- cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org

Fwd: [tor-talk] victory at kilton library
by grarpamp 16 Sep '15

16 Sep '15

https://twitter.com/flexlibris https://twitter.com/libraryfreedom https://twitter.com/nhleblibraries https://twitter.com/LebLibraries ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tempest <tempest(a)bitmessage.ch> Date: Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:30 PM Subject: [tor-talk] victory at kilton library To: tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org i just want to share the news that all of the hard work that has gone into the library freedom project paid off today at kilton library. despite pressure from the us federal government, which pulled out every card to sell fear that they had in their hat, the local community refused to accept it and thought on a global level to support the library's choice to offer a tor relay to the public. this is truly a monumental moment. libraries in the usa have often been the target of hostile actions that threaten the first amendment of the us constitution and the privacy rights of people. through a long string of legal battles, libraries have earned an extraordinary position that provides them with the ability to offer services that could land other people in significant legal battles which become both legally and politically difficult to close down. i'd just like to say thank you to everyone involved in the library freedom project who came up with the idea and didn't run away from the fight. this is an excellent beginning. if you can, please send your support to the library freedom project. https://libraryfreedomproject.org/donate this is a great victory for today. -- gpg key - 0x2A49578A7291BB34 fingerprint - 63C4 E106 AC6A 5F2F DDB2 3840 2A49 578A 7291 BB34 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

2 1

Re: [Cryptography] [cryptography] JYA and Cryptome Keys Compromised
by John Young 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

Correct analysis. First was get out a prompt notice to wave off users, then proceed with other authentications. Toughest problem is how to avoid another compromise of new keys since so many ways to do that have arisen and/or suspected over the life of PGP and other systems. WoT is problematic too, as are key signing parties, and so on. Other systems claim to be better, and we are using some of them, waiting and watching and suspecting are the lessons learned from stalwart testbed PGP in all its guises and disguises. We likely would not have discovered the compromises if not for those lessons. Nor do we mind starting from scratch, perhaps a bit more often than 11 years. Tornados do happen out side alleys of easy prediction (this is not a cyphersec sales motto). At 04:22 PM 9/15/2015, Paul Wouters wrote: >On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, John Young wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED >MESSAGE----- by unknown key. > I have learned today that all PGP >public keys of John Young > <jya(a)pipeline.com> and Cryptome ><cryptome(a)earthlink.net> have been > compromised. > The keys have >been revoked today. Revocation could have been done by the person >who stole the keys too. That in itself is not good enough. > Two new >keys have been generated today: > > John Young 15-0915 ><jya(a)pipeline.com> 0xD87D436C > Cryptome 15-0915 ><cryptome(a)earthlink.net> 0x8CD47BD5 Which I cannot find on either >pgp.mit.edu or pgp.surfnet.nl. I did find them on keyserver.pgp.com, >but I don't know who runs it and with the additional captcha >software, no idea if that is compromised :P It is announced using >short keyids, not to be trusted, and no finger prints although we >can get those from the key used to sign this message I guess. $ gpg >--list-sigs D87D436C pub 4096R/D87D436C 2015-09-15 >uid John Young 15-0915 <jya(a)pipeline.com> >sig N D87D436C 2015-09-15 John Young 15-0915 ><jya(a)pipeline.com> sig CA57AD7C 2015-09-15 [User ID not >found] sub 4096R/79F82F3B 2015-09-15 sig D87D436C >2015-09-15 John Young 15-0915 <jya(a)pipeline.com> $ gpg --list-sigs >8CD47BD5 pub 4096R/8CD47BD5 2015-09-15 >uid Cryptome 15-0915 <cryptome(a)earthlink.net> >sig N 8CD47BD5 2015-09-15 Cryptome 15-0915 ><cryptome(a)earthlink.net> sig CA57AD7C 2015-09-15 [User ID >not found] sub 4096R/27BCF5FB 2015-09-15 sig 8CD47BD5 >2015-09-15 Cryptome 15-0915 <cryptome(a)earthlink.net> The keys are >both announced but not signed by each other? I fetched CA57AD7C >which has 6863 signatures on it. It seems to be some PGP global >directory key, signed by a few people I know, but still seems to be >only proof that it came from the keyserver, not that the key >actually belongs to you. > This message is signed by the first. But >is that first key signed by the old keys? (which of course could >also have been done by the attacker, so you need to re-start a web >of trust with some of your personal confidants. > -----BEGIN PGP >SIGNATURE----- from an unknown key - with no direct signatures of >any known trustable key run by a human. Paul >_______________________________________________ The cryptography >mailing list cryptography(a)metzdowd.com >http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

2 1

JYA and Cryptome Keys Compromised
by John Young 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 15 September 2015 I have learned today that all PGP public keys of John Young <jya(a)pipeline.com> and Cryptome <cryptome(a)earthlink.net> have been compromised. The keys have been revoked today. Two new keys have been generated today: John Young 15-0915 <jya(a)pipeline.com> 0xD87D436C Cryptome 15-0915 <cryptome(a)earthlink.net> 0x8CD47BD5 This message is signed by the first. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wsFVAwUBVfhrXUkY+k7YfUNsAQgyeQ/+PA604lj8ZrZq9qnRMsbA86DdGPUyrdub IWlQSpp5wyMMQG4VegjG7iwXBt6GftKQFLKuW527wGxaxIBJj1n2GhCMkn7mko1s u107yQ5WVfJUTOHgazi2viuw8v3ixmJ/GcdvEeGCL23ErgGwvI6+JilmkP7vonmu 73ckavqrs6VvUJjjwzoIbgvXxsp+oqKT5EgZqfroQOaaz3e4AjipxwMav2VMqVTl xZdHlp/QGab8Cet17NnDsNmN38YWT5t4pU1tL+0aN9jf7Vy+Jzx5g8nMk0e7ogzz vg8ioWs3EkxJbjQaWK5/COjoYLjIZn6H5zUJgIBRtqsnbfNUcQisCNbwx1fNRGwq DItG/jeHp65q6eDxFVWGkptDuZKUH4fGuiiRMxIySrj1CA1+9M5Q+m2TxnL/SFNU AIfupcGWhtXXa1ZN70LT3fnIu9y9B5mQLSshn14eekD3t0nb+OkL+XEC0nJqnfVD xOOqAjHQj1ytEfHSKb+i+/tHTCCTOKeaHM3JGE6qIawrn+aRfKsnGK9t+JiVEtyx 1d+L0gHwtcUd5MWQJdCMHoM10ri5cgx0A6su+lYnLgOcXYD3uHSVIdp1cSf3Wzwb 3MrO2BqqhL5y1Ip3Cfv+h+eXaZWWMr5w97kjSOYD/lwb61iA1tpWLkgiuUGBGrFb 32VkU7sMt4E= =Q9BO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

John McAfee Runs For US President In 2016 Under Cyber Party
by grarpamp 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

https://mcafee16.com/ http://cyberparty.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McAfee http://www.whoismcafee.com/ http://www.futuretensecentral.com/ https://twitter.com/officialmcafee https://twitter.com/JohnMcAfeeStory http://johnmcafeestory.com/

8 23

More neighbours make more fences [Economist]
by Ben Mezger 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

Oh the irony ;-) http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/09/daily-chart-10? Hey cpunks, what year are we? - 1940 for sure. -- Sent with my mu4e

1 0

Has someone examined the leaked Hacking Team stuff for linux/bsd 0days?
by Georgi Guninski 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

Has someone examined the leaked Hacking Team stuff for linux/bsd 0days? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/10/redmond_yells_cut_on_hacking_team_h… Another of exploits against Microsoft Windows that hit as a zero day after Hacking Team was hacked has been fixed.

2 3

Cryptography beyond the 5 senses
by Muntu Debugger 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Take on the challenge! can society be influenced with out the 5 senses? dilligently study this; http://j.mp/Diplomat101 and give your take. cheers Muntu

1 0

Anyone familiar with SEO (Search Engine Optimization) techniques? I have a mystery.
by jim bell 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

For those who can help, please do a Google search for 'Bell further alleged in his 2003'You will notice that there are MANY results that contain that phrase, but have something close to gibberish, before and after it. Some results are genuine, but most are apparently not. I suspect that I am the victim of some sort of SEO-techniques, attempting to cover up the fact of the fake, forged appeal case 99-30210. I suspect that the following company had something to do with it: http://www.icmconsulting.com/seo.html See, for instance, http://www.simcoehall.com/service/background-check-expunged.html Jim Bell

8 13

I've never been into Astrology, but...
by jim bell 13 Sep '15

13 Sep '15

http://hexagoninfulleffect.com/2013/02/07/sun-in-aries-moon-in-scorpio-nigh… One of the more curious web pages I've seen recently. Jim Bell

2 1

Re: [tor-talk] Library installs Tor exit node; pulls plug after pressure from DHS
by Cari Machet 13 Sep '15

13 Sep '15

as i have stated i dont trust tor because monolithic and we need more solutions than shit developed by the state but it could be a beautiful lawsuit against the federal gov - those are needed for sure everywhere anywhere - state sovereignty needs more legal enactment On Sep 12, 2015 3:31 AM, "Chris" <tmail299(a)errtech.com> wrote: > On 2015-09-11 07:19 PM, grarpamp wrote: > >> A lot of support should be lent right now to the city managers, library >>> board, >>> and the community. You don't want the first one to be publicly quashed by >>> a bunch of shameful LEA fearmongering. >>> Show up the board meeting, you can bet they will. >>> >> >> Someone should also see about notifying these folks, >> you might end up with an entire state full of relays... >> > > - Free State Participant Here (not in NH yet though) - > > I actually was wondering if it wasn't FSP participants who were working on > the relays in the first place... though that said on a prior brief attempt > to identify the main participants in the library project I could find no > obvious connections. However that doesn't surprise me. I've also not > identified any participation by other individuals in the FSP despite > seeming like highly likely participants (for instance Ross Ulbricht of Silk > Road fame holds many views held by said participants and his mother has > even talked at multiple FSP events post arrest). > > Unfortunately I haven't gotten very far with another campaign regarding > the FCC's efforts to force manufacturers to lock down devices on Free Talk > Live (which does promote the Free State Project and is run out of Keene, > NH). I called in briefly as the show generally doesn't do interviews / > talks and like many other shows. Rather they let anybody call in about > anything (ie the name Free Talk Live). That said I'd still encourage people > to call into Free Talk Live. Multiple people coordinating it would be a > smart move and I'd be happy to participate in such a campaign to 'target > FTL' (they wouldn't object). > > The site and call in # can be found at https://www.freetalklive.com/ and > the show airs daily on the east coast from 7PM-10PM 7 days a week. > > There are other FSP media outlets (ie libtery-minded outlets heavily > involved in the FSP). The Free Talk Live show seems to be the most > outstanding from FSP events I've attended (ie they show up to Porcfest in > the summer, which is an FSP summer camping event, and Liberty Forum, > another winter event, traditional conference style). > > https://www.freetalklive.com/ > > * Also just noticed in on the site that there is a link to an article on > the issue already. > > Another show is Freedom Phoenix. I've had a lot of luck here, but I > believe it is out in Arizona (ie phoenix). Not sure who in the NH region if > anybody listens to it, but I know they've covered Porcfest before. I've > been on the show twice and will be on for a third time this coming week > (Tuesday September 15th) to talk about the FCC's efforts to ban free > software (practical result/outcome of rule changes, not specific objective > necessarily). > > https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/ > > You might also try: > > http://freekeene.com/ > > http://lrn.fm > > http://copyblock.org > > http://libertyconspiracy.com/ > > http://www.katherinealbrecht.com/ > > http://schoolsucksproject.com/ > > http://www.shirelibertynews.com/ > > http://www.youtube.com/user/RidleyReport > > You might check out 411 Activist TXT Msg Distribution Service which sends > out a message to all activists cell phones in the area: > > > http://forum.shiresociety.com/discussion/5744/keene-411-v-2-0-activist-txt-… > > Keene is about an hour away... > > There is also Free Grafton 40 minutes away ( > http://www.freetownproject.com/new_hampshire_town.html) > > There is also Free Concord an hour 20 minutes away ( > http://freeconcord.org/) > > > >> https://freestateproject.org/ >> http://forum.freestateproject.org/ >> > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk >

1 0