September 2022 - cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org

Re: Peter Thiel Sucks Cock
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

On Sun, Aug 14, 2022, 5:46 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > .... >

1 0

Re: What's up
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Okay. Did you hear Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump know one another? Gunnar On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:44 AM Max Baumann <max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: > Stop copying others into our personal conversation. Thank you. > > Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device > *From:* g(a)xny.io > *Sent:* 10 September 2022 09:38 > *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com > *Cc:* cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org > *Subject:* Re: What's up > > Tomorrow. Jack asses. > > They know what I am talking 👄 about. > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:34 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > >> Max, >> >> The FBI thinks we are making fun of the Superintendent's September 11 >> board resignation from LendingClub.com. >> >> Gunnar >> >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:29 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >> >>> They leave me alone, for the most part.. >>> >>> Bank.org, this. Bank.org that. >>> >>> This would happen in Chelsea. >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:25 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>> >>>> Waxing the floor with the Queen. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:24 AM Max Baumann < >>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK noon. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>> *Sent:* 10 September 2022 08:56 >>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>> >>>>> Make it Noon? >>>>> >>>>> Between 11 and Noon. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 8:16 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So come here at 11. >>>>>> >>>>>> We will go walk the Highline. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 6:48 AM Max Baumann < >>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am but working on the Monday Denver meeting with colleagues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>> *Sent:* 10 September 2022 06:23 >>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:29 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would, you like me to call you King Charles? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gunnar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:27 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Me too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:22 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Great. Looking forward to seeing you. I will be sober and awake. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 22:14 >>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:50 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sure. Sleep well. >>>>>>>>>>> What time tomorrow - 11am? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 21:33 >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bed time. Tomorrow early. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:31 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are you awake and keen to talk? Will get into car now to >>>>>>>>>>>> 406W25th. EAT 21:45. I will probably not have network ... if you are around >>>>>>>>>>>> would you mind watching out for me outside? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device >>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 20:34 >>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No problems, daddy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 8:06 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't count on me today. I have not rested and am still out. >>>>>>>>>>>>> No end in sight. Will ping you later, probably, but might most likely just >>>>>>>>>>>>> fall asleep in an Uber and go to bed. In any event, tomorrow daytime is on, >>>>>>>>>>>>> as is Sunday. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device >>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 14:45 >>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, you let me know. I am here. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 2:44 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today late. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow daytime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still running around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 14:42 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* What's up >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How's it going? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meet up today or tomorrow? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>

1 1

Re: What's up
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Max, The FBI thinks we are making fun of the Superintendent's September 11 board resignation from LendingClub.com. Gunnar On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:29 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > They leave me alone, for the most part.. > > Bank.org, this. Bank.org that. > > This would happen in Chelsea. > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:25 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > >> Waxing the floor with the Queen. >> >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 9:24 AM Max Baumann < >> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >> >>> OK noon. >>> >>> >>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>> *Sent:* 10 September 2022 08:56 >>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>> >>> Make it Noon? >>> >>> Between 11 and Noon. >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 8:16 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>> >>>> So come here at 11. >>>> >>>> We will go walk the Highline. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022, 6:48 AM Max Baumann < >>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am but working on the Monday Denver meeting with colleagues. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>> *Sent:* 10 September 2022 06:23 >>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>> >>>>> I am up. >>>>> >>>>> Are you? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:29 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Would, you like me to call you King Charles? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gunnar >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:27 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Me too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:22 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great. Looking forward to seeing you. I will be sober and awake. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 22:14 >>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:50 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure. Sleep well. >>>>>>>>> What time tomorrow - 11am? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 21:33 >>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bed time. Tomorrow early. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:31 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you awake and keen to talk? Will get into car now to >>>>>>>>>> 406W25th. EAT 21:45. I will probably not have network ... if you are around >>>>>>>>>> would you mind watching out for me outside? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device >>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 20:34 >>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No problems, daddy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 8:06 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Don't count on me today. I have not rested and am still out. No >>>>>>>>>>> end in sight. Will ping you later, probably, but might most likely just >>>>>>>>>>> fall asleep in an Uber and go to bed. In any event, tomorrow daytime is on, >>>>>>>>>>> as is Sunday. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 14:45 >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: What's up >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Okay, you let me know. I am here. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 2:44 PM Max Baumann < >>>>>>>>>>> max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably: >>>>>>>>>>>> Today late. >>>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow daytime. >>>>>>>>>>>> Still running around. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device >>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* g(a)xny.io >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 9 September 2022 14:42 >>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* max.baumann(a)treehillpartners.com >>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* What's up >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How's it going? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Meet up today or tomorrow? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>

1 2

Fwd: [EXT] LendingClub: Current Board of Directors
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Anuj Nayar <anayar(a)lendingclub.com> Date: Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 11:36 AM Subject: Re: [EXT] LendingClub: Current Board of Directors To: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io>, Investor Relations <ir(a)lendingclub.com>, Press <Press(a)lendingclub.com> Hi Gunnar On September 11, 2021, in connection with her nomination to serve as superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, Adrienne Harris notified us of her resignation, effective September 12, 2021, from the Company’s Board. Details can be found in the 8k filed on 9/15/21 (below) https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001409970/bbc437e4-2920-4d5d-8e0… *From: *Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> *Date: *Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 9:37 AM *To: *Investor Relations <ir(a)lendingclub.com>, Press <Press(a)lendingclub.com> *Cc: *Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> *Subject: *[EXT] LendingClub: Current Board of Directors *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Madam or Sir: Good day to you. Surveying market research, I was wondering if you can kindly confirm, from LendingClub's July 15, 2021 press release: - Is Ms. Adrienne Harris currently a member of LendingClub's board of directors? - https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lendingclub-appoints-adrienne-harr… [prnewswire.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.prnewswire.com_new…> - Reviewing your website, Ms. Harris is not referenced: https://www.lendingclub.com/company/leadership - Bloomberg and other sources do not reference Ms. Harris as a LendingClub board member: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/LC:US [bloomberg.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.bloomberg.com_quot…> Sending you the very best regards. Thank you, Gunnar -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io [xny.io] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.xNY.io&d=DwMFaQ&c=z…> | Bank.org [bank.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__Bank.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=zW-…>* MSc [unic.ac.cy] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.unic.ac.cy_blockch…> - Digital Currency MBA [unic.ac.cy] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.unic.ac.cy_busines…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001 ------------------------------ This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the named addressee, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

1 0

Obstruction
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Mr. Weber: Should xNY.io - Bank.org be concerned with collusion or obstruction? Your answer on this could be historic. Thank you, Gunnar Gunnar Larson xNY.io - Bank.org

1 7

Re: ACLU Takes On Qualified Immunity In The 5th Circ.
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

1 0

Re: xNY.io - Bank.org: BitLicense STX, MIA Coin and NYCCoin Litigation (Application)
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Okay 👌 Thank you ⚡️✌️🦄 On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:57 AM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < team(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: > Gunnar, > > As stated previously, this issue is beyond the scope of this fund. > > Respectfully, > The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund Team > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:07 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > >> Dear Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund: >> >> How are you? I hope great. >> >> Kindly seeing if you had a moment to review this request? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Gunnar Larson >> xNY.io - Bank.org >> >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 5:17 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >> >>> Dear Bitcoin Developer Fund: >>> >>> Thank you for our recent correspondence. >>> >>> Today, I would like to clarify the following details to xNY.io - >>> Bank.org’s approach to Bitcoin innovation and our ultimate ask for >>> your support in our BitLicense strategic blueprint. >>> >>> May I also submit this as an international Blockchain Scholar looking to >>> help pioneer next generation Bitcoin development. >>> >>> Attached, kindly find xNY.io - Bank.org records requests considering >>> STX. Note, STX opeates as a POX scheme on top of the Bitcoin Blockchain. >>> >>> Out of New York, STX was approved for Coinbase custody that gave way to >>> CityCoins obvious abuse of the Bitcoin Blockchain, engaging the now failed >>> MIA Coin and NYCCoin projects. >>> >>> xNY (the token concepet) has documentation from the City of Miami and >>> United States Treasury confirming the probable cause for our concern that >>> STX's POX scheme abused the Bitcoin Blockchain to exasperate fraud of the >>> Mayor of Miami endorsing MIA Coin as a serious project. >>> >>> NYCCoin is something that the Mayor of New York had immunity from given >>> the BitLicense mandate. xNY.io - Bank.org has been found to be a true >>> borderless protector of Bitcoin and as you see in the attached, New Yorl is >>> half hearted to our reasonable approach to cultivate a pure approach to the >>> next generation of Bitcoin developers. >>> >>> We have a plan to all this and seek your assistance on the legal defense >>> to our BitLicense approach. >>> >>> Please advise if we may discuss this more. >>> >>> Warm regards, >>> >>> Gunnar Larson >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 10:08 AM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < >>> info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Gunnar, >>>> >>>> This doesn't appear to be a bitcoin developer-related matter and isn't >>>> without our fund's scope. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:39 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund: >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your email. Below is a summary of the matter. >>>>> >>>>> The USDP vs. USDD digital asset matter has become a unique delima for >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org considereding the New York BitLicense mandate. Our >>>>> approach has been attacked as opportunistic considering other marketplace >>>>> manipulation matters. >>>>> >>>>> We seek to learn your esteemed appetite of potential assistance on >>>>> this concern. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much, >>>>> >>>>> Gunnar >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> May 21, 2022 >>>>> >>>>> BY ELECTRONIC MAIL >>>>> >>>>> SpaceX Corporation >>>>> Board of Directors >>>>> One Rocket Road >>>>> Hawthorne, California >>>>> 90250 >>>>> Sales(a)SpaceX.com >>>>> >>>>> Re: Potential SpaceX Interlocking Directors’ Intent to Manipulate >>>>> Markets >>>>> >>>>> Dear SpaceX Board of Directors: >>>>> >>>>> From our New York headquarters, xNY.io - Bank.org embodies the notion >>>>> that rather than a merry-go-round, the process of change and innovation is >>>>> like a slide. >>>>> >>>>> Today’s memo aims to notify the SpaceX Corporation of concern of >>>>> potential market manipulation that could impact cross-border digital asset >>>>> innovation, free speech in the United States of America, the global ESG >>>>> economy and Moon exploration. We do not see this as a stereotypical >>>>> democrat versus republican battle (as Mr. Musk alludes). We see this as a >>>>> risk arbitrage matter for xNY.io - Bank.org’s profit (subject to regulatory >>>>> approval). >>>>> >>>>> Some may argue a scheme to leverage the protection of “free speech” >>>>> has led to Twitter deal advisors attempting a $44B LBO market manipulation >>>>> exercise. Further cause for reasonable concern is warranted if >>>>> similar intent is at play in the form of Tesla’s ESG scam claim. >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org indicators signal risk of possible intent to manipulate >>>>> public and private markets prompting clarification of the SpaceX >>>>> Corporation’s intent concerning Moon exploration and exploitation as a ESG >>>>> digital asset vault. >>>>> >>>>> To be very clear, SpaceX directors should understand xNY.io - >>>>> Bank.org’s work to protect cross-border digital asset innovation was born >>>>> before Twitter's prospective LBO. Our concern specific to the intent >>>>> of Twitter’s LBO deal makers is party to our work in New York to usurp >>>>> Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase board directors who may be potentially >>>>> engaged in similar market manipulation referenced here: >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org | DOJ Memo #4 - Goldman Sachs Deferred >>>>> Prosecution Agreement. >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org | Memo #2 - JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors >>>>> ESG Marketplace Manipulation. >>>>> 3. >>>>> >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org’s work also includes research into oil and >>>>> nickel marketplace manipulation as an ESG concern. >>>>> >>>>> The Twitter LBO includes Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase operating >>>>> as deal advisors. As referenced above, claims of Twitter robot scams and >>>>> claims of Tesla ESG scams display a pattern of questionable intent. xNY.io >>>>> - Bank.org asks SpaceX to clarify your board's intent concerning the Moon >>>>> and any connection to USDD (now in Moon phase). SpaceX directors may >>>>> agree that the Moon can also be defined as one of the most valuable ESG >>>>> digital asset vaults known to modern humanity. >>>>> >>>>> Protecting the Moon from exploitation is fundamental to Space >>>>> exploration. SpaceX is party to any potential Twitter deal maker >>>>> advisors that may exercise questionable intent risking the Moon’s ESG vault >>>>> potential. >>>>> >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org is concerned with interlocking directorate >>>>> syndicates that include SpaceX, Tesla, PayPal, Goldman Sachs and BitGo. >>>>> This setup breeds a galaxy of third and fourth party risk(s) at the >>>>> demise of pure cross-border digital asset innovation. Twitter robots >>>>> are not the focus of the Orlando Police Department Pension Fund, who >>>>> suggests that Twitter’s LBO is suspected of questionable intent as >>>>> potentially illegal. >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Mr. Musk’s ingenuity as an entrepreneur is historic and greatly >>>>> respected as a model inside our organization. As a Gates Scholar and >>>>> Blockchain Scholar holding international law distinction(s) The >>>>> concept of the Moon being an ESG digital asset vault is logic USDD >>>>> seemingly embodies. >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> For obvious reasons, we seek SpaceX’s board to confirm if the >>>>> intent behind your CEO’s Twitter LBO and Tesla ESG claims and if SpaceX is >>>>> party to a USDD type matter given your syndicate’s close association with >>>>> USDP. >>>>> >>>>> xNY.io - Bank.org kindly asks the SpaceX Corporation board of >>>>> directors to respond within 15 days of receipt of this correspondence. >>>>> Default in the form of no response within 15 days is not an extortion >>>>> technique on our part. Rather, it is a design benefit in disclosing our >>>>> intent post 15 days to ask for approval to engage New York’s False Claims >>>>> Act in response to SpaceX, Tesla, PayPal and Meta interlocking directors >>>>> potentially engaging in digital asset marketplace manipulation (exemplified >>>>> by USDP and USDD) that may exploit Space and Moon exploration at xNY.io - >>>>> Bank.org, PBC’s overall expense. >>>>> >>>>> Respectfully yours, >>>>> >>>>> Gunnar Larson | xNY.io <http://www.xny.io> - Bank.org >>>>> <http://bank.org> >>>>> MSc >>>>> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> >>>>> - Digital Currency >>>>> MBA >>>>> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> >>>>> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) >>>>> G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 9:06 AM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < >>>>> info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Gunnar, >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you please summarize the matter in plain text? >>>>>> >>>>>> - The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 6:23 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for your email. Please find the attached which I am >>>>>>> seeking your potential help with. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greatly looking forward to hearing from you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gunnar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>> From: *Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund* <info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> >>>>>>> Date: Thu, Jul 21, 2022, 8:50 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC >>>>>>> To: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gunnar, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you describe in more detail what you'd like to seek help with? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:15 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for your response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am a digital currency deveoper in New York and wonder if I may >>>>>>> seek help from the defense fund. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022, 3:58 PM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < >>>>>>> info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Gunnar, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We don't accept applications. We are a fund that simply exists to >>>>>>> defend bitcoin developers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:26 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey there: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My name is Gunnar Larson and I am part of the team at xNY.io - >>>>>>> Bank.org, PBC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We heard about the Bitcoin Defense Fund and was wondering if you are >>>>>>> considering potential applicants. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are based in Manhattan and are engaged in cross-border digital >>>>>>> asset innovation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing from you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gunnar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gunnar Larson >>>>>>> >>>>>>>

1 0

Fwd: xNY.io - Bank.org: BitLicense STX, MIA Coin and NYCCoin Litigation (Application)
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Cock suckers. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund <team(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> Date: Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:57 AM Subject: Re: xNY.io - Bank.org: BitLicense STX, MIA Coin and NYCCoin Litigation (Application) To: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> Gunnar, As stated previously, this issue is beyond the scope of this fund. Respectfully, The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund Team On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:07 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > Dear Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund: > > How are you? I hope great. > > Kindly seeing if you had a moment to review this request? > > Thank you, > > Gunnar Larson > xNY.io - Bank.org > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 5:17 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > >> Dear Bitcoin Developer Fund: >> >> Thank you for our recent correspondence. >> >> Today, I would like to clarify the following details to xNY.io - >> Bank.org’s approach to Bitcoin innovation and our ultimate ask for >> your support in our BitLicense strategic blueprint. >> >> May I also submit this as an international Blockchain Scholar looking to >> help pioneer next generation Bitcoin development. >> >> Attached, kindly find xNY.io - Bank.org records requests considering STX. >> Note, STX opeates as a POX scheme on top of the Bitcoin Blockchain. >> >> Out of New York, STX was approved for Coinbase custody that gave way to >> CityCoins obvious abuse of the Bitcoin Blockchain, engaging the now failed >> MIA Coin and NYCCoin projects. >> >> xNY (the token concepet) has documentation from the City of Miami and >> United States Treasury confirming the probable cause for our concern that >> STX's POX scheme abused the Bitcoin Blockchain to exasperate fraud of the >> Mayor of Miami endorsing MIA Coin as a serious project. >> >> NYCCoin is something that the Mayor of New York had immunity from given >> the BitLicense mandate. xNY.io - Bank.org has been found to be a true >> borderless protector of Bitcoin and as you see in the attached, New Yorl is >> half hearted to our reasonable approach to cultivate a pure approach to the >> next generation of Bitcoin developers. >> >> We have a plan to all this and seek your assistance on the legal defense >> to our BitLicense approach. >> >> Please advise if we may discuss this more. >> >> Warm regards, >> >> Gunnar Larson >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 10:08 AM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < >> info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gunnar, >>> >>> This doesn't appear to be a bitcoin developer-related matter and isn't >>> without our fund's scope. >>> >>> Regards, >>> The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:39 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund: >>>> >>>> Thank you for your email. Below is a summary of the matter. >>>> >>>> The USDP vs. USDD digital asset matter has become a unique delima for >>>> xNY.io - Bank.org considereding the New York BitLicense mandate. Our >>>> approach has been attacked as opportunistic considering other marketplace >>>> manipulation matters. >>>> >>>> We seek to learn your esteemed appetite of potential assistance on this >>>> concern. >>>> >>>> Thank you very much, >>>> >>>> Gunnar >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> May 21, 2022 >>>> >>>> BY ELECTRONIC MAIL >>>> >>>> SpaceX Corporation >>>> Board of Directors >>>> One Rocket Road >>>> Hawthorne, California >>>> 90250 >>>> Sales(a)SpaceX.com >>>> >>>> Re: Potential SpaceX Interlocking Directors’ Intent to Manipulate >>>> Markets >>>> >>>> Dear SpaceX Board of Directors: >>>> >>>> From our New York headquarters, xNY.io - Bank.org embodies the notion >>>> that rather than a merry-go-round, the process of change and innovation is >>>> like a slide. >>>> >>>> Today’s memo aims to notify the SpaceX Corporation of concern of >>>> potential market manipulation that could impact cross-border digital asset >>>> innovation, free speech in the United States of America, the global ESG >>>> economy and Moon exploration. We do not see this as a stereotypical >>>> democrat versus republican battle (as Mr. Musk alludes). We see this as a >>>> risk arbitrage matter for xNY.io - Bank.org’s profit (subject to regulatory >>>> approval). >>>> >>>> Some may argue a scheme to leverage the protection of “free speech” has >>>> led to Twitter deal advisors attempting a $44B LBO market manipulation >>>> exercise. Further cause for reasonable concern is warranted if similar >>>> intent is at play in the form of Tesla’s ESG scam claim. xNY.io - >>>> Bank.org indicators signal risk of possible intent to manipulate public >>>> and private markets prompting clarification of the SpaceX Corporation’s >>>> intent concerning Moon exploration and exploitation as a ESG digital asset >>>> vault. >>>> >>>> To be very clear, SpaceX directors should understand xNY.io - >>>> Bank.org’s work to protect cross-border digital asset innovation was born >>>> before Twitter's prospective LBO. Our concern specific to the intent >>>> of Twitter’s LBO deal makers is party to our work in New York to usurp >>>> Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase board directors who may be potentially >>>> engaged in similar market manipulation referenced here: >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> >>>> xNY.io - Bank.org | DOJ Memo #4 - Goldman Sachs Deferred >>>> Prosecution Agreement. >>>> 2. >>>> >>>> xNY.io - Bank.org | Memo #2 - JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors ESG >>>> Marketplace Manipulation. >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> xNY.io - Bank.org’s work also includes research into oil and nickel >>>> marketplace manipulation as an ESG concern. >>>> >>>> The Twitter LBO includes Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase operating as >>>> deal advisors. As referenced above, claims of Twitter robot scams and >>>> claims of Tesla ESG scams display a pattern of questionable intent. xNY.io >>>> - Bank.org asks SpaceX to clarify your board's intent concerning the Moon >>>> and any connection to USDD (now in Moon phase). SpaceX directors may >>>> agree that the Moon can also be defined as one of the most valuable ESG >>>> digital asset vaults known to modern humanity. >>>> >>>> Protecting the Moon from exploitation is fundamental to Space >>>> exploration. SpaceX is party to any potential Twitter deal maker >>>> advisors that may exercise questionable intent risking the Moon’s ESG vault >>>> potential. >>>> >>>> xNY.io - Bank.org is concerned with interlocking directorate syndicates >>>> that include SpaceX, Tesla, PayPal, Goldman Sachs and BitGo. This setup >>>> breeds a galaxy of third and fourth party risk(s) at the demise of >>>> pure cross-border digital asset innovation. Twitter robots are not the >>>> focus of the Orlando Police Department Pension Fund, who suggests that >>>> Twitter’s LBO is suspected of questionable intent as potentially illegal. >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> Mr. Musk’s ingenuity as an entrepreneur is historic and greatly >>>> respected as a model inside our organization. As a Gates Scholar and >>>> Blockchain Scholar holding international law distinction(s) The >>>> concept of the Moon being an ESG digital asset vault is logic USDD >>>> seemingly embodies. >>>> - >>>> >>>> For obvious reasons, we seek SpaceX’s board to confirm if the >>>> intent behind your CEO’s Twitter LBO and Tesla ESG claims and if SpaceX is >>>> party to a USDD type matter given your syndicate’s close association with >>>> USDP. >>>> >>>> xNY.io - Bank.org kindly asks the SpaceX Corporation board of directors >>>> to respond within 15 days of receipt of this correspondence. Default in the >>>> form of no response within 15 days is not an extortion technique on our >>>> part. Rather, it is a design benefit in disclosing our intent post 15 days >>>> to ask for approval to engage New York’s False Claims Act in response to >>>> SpaceX, Tesla, PayPal and Meta interlocking directors potentially engaging >>>> in digital asset marketplace manipulation (exemplified by USDP and USDD) >>>> that may exploit Space and Moon exploration at xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC’s >>>> overall expense. >>>> >>>> Respectfully yours, >>>> >>>> Gunnar Larson | xNY.io <http://www.xny.io> - Bank.org <http://bank.org> >>>> MSc >>>> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> >>>> - Digital Currency >>>> MBA >>>> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> >>>> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) >>>> G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 9:06 AM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < >>>> info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Gunnar, >>>>> >>>>> Could you please summarize the matter in plain text? >>>>> >>>>> - The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 6:23 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your email. Please find the attached which I am seeking >>>>>> your potential help with. >>>>>> >>>>>> Greatly looking forward to hearing from you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gunnar >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>> From: *Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund* <info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> >>>>>> Date: Thu, Jul 21, 2022, 8:50 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC >>>>>> To: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Gunnar, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you describe in more detail what you'd like to seek help with? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:15 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your response. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am a digital currency deveoper in New York and wonder if I may seek >>>>>> help from the defense fund. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022, 3:58 PM Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund < >>>>>> info(a)bitcoindefensefund.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Gunnar, >>>>>> >>>>>> We don't accept applications. We are a fund that simply exists to >>>>>> defend bitcoin developers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> The Bitcoin Developer Defense Fund >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:26 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey there: >>>>>> >>>>>> My name is Gunnar Larson and I am part of the team at xNY.io - >>>>>> Bank.org, PBC. >>>>>> >>>>>> We heard about the Bitcoin Defense Fund and was wondering if you are >>>>>> considering potential applicants. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are based in Manhattan and are engaged in cross-border digital >>>>>> asset innovation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking forward to hearing from you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gunnar >>>>>> >>>>>> Gunnar Larson >>>>>> >>>>>>

1 0

xNY.io - Bank.org | DOJ Memo #2 - Goldman Sachs Deferred Prosecution Agreement
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Mr. Marzulli: We have not heard back from the Feb.1 memo here asking about information concerning international peace and security. Mr. Marzulli, xNY.io - Bank.org will leave no stone left unturned on the corresponding Deferred Agreement, given it affects our global enterprise. When do you expect a answering any of our questions? Warm regards, Gunnar Larson https://docs.google.com/document/d/10BYgCtCf9F7A4YnhN792cTBU6P-pfdaOg0UTRbt… February 1, 2022 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. John Marzulli United States Department of Justice Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn New York, 11201 John.Marzulli(a)usdoj.gov Re: Memo #2 - Goldman Sachs Deferred Prosecution Agreement <https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1329926/download> Dear Mr. Marzulli: The Department of Justice has yet to respond to Memo #1 with our recent inquiry <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OsxfjN3TUepftKklopkQDSMwFWstWozuku4IPPu…> to the 1Malaysia Development Berhad Deferred Agreement. Goldman Sachs' Deferred Prosecution Agreement <https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/goldman-sachs-resolves-foreign-bribery…> with the United States of America is in potential breach, with ethical enforcement being concerned. Memo #2 aims to associate the malfeasance in Malaysia with the Middle East. The Bank of London vs. The Bank of London and the Middle East - November 30, 2021 two New York based firms lead investment in The Bank of London based in the United Kingdom. - July 1, 2007 The Bank of London and the Middle East opened in the United Kingdom. - The Bank of London and the Middle East confirms they have no association with The Bank of London (correspondence referenced here <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZLYO6qxOX5TIn0kPd69SQbvG-mn0I5R_/view?usp=…> ). The Bank of London seemingly has been funded from New York to irritate the Middle East. Recently, we made 91 highlights of research <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O2piNMJ3CI0wbfaFW33to3KhgOgZ8-dl/view?usp=…> associated with The Bank of London and the Middle East's recent sale to a firm in Kuwait. Harvey Schwartz is the Chairperson at The Bank of London, after spending over 20 years at Goldman Sachs Group, where he oversaw sales and trading, finance, technology, and operations. He completed his tenure as the firm’s President and Co-Chief Operating Officer. He joined Goldman Sachs in 1997 and subsequently held numerous senior leadership positions including Chief Financial Officer, Global Co-Head of the Securities Division, amongst other positions. He additionally served as a member of the firm’s Management Committee and co-headed its Risk Committee, Steering Committee on Regulatory Reform and Finance Committee. Mr. Schwartz established the firm’s Investment Policy Committee on which he also served as a member. It would appear that Mr. Schwartz has no friendly diplomatic agenda in London banking, potentially looking to profit off of The Bank of London and the Middle East. Furthermore, Goldman Sachs seemingly has a part in the scheme from New York. Bank of London and the Middle East is listed on the NASDAQ, Dubai. - Mr. Marzulli, during a recent telephone discussion together it was your general assessment that the Deferred Agreement in question was self policing. Can you kindly advise at your earliest convenience what (if any) DOJ systems, processes and control mechanisms are in place to monitor the purity of the Deferred Agreement? - Furthermore, if the Deferred Agreement is self-policing, can the DOJ kindly share any and all supporting material information that would prevent the agreement from being violated without the DOJ's general oversight? - Finally, we have made 28 highlights to Deferred Agreement <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yx88RMoeLyyfbNK0RtPl4r-m8N21_1Sp/view?usp=…> as a reference resource tool. Memo #1 and Memo #2 both outline instances that correspond with the associated highlight references. We are concerned that potential breaches to the Deferred Agreement are impacting our global enterprise. We are looking forward to learning more about the DOJ’s approach to assessing any potential breaches to the Deferred Agreement’s mandates. Respectfully yours with anticipation, Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io> | Bank.org <http://bank.org>MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107

1 3

Fwd: FBI Addresses Ongoing Threats Targeting Historically Black Schools and Institutions in Call with Partners
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: FBI <fbi(a)subscriptions.fbi.gov> Date: Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:50 PM Subject: FBI Addresses Ongoing Threats Targeting Historically Black Schools and Institutions in Call with Partners To: <g(a)xny.io> * National Press Releases * FBI Addresses Ongoing Threats Targeting Historically Black Schools and Institutions in Call with Partners The FBI and Department of Justice hosted a nationwide phone call with the victims, advocacy groups, and community leaders impacted by the ongoing threats targeting Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Historically Black Churches, and Historically Black Institutions. Sept. 9, 2022 Full Press Release <https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/fbi-addresses-ongoin…> ------------------------------ <https://www.facebook.com/FBI> <https://twitter.com/FBI> <https://www.youtube.com/user/FBI> <https://www.fbi.gov/e-mail-updates?utm_campaign=email-Immediate&utm_medium=…> * You have received this message because you are subscribed to one or more of the following categories: National Press Releases * Manage Subscription <https://delivery.fbi.gov/account-reminder> | Unsubscribe <https://delivery.fbi.gov/subscriber/c57956fe9830b3f02d21fe7a2581942df706f0b…> If you have questions about this service, email us at delivery(a)subscriptions.fbi.gov. Help <https://www.fbi.gov/e-mail-updates?utm_campaign=email-Immediate&utm_medium=…> | Privacy Policy <http://www.fbi.gov/privacy_policy?utm_campaign=email-Immediate&utm_medium=e…> | Visit FBI.gov <https://www.fbi.gov/?utm_campaign=email-Immediate&utm_medium=email&utm_sour…>

1 0