What a woman, hey?
For that "wholesome" image I guess .. or something.
** “The butcher of Libya” is now part of the resistance (Video)
http://theduran.com/the-butcher-of-libya-is-now-part-of-the-resistance-vide…
------------------------------------------------------------
Hillary Clinton ridiculously claims she is an activist citizen.
>
> The Constitutional Rubicon of an Assange Prosecution
>
> By Elizabeth Goitein
> Tuesday, May 9, 2017
>
> "If you were tuning in and out of FBI Director James Comey’s hearing
> before the House Intelligence Committee last Wednesday, you probably
> got an earful about Comey’s public statements on Clinton’s use of a
> private e-mail server, and you may have heard his staunch defense of
> Section 702 of FISA. But you might have missed the moment in which
> Comey and Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) threatened to topple one of the
> longstanding pillars of journalistic freedom.
>
> That moment came when Sasse asked Comey why Julian Assange has not
> been charged with a crime in connection with WikiLeaks’ publication of
> classified information. (Sasse was at it again during yesterday’s
> hearing on the Russia investigation, quizzing former DNI Clapper about
> Assange’s actions.) After refusing to answer whether charges were
> pending, Comey effectively confirmed that they were: “He hasn’t been
> apprehended because he’s inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London.” He
> also said that “WikiLeaks is an important focus of our attention.”
>
> No one has ever been prosecuted for publishing classified information
> obtained through a leak. Although some parts of the Espionage Act
> would appear, on their face, to allow prosecution in such cases, Comey
> acknowledged that “the Department of Justice’s view has been [that]
> newsgathering and legitimate news reporting is not covered, is not
> going to be investigated or prosecuted as a criminal act.” The
> Department to date has drawn a clear line between government officials
> who leak classified information, and media outlets that publish it.
> “Our focus is and should be on the leakers, not those [who] are
> obtaining it as part of legitimate newsgathering.”
>
> One might posit a distinction between those who passively receive
> classified information and those who actively solicit leaks, as
> WikiLeaks is reported to do. (Obama’s Department of Justice flirted
> with that approach: in an affidavit seeking to obtain e-mails between
> Fox reporter James Rosen and a State Department source who was under
> investigation for leaking classified information, the Department
> accused Rosen of conspiring to violate the Espionage Act.) But Comey
> was not making that distinction. Senator Sasse asked him whether
> “American journalists [who] court and solicit [classified]
> information” have violated the law, and Comey responded that the
> Department of Justice would not prosecute such activity.
>
> So why, in Comey’s mind, is it permissible to bring charges against
> Assange? He explained his reasoning as follows..."
>
With links:
https://www.justsecurity.org/40672/constitutional-rubicon-assange-prosecuti…
>
> Elizabeth Goitein co-directs the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty
> and National Security Program. Before joining the Brennan Center, Ms.
> Goitein served as counsel to Sen. Russ Feingold and as a trial
> attorney in the Federal Programs Branch of the Civil Division of the
> Department of Justice.
...looks as if the whole 'internet' is already owned by
cloudflare? It's mildly interesting because it shows that it's
rather easy to route most of the world's traffic through a
single system - contrary to all the bullshit about
'decentralization' 'complexity' and whatnot.
https://www.apnews.com/d69a8e6db867477795f4152d0511bbf9
Filmmaker learns why she endured airport stops for years
WASHINGTON (AP) — Laura Poitras’ travel nightmare began more than a
decade ago when the award-winning filmmaker started getting detained
at airports every time she tried to set foot back in the United
States.
Poitras, 53, knows U.S. government officials are not exactly fans of
her politically sensitive work.
She was stopped without explanation more than 50 times on foreign
travel, and dozens more times on domestic trips, before the extra
searches suddenly stopped in 2012. Only now is Poitras beginning to
unravel the mystery, which goes back to a bloody day in Baghdad in
2004.
Members of a U.S. Army National Guard unit from Oregon reported seeing
a “white female” holding a camera on a rooftop just before they were
attacked. David Roustum, 22, an Army National Guardsman from West
Seneca, New York, was killed. Several troops were wounded. Some
guardsmen who saw Poitras suspected she had a heads-up about the
attack and didn’t share that information with American forces because
she wanted to film it. If true, Poitras would have broken U.S.
criminal law.
Poitras called the allegation false and said she didn’t film the attack.
“There is no ambush footage,” Poitras told the AP. “That’s the
narrative that they created, but it doesn’t correspond with any
facts.”
After the attack, a lieutenant colonel, whose name was redacted from
documents, reported the woman with a camera to his superiors. No
action was taken.
But after returning home, the lieutenant colonel was contacted by
author John Bruning of Dallas, Oregon, who was interviewing guardsmen
for a book about their experiences in Iraq. According to the
government’s documents, the author learned about the woman filming on
the rooftop before the ambush.
In an email exchange on Jan. 15, 2006, Poitras confirmed to Bruning
that she was filming in the area the day of the attack, but didn’t
think she could help the author with his research.
Bruning declined to speak to the AP about Poitras.
But in his sworn statement to military investigators, he said he
believed Poitras had prior knowledge of the attack.
Poitras worries her ordeal will resume.
She is seeking more information from the government. A federal judge
in Washington ruled late last month the FBI hadn’t provided adequate
justification for withholding some information.
“I don’t know if the investigation is ongoing,” she said. “I don’t
know if it was ended or why it was ended.”
Ulterior States [IamSatoshi Documentary]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQGQXy0RIIohttp://www.iamsatoshi.com/ulterior-states-documentaryhttps://twitter.com/Iam_Satoshi
proofofwork.media/iamsatoshi/
https://www.facebook.com/I.am.Satoshi.Nakamoto
Published on Jun 27, 2015
A Film By Tomer Kantor - An IamSatoshi Production
Ulterior States, an IamSatoshi production, is an argumentative
documentary project. The participatory development, production and
post ‘guerilla-film-making-methods’, bounced between (non-academic)
literature research, video interviews and studio sessions. This
investigative process allowed having real-life conversations with some
thought leaders within the Bitcoin ecosystem. In an attempt to portray
the community behind the message to adopt a network, being a one-man
team allowed for easier access to the subjects. The enthusiasm and
commitment that saturate through the lens in many parts of the film,
expose how the adopters of Bitcoin want to explore, to probe and, to
show the world, something important, otherwise overlooked.
The film took three years and 125 videos to complete. Through this
journey, I got immersed in the decentralised crypto-currency culture
and met a bunch of wonderful futuristic-pirates, I would have never
met otherwise. It is becoming easier to admit that Ulterior States is
an expression of my perceptions, an extract of the years 2012-2015.
The collaged story explores code as activism and discovers a melting
pot through the neutrality of a decentralised consensus. It looks to
the future from different humanist perspectives and argues that
crypto-currencies could lead towards; community governed micro-state
applications.
Ulterior States was completely self-funded and produced as a final
project for London South Bank University [MA - Arts & Humanity -
Digital Film].
Hi all,
FTP, LTL, PBG!
I have had enough of the state of the United Kingdom - not to mention the
many other states across, around, and inside the globe some call Earth.
Those yet to be formed, and those beginning to form, in the near Earth
environment must not be excluded from our development as a collective.
I would like to be advised of my chances of establishing a United Kingdoms
organisation, tasked with maintaining human endeavours appropriately,
distinctly and in conjunction, with only a 100% agreement allowing the
exclusion of an artifact or ideal from the knowledge-base we share.
I'm really eager to outpace the UK general elections, any ideas around what
can be done to inch towards the above much appreciated!
Sincerely,
and some love,
Gaz/schmooster/Gareth
On 3 May 2017 20:00, <cypherpunks-request(a)lists.cpunks.org> wrote:
Send cypherpunks mailing list submissions to
cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cypherpunks-request(a)lists.cpunks.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cypherpunks digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: What is the value of the State? (Zenaan Harkness)
2. Re: What is the value of the State? (Zenaan Harkness)
3. Re: What is the value of the State? (Steve Kinney)
4. My piece on Barrett Brown's release yesterday (Douglas Lucas)
5. [MONEY] [WAR] [BOLIVIA] - Evo Morales "Banks control the
world" (Zenaan Harkness)
6. Re: What is the value of the State? (\0xDynamite)
7. Re: What is the value of the State? (\0xDynamite)
8. Re: What is the value of the State? (\0xDynamite)
9. [CypherPunks] Event Invitation (May 23, 2017 - New York, New
York) (Joshua)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 10:46:48 +1000
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net>
To: cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
Subject: Re: What is the value of the State?
Message-ID: <20170503004648.GB30251@x220-a02>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:50:51PM -0500, \0xDynamite wrote:
> That's some good bit o' history. I was really referring to the level
> of existing order needed to create *more* levels of order.
E.g "create tech to fly to Mars" and stuff?
> I don't
> think it's possible to argue with that.
Humans have no problems organising themselves to create technology.
Never have.
But can humans organise themselves to stop collectively dominating
the individual when the individuals harms no one else and damages no
property?
History tells us the answer to this question is generally "no, humans
will almost always collectively blame externals for any and every
perceived problem".
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 10:40:49 +1000
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net>
To: "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward(a)gmail.com>
Cc: cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
Subject: Re: What is the value of the State?
Message-ID: <20170503004049.GA30251@x220-a02>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:41:16PM +0000, \0xDynamite wrote:
> >> How does anarchy provide the high-level of organization needed to
> >> produce a car?
> >
> > Humans have this funny habit of organising themselves, through
> > conversation into action, to meet actual needs or desires. "Social
> > animals" and all..
> >
> > Seriously, the problem is not, has never been and never will be, lack
> > of self-interest motivation to create trinkets and "wealth", sadly.
>
> Yet, they haven't "self-organized" to come together and FIX the
> problem in their own self-interest, have they? So there either is an
> error in the analysis or there is some EXISTENTIALLY OTHER force that
> prevents it that is not of this world --otherwise they would come
> together and knock it down. But because of it's other-dimensional
> nature, it is completley "invisibile" to them or unfamiliar, and don't
> know how to approach the problem.
Yes - notwithstanding ones preferred conception of the problem, or
the source of the problem, what's an approach to tackling that which
we struggle to put into words and apparently affects "most people"?
For starters, can we identify attributes/experiences on a personal
level which verify or point to, this problem? I'm thinking confront -
when one is intercepted by police for something trivial like driving
9km/hr over "the speed limit", and one decides to boldly speak to
said police and firmly put them in their immoral place (in the
conversation that is) - one can tend to experience certain
physiological twitches, gut-based electricity flows, and or a mild
heat rising through the spine.
This, and an endless litany of examples I'm sure you could come up
with, is adequately described by the term "confront".
So when the individual is confronted, something is "going down" to
use a colloquialism.
Confront is therefore an actual identifier for "many things that
could take books to describe".
But, rather than spend books so describing and dissecting, can we
take this confront, and do something useful with it?
The journey of life, one's 'choices' and pathway through life are a
very personal thing of course, but we have a fundamental collective
problem:
Most people want to not confront the bully, and are not aware
that a little bit of individual action, done by many at a
collective level, can shift "the problems instituted by our system/
The State etc" in very good ways.
And as a side benefit, walking head first (but calmly) into those
little confronts where really, truth ought be spoken to power,
often leads to really enjoyable electrical flows and sensations in
the body which may commonly be associated with the words happiness,
joy, satisfaction and a deep and abiding peace and comfort.
In this time of the bully running rampant (police, taxation, forced
medical procedures, courts/legal bullying, etc) the opportunities for
personal growth and personal discovery are truly abundant.
:)
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 21:32:56 -0400
From: Steve Kinney <admin(a)pilobilus.net>
To: cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
Subject: Re: What is the value of the State?
Message-ID: <a3747f71-a757-1eee-d0d2-31eb3e9b121e(a)pilobilus.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2017 05:39 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>>> But I like the sentiment. I think the problem is more than
>>> the State. It's the pathetic infrastructure that would be an
>>> eyesore for centuries.
>>
>> Bear in mind that the "State" is a model of governance, not a
>> synonym for governance. It is a failed model, as witness the
>> Anthropocene Era's mass extinction even in progress and the
>> pending human population crash.
[ ... ]
> The solution, then, is a META-state. A system of order bigger
> and better than the State.
Given that hierarchal power structures enabled and enforced by the
State are the major cause of the greatest collective problems faced by
the human race, the solution to the greatest collective problems faced
by the human race is a bigger more powerful State!
The logic behind this is self evident and inescapable.
:o)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZCTNIAAoJEECU6c5Xzmuq8X8IAIt8Kp+Zja/VWcw7Y79H+kOW
1cGoXvlJZYGRITxWifeHjwD/sw41KGdveVHdymk9JXXTvoiIzQhOx7L31FOBczat
adJhjiI9fvOOD0iYocgKspmAvSKJWUSH1GA9Gl4pmm4aQYpmkqVP27K/O6PJq3CL
AnBKKuEY5w4+lovgiuHtGaEby/KJHUUBy3XJQfCsdiqTAr+5jzsqyLcOuNcVW+Ic
BFie4bVxNGnjUdrcc2wz8QLfGNypjZxRU83+LJ3yuBjcHP0LM8+ROV8PQkD1sVQR
c/jEZnRK5LmeBj2NMVrB8xkRF16VxMRgy3i9x2a9waeftnUpuzXhWBqc8KkCezU=
=b744
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 19:15:53 -0700
From: Douglas Lucas <dal(a)riseup.net>
To: cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
Subject: My piece on Barrett Brown's release yesterday
Message-ID: <cd0e717a-8379-5805-1f76-2e821a199bf5(a)riseup.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
https://thecryptosphere.com/2017/05/01/barrett-brown-released-from-prison/
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:11:50 +1000
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net>
To: CypherPunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Subject: [MONEY] [WAR] [BOLIVIA] - Evo Morales "Banks control the
world"
Message-ID: <20170503031150.GC30251@x220-a02>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
More and more, a few public figures are speaking out. Some spoke
too soon and tried to shift their country "unilaterally against USA/
banks' interests" like Gadhafi/Qaddafi of Lybia and without a proper
unity with other nations/ other peoples.
The forces/ intentions/ powers involved, are too great and too
ruthless for a nation such as Lybia or Syria without support of
another that would support for a "multi polar" "many powers" world,
against the one world order of the Rothschild's one world banking
order.
Evo Morales: take note of the Saddams and the Qaddafis now gone -
your "independence" must be in action with others also obtaining/
retaining their independence, and not alone. This might be stating
the obvious, but the obvious weren't so obvious to Qaddafi, to Saddam
and to many before them.
China has rolled over to the comfort of the IMF and World Bank,
although keeping a toe in with Russia and the BRICS NDB, as well as
hedging with their own AIIB/Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank -
but how independent they are, and how intertwined with the IMF, I
don't know.
Ultimately the current money interests wish to retain their power and
authority, and what we witness appears to be possibly just factional
fighting between the existing "moneyed powers" or authorities, what
some call the "banking families". They fight ruthlessly, and
completely unfairly, at every turn.
So, what are the binds/ intertwining of the NDB and the AIIB?
Are these entities beneficial in the long term, or are we witnessing
mere factional fights and nothing more than the long term persistence
of the enslavement of humanity?
Can digital currencies generate "faith" in their "reality" enough to
shift the enslavement (debt based) regime on this planet for any
significant number of humans?
Are there enough humans even considering such long term questions and
considerations to be able to effect any significant shift?
** Bolivia Drops Truth Bomb: Independent Monetary Policy Is Key to
National Sovereignty
http://russia-insider.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=
fa2faf7034c3c3c413cb3652f&id=34a35f6f6d&e=5110f4b440
------------------------------------------------------------
by RI Staff on Tue, May 2, 2017
Bolivia is one of the few countries left on Earth that has the
cojones to tell it like it is. We witnessed some much needed
truth-telling last month when Bolivia's ambassador to the UN
deconstructed Nikki Haley's word goo at the Security Council: "Now
the United States believe that they are investigators, they are
attorneys, judges and they are the executioners ... The unilateral
actions are imperialistic actions. The USA is not interested in
international law; they ignore it when it is inconvenient to them".
But this was just a warm-up lap.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:27:05 +0000
From: "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward(a)gmail.com>
To: jim bell <jdb10987(a)yahoo.com>
Cc: CypherPunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Subject: Re: What is the value of the State?
Message-ID:
<CAMjeLr-s_7ZUzqDW6gbXZNCqxt=cRa_1J+mbghRjbxRKdSb4=Q(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>That's some good bit o' history.
> It was you who asked the question "Without a State, would we have
> electronics? Radio?"
Yes and I was being serious. I hadn't encounted that history before.
>> I was really referring to the level
> of existing order needed to create *more* levels of order.
> That sounds like gobbledygook to me. What do you mean by this? What
is a
> "level of order"?
It's not gobbledygook at all. Just as single-cellular life gave rise
to multi-cellular life, a new LEVEL of order was made beyond the cell.
In this sense, you could say all the problems that we've been having
with "the State" are birthing pains bringing about the solutions to
solve this endless conflict at the current level.
Einstein was credited with saying "You can't solve the existing
problems at the same level which created them" (or something like
that).
It could surmised that no amount of "self-oganization" could create
that transformation seen in biology -- it had to be a GOVERNOR of some
kind. By which I intimate that leadership, with a greater view of it
all, can generate better, meaningful, and virtuous levels of order and
that it HAD to happen at some point in the past, in order to give rise
to the mammalian life which we cherish..
> And why do you (apparently) think that government is
> somehow necessary (or even desireable) to act as a driver of technology.
I
> think the opposite is true.
It's not that government is the driver, it is simply a large force
that can assemble huge amounts of resources and human effort to solve
problems. You would never get equivalent levels of order in an
anarchic situation. It would take some extreme urgency bording on
panic to assemble such forces (because anarchists don't want to join
someone else's causes, right?).
>> I don't
> think it's possible to argue with that.
> Until we actually UNDERSTAND what you meant, how can someone argue?
>
>>But I like the sentiment. I think the problem is more than the State.
> What problem?
The problem that is often simply labled "the State."
\0x
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:29:35 +0000
From: "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward(a)gmail.com>
To: Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net>
Cc: cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
Subject: Re: What is the value of the State?
Message-ID:
<CAMjeLr8f22Oe2ouDBxMDnr_JhLsYq=nV0-W0FHsPCBYWLe=Wsw(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> Yet, they haven't "self-organized" to come together and FIX the
>> problem in their own self-interest, have they? So there either is an
>> error in the analysis or there is some EXISTENTIALLY OTHER force that
>> prevents it that is not of this world --otherwise they would come
>> together and knock it down. But because of it's other-dimensional
>> nature, it is completley "invisibile" to them or unfamiliar, and don't
>> know how to approach the problem.
>
> Yes - notwithstanding ones preferred conception of the problem, or
> the source of the problem, what's an approach to tackling that which
> we struggle to put into words and apparently affects "most people"?
>
> For starters, can we identify attributes/experiences on a personal
> level which verify or point to, this problem? I'm thinking confront -
> when one is intercepted by police for something trivial like driving
> 9km/hr over "the speed limit", and one decides to boldly speak to
> said police and firmly put them in their immoral place (in the
> conversation that is) - one can tend to experience certain
> physiological twitches, gut-based electricity flows, and or a mild
> heat rising through the spine.
The solution to this challenge is to be a better Statist than they
are. That is, to know your law better, which (fortunately becuase of
the IQ level of most cops) isn't that hard. Once you know your rigths
and go through the hard knocks of jail time, you start to rise above
it. That's how and why I've written HACK THE LAW.
\0x
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 15:11:32 +0000
From: "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward(a)gmail.com>
To: juan <juan.g71(a)gmail.com>
Cc: cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org
Subject: Re: What is the value of the State?
Message-ID:
<CAMjeLr_bnOa_WTN0mEVbqtewvPjtEjiassoOn63n62i-Te-t3w(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> The solution, then, is a META-state. A system of order bigger and
>> better than the State.
>
> Yes. How could we have missed such an obvious solution.
Easy tiger. Hopefully, the other posts clarify. Obviously the State
sucks, but it sucks because of THE PEOPLE, don't forget that. And
what is going to remain after the fall of the State? THE PEOPLE.
> What's needed is a META-STATE. with JESUS AS PRESIDENT and the
> raving lunatic marko dynamite as VICE-PRESIDENT.
Yer getting a little fringe here. Take a chill pill, Dave.
> And no, there's no need for 'congress' cause the 'laws' have
> all already been written and they are in THE BIBLE.
You're on a roll!
> Last but not leat, the META-STATE will provide FREE homeopatic
> mierdicine.
Please, holistic medicine is already (relatively) FREE (because of the
benefits it provides to all). Holistically! Sing with me.
\0x
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 11:57:02 -0400
From: Joshua <joshua2014(a)protonmail.ch>
To: CypherPunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Subject: [CypherPunks] Event Invitation (May 23, 2017 - New York, New
York)
Message-ID:
<pVl3Y6I_cmhnZuR2Alu3WyDQGmebJIu074sso7_
GlMTEDWojLp7qsm9p3bf4qOVuxwscZCwsD4-NpVHTYxl1YdSsIYkxqgGLQiYspHJhtTk=@
protonmail.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
If you're interested in Bitcoin and are also interested in building out
independent economic systems powered by artificial intelligence or whatever
then you should come.
Free food, drinks, and pleasant conversation.
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/social-and-fireside-chat-
sponsored-by-zen-tickets-34280315346
movrcx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=rVwR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
https://icontherecord.tumblr.com/transparency/odni_transparencyreport_cy2016
Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Use of National Security
Authorities for Calendar Year 2016
May 2, 2017
In June 2014, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) began
releasing statistics relating to the use of critical national security
authorities, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
(FISA), in an annual report called the Statistical Transparency Report
Regarding Use of National Security Authorities (hereafter the Annual
Statistical Transparency Report). Subsequent Annual Statistical
Transparency Reports were released in 2015 and 2016.
On June 2, 2015, the USA FREEDOM Act was enacted, codifying a
requirement to publicly report many of the statistics already reported
in the Annual Statistical Transparency Report. The Act also expanded
the scope of the information included in the reports by requiring the
DNI to report information concerning United States person search terms
and queries of certain FISA-acquired information, as well as specific
statistics concerning information collected pursuant to call detail
records. See 50 U.S.C. § 1873(b).
Today, consistent with the USA FREEDOM Act requirements to release
certain statistics (codified in 50 U.S.C. § 1873(b)) and the
Intelligence Community’s (IC) Principles of Intelligence Transparency,
we are releasing our fourth Annual Statistical Transparency Report
presenting statistics on how often the government uses certain
national security authorities.
