> Spooky spookymcspookface
> Thu Mar 1 10:23:00 PST 2018
> fedpost
> not breaking links
If yur gonna pretend to be me you need to do more research, faggot.
[Pic related]
Previously, on 24:
+Politician and Police want to have a second high profile shooting in
their county and meet to select date/time. (http://archive.is/hkpKO)
+Alphabet Soup gets a tip on a "suspicious comment" that N. Cruuz made
about wanting to be a "professional pool pooter". They leave him in
place to become the patsy. (http://archive.is/eU9Az)
+Teachers receive training and are notified a simulated incident will
occur. (http://archive.is/pJeMy#selection-2671.0-2671.178)
Feb 14:
+Students at Majority Stoned at High School have an evacuation drill in
the morning. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFly5Ut5Jag)
+Cruuz shows up on campus via an Uber Taxi for unknown
reasons.(http://archive.is/O0jbm)
+Hired team of 2-3 pooters goes into the pool and frills kids with Cruuz
on campus. (https://youtu.be/zlhMGWyT_uU)
+Girl sees Cruuz during the evacuation and speaks to him while hearing
thots fired elsewhere on campus.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R39tNfv_fg )
+For unknown reasons, hired pooters fail to execute Cruuz and stage his
zuicide.
+Students are evacuated and Cruuz leaves campus in the shuffle. ( See
Girl interview above ).
+Cruuz does not know the poorlice are after him and decides to go get
something to eat at McDonald's/Subway without knowing he is the
patsy.(http://archive.is/GOlmf)
+Glow-in-the-darks arrest him as he walks down a residential street on
his way home. (http://archive.is/8MfoN)
Feb 15:
+Cruuz is presented with a plea bargain that will let him avoid the
wreath penalty and avoid and real investigation/trial.
(http://archive.is/uAhPt)
+Cruuz pleads guilty to 17 counts of premeditated homocide even though
he has not frilled anyone.
Feb 16:
+Demolition of Majority Stoned at High School in Parkinglot, Fl is
announced to cover up the scene of the crime. (http://archive.is/p6UIl)
Pic related.
Is the son of spook in "crisis staging".
Cubed.
Give up your firearms, goy.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:43 AM, mick <mbm(a)rlogin.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:47:06 -0500
> grarpamp <grarpamp(a)gmail.com> allegedly wrote:
>
>> If ovh vps gives root, bypass the fee with: md(4) vnode > geli >
>> mount.
>>
>> Then again, if the iron isn't dipped in epoxy (not done), in your own
>> secure datacenter (not extant), on trusted #OpenHW (not AMD / Intel /
>> or any other to date), built in trusted #OpenFabs (non extant),
>> running validated #OpenSW (non extant), in a voluntarist libertarian
>> environment free from force, one's use case might be moot.
>>
>
> Gotta love you Grarpamp. :-)
>
> But in the real world we /have/ to trust someone, somewhere, somehow,
> sometime. What everyone has to decide for themselves is /how much/ trust
> to give, to whom, when, where and why. And that depends entirely on your
> threat model and your appetite for risk.
Sorry, but with decades of both plausible and exploited risk extant,
with however many million millionaires and significant billionaires,
and crowdfunding (further enhanced by the dawn of cryptocurrency
and all its new models that can be brought to bear)... there is no
rational reason to continue this global head in sand downplay and
refusal to get moving and start building #OpenHW in #OpenFabs.
The old goalpost of who, where, how, when, and how much open
and even explicitly proven trust exists in HW / Fabs simply must
start shifting for the better until it becomes the new "real world".
Further, such trust is profitable business model.
If kids can build home semiconductor labs making open IC's,
you can bet the above sponsors with those visionaries can
easily scale beyond a billion gates.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=home+semiconductor+fab
(Obligatory credit given to #OpenSW for at least being opensource,
but they're hardly under open validation programs yet either.)
> It would be a mistake to exclude Solar input from your consideration.
"Other than" is not exclusion.
> The links you gave don't belong to our project. I do agree with you on some points and a road map has been posted on the Bitcointalk since: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3021063.0
> https://www.reddit.com/r/UBIC/
> A white paper will also be released soon.
> Regarding your point of view about UBI you can also see it this way:
> The UBI reward you get after registering your passport is a little bit the way Bitcoin worked in the early days when one could mine it with his or her personal computer. Nowadays you can still mine on your computer, but even after a year the amount you would have mined wouldn't be enough to cover the costs for doing a single transaction.
> At the beginning Bitcoin was the money made by the people for the people. It has now become the money made by the mining farms for the speculative investors.
> With UBIC the majority of new coins will always be generated by the people and without wasting precious energy.
> There will also be no hyperinflation because the amount of monetary units created with every block is static and it doesn't increase when more people join.
Makes no difference what way anyone sees or sells it.
It's just another exotic coin distribution scheme that does
not create anything, records no share ownership of external
ROI producing entities, and can't pull in forex forever.
Further, there's no holdback for faux "investment", or leveling,
so early UBI'ers are made rich, while late's likely remain poor,
and each new pki'd user acts as a forceful tax upon
the "UBI" stream of existing participants.
Though presumably country payouts are population ratios.
Further, the "UBI" mining airdrop it claims to distribute is actually
nothing more than money printing dilution, continuous zero
shifting rebasement, or deflation if burnt... not truly income.
Which again, were it real exernally sourced income, has
growth limitations / unbalances / wars in a closed cycle.
> https://pkddownloadsg.icao.int/download
The E-passport pubkey sig verification / voting is interesting,
but can as easily be integrated and treated as a class
in any already existing mainstream coin tech.
Forcing "the masses" to fall to their knees before
force of governments to beg for passports to get
fake handouts... this will have problems, and be met with
resistance from various places, analysts, and movements.
Likely best to let agnostic coins work in open markets.
