "matrix". A much simpler, more secure and generally useful mobile system might result from mobile devices with hardended kernals/OS' using only WiFi in conjunction with good wireless hygine to prevent data leakage, a variety of available technologies to enable secure end-to-end voice and data communications. Secure paging, to alert users who's devices are not currently connected, should even be possible by adding a RTL receiver dongle and using appropriate tradecraft with existing pager networks (yes, they still exist and are used heavily by professionals (including sex workers), government and even devices calling for repair). WW PS: Suggest you enable lower contribution steps for crowd funding. They are too high for many who might like to help but cannot afford or justify the current steps.

1 0

Fwd: The West's Shame
by Александр 06 Apr '15

06 Apr '15

Brad Cabana The West's Shame There is something so bizarre, so inhumane about Western countries boycotting the parade for the 70th anniversary of the Soviet victory over Germany in World War II that I just had to write on it. Recently, the prime minister of the United Kingdom announced he will not be attending the parade. Previous to that, countries like Germany and the United States had announced the same. It's only a parade you say? No it's more than that. The Soviet Union sacrificed 25 million people to defeat Nazi Germany in World War II. A sacrifice beyond imagination, and far, far greater than all the countries fighting Nazi Germany combined. In comparison, the Holocaust, which is rightly remembered annually, claimed the lives of six million people of the Jewish faith. These are really the two true tragedy's of World War II unleashed on the world by Nazi Germany. The stories of Soviet soldiers advancing without weapons to pickup the rifle of the next dead soldier are well known. The bloodbath of Stalingrad, the siege of Leningrad, the millions of Soviet soldiers killed and captured (only to then die in POW camps) during the early days of the German invasion, and so on, all markers of the brutality of man against his own, stand large in the history of the world. In fact, the German invasion of the Soviet Union stands as the largest military battle in the history of man. Yet, western leaders have decided to not attend the parade that is meant to honour that sacrifice. When Britain announced it would not attend, well, that's the straw that broke the camel's back frankly. Of all the countries in the world, Britain was saved by the massive waves of young Soviet men and woman that bled the German army white. Hitler would have crushed Britain in short order if he had not diverted millions of German men to the invasion of the Soviet Union. Crucially, the diversion of aircraft, fighters and bombers, to the Soviet front saved Britain from the entire annihilation of a full blown, continuous air campaign, and the subsequent naval invasion that would certainly have occurred. In reality, the western allies left Stalin almost alone in Europe to battle the Nazi's, and take the majority of the casualties in doing so. By the time D-Day finally arrived, the German army and air force was only a shadow of it's former self as it existed in 1941. As bad and hard as it was for the allies to march east through Europe to Berlin, without the Soviet people's sacrifice, it would have never happened. It's a place of honour in human history. To quarrel with that is to go beyond ignorance. To quarrel with that is the hateful and arrogant bastion of the very seeds that caused World War II in the first place. And now, as if history is repeating itself, Western leaders have entered that bastion of ignorance and arrogance to punish Russia for the Ukrainian civil war. By contrast, Russian president Putin, despite the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, attended the 70th anniversary of the D-Day landings in France last year. He was given the proverbial cold shoulder by western leaders, yet he subjected himself to that, in honour of the sacrifice of the men of Canada, Britain and the United States. He did not ignore the history or the price in blood of that action. He honoured it. He put the sacrifice ahead of his political position, and it could even be said his personal shunning. Now that the time is here to do the same for the Soviet Union's dead, we cannot bring ourselves to do the same. What that says about us is really quite obvious. It means we haven't learned the lessons of history. That our political leadership has become so petty, so detached from historical reality, that it attempts to rewrite the history of 25 million souls. That is the danger of all of this. Russians don't really need the West to honour their sacrifice. They know it all too well. It's the West that needs to honour that sacrifice so it can clearly see the dangers of war on a scale far more destructive than anything it experienced on the western front, or anywhere else in history. Poland started this train rolling by refusing to invite the Russian president to the Holocaust remembrance at Auschwitz last year. This despite the fact that the Soviet army liberated all of Poland, and specifically Auschwitz from German armies. The actions of our western politicians say more about us than the Russians could ever say themselves. They have portrayed us as people who refuse to honour the dead, those that gave their lives in another time to defeat a tyrant bent on world domination, and in doing so dishonour those men and women. As the son of a young man, training in England, fighting in North Africa, Italy, Holland, and Germany through those tumultuous years of war and senseless slaughter, I recognize the Soviet sacrifice that probably saved my Dad's life. How could you not? Yet, that is exactly what our politicians are doing today. You don't have to be a lover of this country, or that country to recognize and honour grave human injustice committed on a massive scale. You just have to be humane, and subordinate your own bias in the remembrance of the fallen. Is that really so hard? Isn't that what is expected of us all? Wouldn't we expect that from our children? I've never been so ashamed of the actions of our governments than I am now with the boycott of that parade in Moscow. http://rocksolidpolitics.blogspot.ru/2015/03/the-wests-shame.html

4 3

Re: help UNSUBSCRIBE
by Shelley 06 Apr '15

06 Apr '15

Or DIY, go here --> https://cpunks.org/mailman/options/cypherpunks Enter your email address Get the password reminder sent to you (since you obviously didn't keep the original email or you would have RTFM) Enter your pwd Adios! ---------- On April 6, 2015 2:18:40 PM Razer <Rayzer(a)riseup.net> wrote: > Wrong address. > > This -> cypherpunks-request(a)cpunks.org > > JUST unsubscribe or JUST help in the subject > > > > On 04/06/2015 11:37 AM, thomas.fischermann(a)zeit.de wrote: > > > >> Am 06.04.2015 um 15:22 schrieb cypherpunks-request(a)cpunks.org: > >> > >> Send cypherpunks mailing list submissions to > >> cypherpunks(a)cpunks.org > >> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >> https://cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > >> cypherpunks-request(a)cpunks.org > >> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at > >> cypherpunks-owner(a)cpunks.org > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >> than "Re: Contents of cypherpunks digest..." > >> > >> > >> Today's Topics: > >> > >> 1. Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept (Cari Machet) > >> 2. Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept (c4p0) > >> 3. GPAs vs todays anonymous overlay networks (grarpamp) > >> 4. Re: Fwd: The West's Shame (jim bell) > >> 5. Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept (Bethany) > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Message: 1 > >> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:59:30 +0200 > >> From: Cari Machet <carimachet(a)gmail.com> > >> To: Alexis Wattel <alexiswattel(a)gmail.com> > >> Cc: cpunks <cypherpunks(a)cpunks.org> > >> Subject: Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept > >> Message-ID: > >> <CAGRDzQWhCiLWPJ7D=Mefskz8_CjkTTv2wHKOokdHX1FeH7phJQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> > >> its not a 'claim' watch his film that was up for an academy award > >> > >> there is a scene in mogadishu where he is in the morgue there is a dead > >> body and him in the scene he is standing right next to it - the > person was > >> hit by a drone strike > >> > >> no journalist gets filmed with dead bodies it is unethical it never > happens > >> > >> perhaps if you were a journalist in the field you would understand > >> > >> it isnt 'slander' if it is true so maybe you dont know anything about law > >> either > >> > >> just because you have not run across other people criticising the great > >> perfect white guy jeremy scahill doesnt mean it isnt happening - you seem > >> to assume a lot and not ask questions just flame out assuming you know > >> everything i think that is known as narcissism which people go to > >> psychiatrists to get help working out of as its such a lethal > condition but > >> it isnt easy because narcissists think they are right all the time > >> > >> besides even if i was the only one criticising jeremy that doesnt > prove me > >> wrong - prove me wrong > go ahead try... > >> > >> also i knew the 'report' was false that you assume i thought it was true > >> again proves my premise that you are narcissistic > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Alexis Wattel <alexiswattel(a)gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Speaking about facts checking: intrigued by these allegations I > looked up > >>> wiki on Omydiar, and his network association is said to have > partnered with > >>> the CIA, which is not generally all about "philanthropy", although this > >>> claim lack any reference. > >>> > >>> Would someone know why is the Agency mentioned there? > >>> > >>> Aside from that, financed projects include "mobile intelligence" for > >>> prospectors and deploying banks onto mobile phones to make sure everyone > >>> even in Africa pays his fees to the landlords. They even dare to say > it's > >>> cheaper than cash. I wonder how that is. > >>> > >>> > >>> Anyway... Wild allegations are very entertaining, but seriously > what's the > >>> real meaning of this about Tor? > >>> Because no technical evidence suggest it is "backdoored" (whatever that > >>> would mean, this is a trendy word, makes the one who says it sound > so l33t > >>> in journalism circles). > >>> > >>> On the other hand, Tor devs are more and more often prone on reminding > >>> that traffic analysis/correlation is not part of their threat model. The > >>> problem is that it is nowadays a definitely proven capability of > >>> adversaries. > >>> > >>> I really can't help thinking this is a deliberate desire of keeping > Tor at > >>> government's reach because the eternal argument they oppose do not > stand. > >>> They say that randomized wait times at each relay would make the traffic > >>> too slow. But I remember using Tor 8 years ago when it took forever > to load > >>> a Web page, and still did I use it in spite of this major extra effort, > >>> because anonymous surfing was such a blast. > >>> Today the network is fast enough to be able to swap 25% speed for a > >>> massive increase of anonymity. > >>> The other solution, randomized length of packets with dummy padding > >>> discarded at each relay would impact even less on responsiveness. > >>> > >>> I honestly can't see why they legitimately refuse to implement this. > >>> They seem to think that the need to observe both ends is too hard. Did > >>> they hear about the BGP routing attack that targeted Iceland? Funny > how the > >>> Silk Road server was found a month later in... Oh shit, Iceland. > >>> > >>> When you claim to protect activists with government money, you'd better > >>> not show dubious intentions if people trust are what you depend on. > Because > >>> that's why Tor was opened at first. The government officials needed > to hide > >>> among civilian traffic. They do need the people to run nodes. > >>> > >>> Le 6 avril 2015 15:04:21 CEST, xezha <xezha(a)riseup.net> a écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > > I think I may have to leave this list. > > > > Can you really not tell the difference between a real article and > > something made up/joke/propaganda? > > Please be a little more critical and back up for claims before slandering > > someones name. Even 5 minutes of research with google will demonstrate > > that > > you are the only source of ANY claims about Jeremy Scahills unethical > > journalism. You seem to have a screw loose. > > > > Xe > > > > > > On 06/04/15 02:35, Cari Machet wrote: > > >>>>> thank you!! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> i just want to say that @jeremyscahill took a selfie with a > > (murdered) > > dead body which no & i mean no journalist does - no one ... he is a very > > sick capitalist fascist > > >>>>> > > >>>>> he has done more than this but i wont go on & on > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Juan <juan.g71(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com> <juan.g71(a)gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:29:06 -0700 > > >>>>> Seth <list(a)sysfu.com <mailto:list@sysfu.com> <list(a)sysfu.com>> > > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > It's about damn time ;) > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > > http://chronicle.su/2015/03/07/greenwald-scahill-step-down-from-the-interce… > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> is this some kind of stupid 'joke' ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Cari Machet > > >>>>> NYC 646-436-7795 > > >>>>> carimachet(a)gmail.com <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com> > > <carimachet(a)gmail.com> > > >>>>> AIM carismachet > > >>>>> Syria +963-099 277 3243 > > >>>>> Amman +962 077 636 9407 > > >>>>> Berlin +49 152 11779219 > > >>>>> Reykjavik +354 894 8650 > > >>>>> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> > > <https://twitter.com/carimachet> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the > > >>>>> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you > > are not > > the > > >>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this > > >>>>> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email > > without > > >>>>> permission is strictly prohibited. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cari Machet > >> NYC 646-436-7795 > >> carimachet(a)gmail.com > >> AIM carismachet > >> Syria +963-099 277 3243 > >> Amman +962 077 636 9407 > >> Berlin +49 152 11779219 > >> Reykjavik +354 894 8650 > >> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> > >> > >> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 > >> > >> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the > >> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the > >> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this > >> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email > without > >> permission is strictly prohibited. > >>

1 0

help UNSUBSCRIBE
by thomas.fischermann＠zeit.de 06 Apr '15

06 Apr '15

> Am 06.04.2015 um 15:22 schrieb cypherpunks-request(a)cpunks.org: > > Send cypherpunks mailing list submissions to > cypherpunks(a)cpunks.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > cypherpunks-request(a)cpunks.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > cypherpunks-owner(a)cpunks.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of cypherpunks digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept (Cari Machet) > 2. Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept (c4p0) > 3. GPAs vs todays anonymous overlay networks (grarpamp) > 4. Re: Fwd: The West's Shame (jim bell) > 5. Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept (Bethany) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:59:30 +0200 > From: Cari Machet <carimachet(a)gmail.com> > To: Alexis Wattel <alexiswattel(a)gmail.com> > Cc: cpunks <cypherpunks(a)cpunks.org> > Subject: Re: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept > Message-ID: > <CAGRDzQWhCiLWPJ7D=Mefskz8_CjkTTv2wHKOokdHX1FeH7phJQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > its not a 'claim' watch his film that was up for an academy award > > there is a scene in mogadishu where he is in the morgue there is a dead > body and him in the scene he is standing right next to it - the person was > hit by a drone strike > > no journalist gets filmed with dead bodies it is unethical it never happens > > perhaps if you were a journalist in the field you would understand > > it isnt 'slander' if it is true so maybe you dont know anything about law > either > > just because you have not run across other people criticising the great > perfect white guy jeremy scahill doesnt mean it isnt happening - you seem > to assume a lot and not ask questions just flame out assuming you know > everything i think that is known as narcissism which people go to > psychiatrists to get help working out of as its such a lethal condition but > it isnt easy because narcissists think they are right all the time > > besides even if i was the only one criticising jeremy that doesnt prove me > wrong - prove me wrong > go ahead try... > > also i knew the 'report' was false that you assume i thought it was true > again proves my premise that you are narcissistic > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Alexis Wattel <alexiswattel(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Speaking about facts checking: intrigued by these allegations I looked up > > wiki on Omydiar, and his network association is said to have partnered with > > the CIA, which is not generally all about "philanthropy", although this > > claim lack any reference. > > > > Would someone know why is the Agency mentioned there? > > > > Aside from that, financed projects include "mobile intelligence" for > > prospectors and deploying banks onto mobile phones to make sure everyone > > even in Africa pays his fees to the landlords. They even dare to say it's > > cheaper than cash. I wonder how that is. > > > > > > Anyway... Wild allegations are very entertaining, but seriously what's the > > real meaning of this about Tor? > > Because no technical evidence suggest it is "backdoored" (whatever that > > would mean, this is a trendy word, makes the one who says it sound so l33t > > in journalism circles). > > > > On the other hand, Tor devs are more and more often prone on reminding > > that traffic analysis/correlation is not part of their threat model. The > > problem is that it is nowadays a definitely proven capability of > > adversaries. > > > > I really can't help thinking this is a deliberate desire of keeping Tor at > > government's reach because the eternal argument they oppose do not stand. > > They say that randomized wait times at each relay would make the traffic > > too slow. But I remember using Tor 8 years ago when it took forever to load > > a Web page, and still did I use it in spite of this major extra effort, > > because anonymous surfing was such a blast. > > Today the network is fast enough to be able to swap 25% speed for a > > massive increase of anonymity. > > The other solution, randomized length of packets with dummy padding > > discarded at each relay would impact even less on responsiveness. > > > > I honestly can't see why they legitimately refuse to implement this. > > They seem to think that the need to observe both ends is too hard. Did > > they hear about the BGP routing attack that targeted Iceland? Funny how the > > Silk Road server was found a month later in... Oh shit, Iceland. > > > > When you claim to protect activists with government money, you'd better > > not show dubious intentions if people trust are what you depend on. Because > > that's why Tor was opened at first. The government officials needed to hide > > among civilian traffic. They do need the people to run nodes. > > > > Le 6 avril 2015 15:04:21 CEST, xezha <xezha(a)riseup.net> a écrit : > >> > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> I think I may have to leave this list. > >> > >> Can you really not tell the difference between a real article and > >> something made up/joke/propaganda? > >> Please be a little more critical and back up for claims before slandering > >> someones name. Even 5 minutes of research with google will demonstrate that > >> you are the only source of ANY claims about Jeremy Scahills unethical > >> journalism. You seem to have a screw loose. > >> > >> Xe > >> > >> > >> On 06/04/15 02:35, Cari Machet wrote: > >> > thank you!! > >> > > >> > i just want to say that @jeremyscahill took a selfie with a (murdered) > >> dead body which no & i mean no journalist does - no one ... he is a very > >> sick capitalist fascist > >> > > >> > he has done more than this but i wont go on & on > >> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Juan <juan.g71(a)gmail.com > >> <mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com> <juan.g71(a)gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:29:06 -0700 > >> > Seth <list(a)sysfu.com <mailto:list@sysfu.com> <list(a)sysfu.com>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > It's about damn time ;) > >> > > > >> > > > >> http://chronicle.su/2015/03/07/greenwald-scahill-step-down-from-the-interce… > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > is this some kind of stupid 'joke' ? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cari Machet > >> > NYC 646-436-7795 > >> > carimachet(a)gmail.com <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com> > >> <carimachet(a)gmail.com> > >> > AIM carismachet > >> > Syria +963-099 277 3243 > >> > Amman +962 077 636 9407 > >> > Berlin +49 152 11779219 > >> > Reykjavik +354 894 8650 > >> > Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> > >> <https://twitter.com/carimachet> > >> > > >> > 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 > >> > > >> > Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the > >> > addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not > >> the > >> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this > >> > information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email > >> without > >> > permission is strictly prohibited. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > >> > >> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVIoRQAAoJEBxZWCa0ilYttJAP/2XY5i+2lpUYspwBR/Rw/2et > >> cQkzvtScdeyfjBXubS9LZAuKol9OcKaFj4vww1E2unnoImuHrLfAKsZZs/Ty3yib > >> 2YC1XWgsFtUAEOg7pHFLxxY+N/8XQplAB8vvm1V8+GMllwESmGspPPZxXc7yL4Vw > >> Ks4VIaF+gZlgFAr4jqjN2W8/67PVYYjVWLxibxmPIyl1SfMjnUh2v7qL779dpyC/ > >> c3eEb8oT2pGuK8rJzyVLUCtnghSeRHsSR08EFhaCLJGSuUmir6hEXhWBV4VOKudH > >> 1tMy/RR7ldOBv5ICMdpZ5wNItSzLjg5+Iib2jODdwirvSfI/8Mo6LGFPsufZn0Nr > >> Oq7Nwjafb4w87OqW4R4vFepOqlQA1/G6XNxKVCSoU/cP10A8YHf2KQ5IEvkYa7UC > >> wyKTmFWFaSa6vdqtv9XDJfXVozOjg/JVOI62mrVphXyBKWa9UEvobTSvyZ/EfcFk > >> /QGoOE3knIFQaYyRhtbXIeHw+BGp2+fGxKUW0nIgmPsJvJw3Zt9/WI5iXCYoD5M4 > >> Ivo5nNcYPchSL9gI6Rv0TIcNxPhahjnklav19enEYI2zZfqmwxHlYUiJjsoZU0J/ > >> XseAUt/Z6cVzksWi5/9RLTBLx7pNeDX4TJOeq0JwB6sGL99EH7p1/812ksr3fAF2 > >> 2Xd2B4E6TkgyoDHlZ2cW > >> =Gsmo > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> > >> > > > -- > Cari Machet > NYC 646-436-7795 > carimachet(a)gmail.com > AIM carismachet > Syria +963-099 277 3243 > Amman +962 077 636 9407 > Berlin +49 152 11779219 > Reykjavik +354 894 8650 > Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> > > 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 > > Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the > addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this > information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without > permission is strictly prohibited. >

2 1

Re: [tor-talk] rant - just want a bit of music
by grarpamp 06 Apr '15

06 Apr '15

> Surely solving the ready-access to censored > content problem would be a good start for our freedom lovin' > community? We have at least 2 (maybe even 3-5) anonymous overlay networks that could be utilized to transport the final solution to this problem (absent copyright regime change). Even plain old BT. Yet curiously, no one seems to be building any solution at scale within them. > rant - just want a bit of music See above. Or keep on ranting. At least until you convince certain communities to evolve beyond their simpleminded value/ideal of leech and run, speed first (which can actually be quite acceptable). > We need some sort of bit-torrent for censored youtubes, where those > who've already downloaded a youtube file, can automatically make it > available to others This is no different than BT with search. An engine to map YT-ID to BT-info hashes is largely moot given you'd know the title to search anyway.

1 0

Fwd: A crowdfunding campaign to build a free baseband
by Blibbet 06 Apr '15

06 Apr '15

FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: A crowdfunding campaign to build a free baseband Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:41:54 GMT From: Spacefalcon the Outlaw <falcon(a)ivan.Harhan.ORG> To: replicant(a)lists.osuosl.org Hello free phone lovers, As we all know, the baseband/modem/radio processor is the big bone in our collective throat: it is the most closed and proprietary part of every currently available phone, no matter how free the rest of the phone might be. Well, without beating further around the bush, I just started a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo seeking to change this bleak baseband situation: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/free-software-cellular-baseband My project seeks to solve the problem of the closed and proprietary baseband by producing a GSM modem module that will run 100% free firmware. And furthermore, I seek to produce such a free baseband not by creating it from scratch, but by re-creating one that was already made by someone else some years ago and later discontinued. Please read the campaign page for the full details. Thanks for reading, SF _______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list Replicant(a)lists.osuosl.org http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant

1 0