- cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org

[pfiir at pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']
by You Fags 06 Aug '17

06 Aug '17

> Razer g2s at riseup.net > Sun Aug 6 10:07:56 PDT 2017 > > I'd dox that > What a wierd fettish you anarcho-commie-leftists have with tattletelling. "Oh yeah, well, I'm gonna tell your Mom !" Seems like the see eye aylmao op to man-child niggers has been working out fine. "Keep talking shit, natsee, that dumpster is gonna get it, you'll see !" Lol, larpanon.

1 0

[pfiir at pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']
by You Fags 06 Aug '17

06 Aug '17

> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com > Sun Aug 6 02:17:59 PDT 2017 > >goo gull >right wing >free market >capitalism >non-mooslims are bad >fact >f-a-c-t fact > Do you get paid per word, or are you just as dumb as the rest of these niggers ? Capitalism is good. Everything else is bad. How hard is that, haramanon ?

1 0

Re: [Cryptography] How to find hidden/undocumented instructions
by grarpamp 06 Aug '17

06 Aug '17

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo(a)me.com> wrote: > On Aug 2, 2017, at 22:49, grarpamp <grarpamp(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This is nice work. These sort of fuzzers and searchers need a >> distributed network version to cover more space deeper and faster. > > I attended his talk at DEF CON. I’m not sure if it’s in the slides, but he can do a full run in a day or less by using multiple cores and with some nice optimizations, so I don’t think we need any distributed network. Define "full run". Brief read of paper seems the software is not designed to exhaust all possible instructions... ie: from 0x0 to 0xf.... Even if some distributed platform did, which would be good research project, it would not come close to knocking the doors of any hidden Easter Eggs as the potential trigger combinations there are much more vast. #OpenFabs, #OpenHW, #OpenSW

2 1

832 TB ZFS on Unix
by grarpamp 06 Aug '17

06 Aug '17

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14936649

1 0

Cypherpunk Desert Bus: Zcash Trusted Setup Ceremony
by grarpamp 06 Aug '17

06 Aug '17

Cypherpunk Desert Bus: Zcash Trusted Setup Ceremony https://petertodd.org/2016/cypherpunk-desert-bus-zcash-trusted-setup-ceremo… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zcash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerocoin https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/6a26rh/peter_todd_having_doubts_ab… Peter Todd and I have been going back and forth on the Zcash ceremony last October and whether it could have been compromised. He officially signed off on everything but is now having some doubts after the Intel AMT vulnerability. He now thinks it could have been possible for the setup DVD's to have been altered and he is planning on checking them which he still has control over. Pretty interesting developments still unfolding on twitter as both of us discuss this. @PeterToddBTC @BRBillionaire https://z.cash/blog/the-design-of-the-ceremony.html https://www.zcashcommunity.com/2017/07/31/zcash-separating-fact-fiction/ https://github.com/zcash/zcash/issues/2247 https://github.com/zcash/mpc/blob/master/README.md http://zclassic.org/ https://zensystem.io/ https://www.reddit.com/subreddits/search?q=zcash https://www.reddit.com/search?q=zcash&sort=top https://hn.algolia.com/?query=zcash http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/zcash-truly-anonymous… https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/audio.wnyc.org/radiolab_podcast/ra… Last November, journalist Morgen Peck showed up at her friend Molly Webster's apartment in Brooklyn, told her to take her battery out of her phone, and began to tell her about The Ceremony, a moment last fall when a group of, well, let's just call them wizards, came together in an undisclosed location to launch a new currency. It's an undertaking that involves some of the most elaborate security and cryptography ever done (so we've been told). And math. Lots of math. It was all going great until, in the middle of it, something started to behave a little...strangely. https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6rqvdg/announcing_bcash_a_new_cryptoc… https://medium.com/@freetrade68/announcing-bcash-8b938329eaeb https://www.reddit.com/r/DarkNetMarkets/

1 0

[pfir@pfir.org: [ PFIR ] More on the internal Google doc being widely discussed in the media today]
by Zenaan Harkness 06 Aug '17

06 Aug '17

Lauren genuine concerned about the culture of pretense at Google (see below). We absolutely MUST NOT tolerate alternate political views which seek diversity of alternate political views! Leftist Diversity is an absolute biological necessity almost on the level of species survival (for a Liberal Lefty), where genitals are something you think about and sincerely, seriously, try to resolve your issues, inner conflicts and emotions regarding. Any suggestion that there is a difference between a penis and a vagina, and ESPECIALLY any suggestion that there is no difference between someone who's got one and someone who's not sure but thinks they might want one, MUST NOT BE TOLERATED !!!!!!!! Good, now that we've cleared up these important facts, we're all on the same page with Lauren. :O)D)- (Because smileys are nothing but a social construct.) ----- Forwarded message from "PFFR (People For Finternet Responsibility) Announcement List" <pffr(a)pffr.org> ----- Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 14:25:07 -0700 Subject: More on the internal Google doc being widely discussed in the media today More on the internal Google doc being widely discussed in the media today https://plus.google.com/+LaurenWeinstein/posts/j4qsLr7sCua I am very disappointed to learn that the internal Google doc re diversity issues -- apparently an opinion piece by a single author, NOT Google policy -- has been leaked in its entirety. I can't see any valid justification for such a leak regardless of how negatively most Googlers may disagree with its content, and in my view this threatens the culture of internal openness and discussion at Google that is extremely important both to Google and ultimately to Google's users.

1 0

CryptoBadger DGAF
by grarpamp 05 Aug '17

05 Aug '17

2 1

Re: [tor-talk] Tor ban discussion at Russian state Duma
by grarpamp 05 Aug '17

05 Aug '17

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:59 PM, krishna e bera <keb(a)cyblings.on.ca> wrote: > Followup: laws passed. > > " > President Putin has signed a law that, as of November 1st, bans > technology which lets you access banned websites, including virtual > private networks and proxies. Internet providers will have to block > websites hosting these tools. > ... > > Accordingly, the President has signed another law requiring that chat > apps identify users through their phone numbers after January 1st, 2018 > " > > https://www.engadget.com/2017/07/30/russian-censorship-law-bans-proxies-and… This is very poor, as the fundamental concepts of society and interpersonal as we know it require to have private comms on various things, this rational extend from in person to over distance. We have no human capability to even imagine nonprivate world, let alone spy world, as is not human. So fuck RU and FVEY... they idea are not human but maniac. Resist. Do crypto. Do political action for human.

2 2

But you knew that right? "Your 'Anonymous' Browsing Data Isn't Actually Anonymous"
by Razer 05 Aug '17

05 Aug '17

> Eckert's first task with the data was to find out if her browsing data > was included in the dataset. To do this, she queried the data for the > URL linked with her company's login page, which generates a unique ID > for each employee. Germany has a population of about 82 million, so > the odds that Eckert herself was in browser data collected from 3 > million Germans was small. Although it turned out her browser history > wasn't in the data set, by querying the data for her company's login > page Eckert discovered that a number of her colleagues were in the > data by matching the unique login IDs from the company's page to the > individuals. > > With this information, Eckert would've been able to see her > colleagues' entire browsing history for the last month. One of the > colleagues included in the dataset was a close friend of hers, and she > reached out to him to let him know that she had his browsing history. > The question she had was which browser plugin was collecting and > selling this data. > > To answer this question, Eckert had her colleague delete one browser > plugin every hour until he disappeared from the live data. On the > seventh plugin, he disappeared. This suggested that the plugin > collecting and selling his browser data was, ironically enough, called > Web of Trust, which offers "free tools for safe search and web browsing." > > The troubling thing about Eckert and Dewes' de-anonymization technique > is that it can be used on anyone who has a public social media > presence. For their report, Eckert and Dewes focused on Twitter and > the German LinkedIn equivalent, Xing, to see if they could use these > public profiles to de-anonymize public figures in the data. > > When you click on your analytics page on Twitter, this brings you to a > URL that includes your public Twitter handle—Xing has a similar > feature. This means that Eckert and Dewes were able to query the > database for these publicly available Twitter URLs for German politicians. > > If the politicians were included in the dataset, the next step was to > visit the Twitter profile of the politician and collect a few of the > links they had recently posted. By using these links, coupled with the > public Twitter URL, Eckert and Dewes were able to pull an individual's > entire month-long browsing history from the anonymous dataset. > > As Dewes pointed out when he and I spoke at Def Con, it requires an > astonishingly small amount of browsing information to identify an > individual out of an anonymous dataset of 3 million people. Since > everyone's browsing habits are unique, it only takes about 10 website > visits to create a "fingerprint" for an individual based on which > websites they are visiting and when. > https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/gygx7y/your-anonymous-browsing-d…

3 4

L4nguage and anonymity
by Georgi Guninski 04 Aug '17

04 Aug '17

L4nguage and anonymity: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/04/to_preserve_online_anonymity_make_y… https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.03736.pdf

3 2