August 2022 - cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org

TWA-800: Shot Down By US Military [ref 9/11 UFO JFK etc Coverups]
by grarpamp 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

6 years old - 279 views. US Navy Sailor tells how TWA 800 was shot down. A true Holy Sh!t video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0vJFVm6Osk William Teele TWA-800 Downed USMil "upload_date": "20150718" https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnfVT07_75-mQvUEn9EUP1w https://twitter.com/willteele 88 Photos and videos southbayesupport.com Joined July 2013 Tweets 534 Following 624 Followers 102 Likes 1,072 William H. Teele III @willteele 21h Today is the day the @FBI lied to you!!! And as I continue to say I was there!! #TWA800. “Battle E” is the story! William H. Teele III @willteele 21h @kevinroose @TWAFlight800Doc @latimes @CNN @BBC William H. Teele III @willteele 21h https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=/R0vJFVm6Osk Truth to What Happen to TWA 800 19 years later, I have to tell it! May the good Lord continue to bless us ALL! William H. Teele III @willteele 21h https://www.pennlive.com/life/2022/07/dont-be-afraid-to-cry-remembering-the… ‘Don’t be afraid to cry’: Remembering the crash of TWA Flight 800 TWA Flight 800 left John F. Kennedy International Airport at 8:02 p.m. on July 17, 1996. At 8:31 p.m., the Boeing 747-100 exploded over East Moriches, New York, 12 miles off the coast of Long Island,... "text": "The Lord Jesus Christ is so wonderful and will heal whatever you have going on and give you forgiveness.", "time_text": "24 minutes ago", "author": "momislazy", "text": "Respect brother thank you for sharing you story so long ago. Just imagine all the recent videos with no views we cant find hidden by the algorithm exposing current events 😩", "time_text": "31 minutes ago", "author": "Starmade Productions", "text": "please stay safe man. telling the truth now a days paints a target on people unfortunately", "time_text": "59 minutes ago", "author": "Toyo", "text": "Thank you my friend. You are a righteous man", "time_text": "59 minutes ago", "author": "bridgeheadprod", "text": "Wow", "time_text": "1 hour ago", "author": "John Job", "text": "Thank you William! You are a brave and extraordinary person for bringing this knowledge to the world. Your truth honors those who died and their families. I hope and I know your testimony will lead others. Never let weak men intimidate brave men!", "time_text": "4 hours ago", "author": "Jay", "text": "Thank you for putting this out there. I wish more like you could find the courage to speak up.", "time_text": "5 hours ago", "author": "sub dialect", "text": "I totally believe this man. I'd love to hear what the rest of CIC saw and heard that night. I feel bad for the poor FCman who fired the missile.", "time_text": "8 hours ago", "author": "Don Holt", "text": "I have names of all who knows including the shop that shot!", "time_text": "7 hours ago", "author": "William Teele", "text": "God bless you. Are you all right? You're a hero for sharing.", "time_text": "9 hours ago (edited)", "author": "jdennis187", "text": "I’m doing well, thank you. I am aware of what’s to come or been coming. I was warned the day it happened!", "time_text": "7 hours ago (edited)", "author": "William Teele", "text": "Blow up the truth in your face with the style I run with\nLike the Navy missile that shot down Flight 800 - Immortal Technique", "time_text": "12 hours ago", "author": "Serena Dawes", "text": "Stay safe my Navy brother ..", "time_text": "12 hours ago", "author": "Se7en", "text": "Take care brother.", "time_text": "13 hours ago", "author": "Chris Hricik", "text": "Hope God protect him and his family...", "time_text": "14 hours ago", "author": "Alexander Urena", "text": "I don’t Hope, I know! That’s what’s me doing this ever more so real. A living sacrifice.", "time_text": "7 hours ago", "author": "William Teele", "text": "Hope you are fine after revealing truth cause the truth can hurt.", "time_text": "1 year ago", "author": "garry weinberg", "text": "It truly do, especially since I’m in contact with one the fathers of a kids on the plane.", "time_text": "7 hours ago", "author": "William Teele", "text": "I do recall jazz great’s wife , Wayne Shorter was on plane. Again thanks for bravery. Things seem pretty blurry these days only because powers to be write the script. PEACE.", "time_text": "54 minutes ago", "author": "garry weinberg", "text": "god bless.....", "time_text": "6 years ago", "author": "Navy XA",

1 2

Cryptocurrency: PoW over PoS
by grarpamp 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

Privacy-enabled coins ftw! All commodities require energy. Since crypto is a commodity it can serve as global digital money. The economic function is to provide property rights to 8B people as well as a global settlement network that has already cleared $17T in 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIj-r7kR6N4 https://preview.redd.it/o04z31jyocn81.jpg?width=1199&format=pjpg&auto=webp&… Proof of Work is the most important innovation within blockchains and why blocks in blockchains even exist. The key aspects as to why Proof of work is so important and cannot be replaced by PoS are: 1) Fair Coin Distribution No scammy ICO , premine or instamine is created and miners are forced to sell most of their coins to cover the expense (mainly ASICs + electricity) which allows a fair distribution and competition in the minting process. 2) long term incentives With coins that have premines/instamines/ICOs the incentives are such that the creators benefit from pumping and dumping and creating more altcoins/ICOs to "fundraise" more rather than miners who have sunk infrastructure costs on mining a particular algo(The more we approach Moore's cliff the longer these time preferences become as we have been seeing) 3) Decentralization of Minting Since mining BTC is so competitive, profit margins are typically thin and thus new entrants that either use a better tool to mine (ASIC) or find cheaper sources of power(typically green due to the economics) can quickly gain market share making lasting monopolies difficult. Even if a main ASIC manufacturer appears to have a large market share we can see this quickly change due to a single malinvestment or a mistake when developing the newest ASIC. Power is a resource that comes from many sources and allows many locations around the world to remain competitive for unique reasons. 4) Sybil resistant Proof of work allows miners to order transactions where there are real tangible costs to transaction selection and fake nodes cannot simply flood the ecosystem in order to attack the network 5) Game Theory The game theory of Bitcoin is such that it is more profitable to mine bitcoin and secure the network than attack it because any attempt at a 51% attack or reorg the chain would quickly be caught once the attack was executed and the loss in resources would be profound. 6) Objective Security - Proof of work gives us an objective and measurable degree of security where risk assessments can be made with greater precision that isn't afforded with more subjective forms of security. 6) Less Regulatory Scrutiny - One critical aspect to how securities are defined and regulated by governments(for the USA research into "Howey Test" but other countries have similar regulations) deals with who controls the money/investment and a common enterprise profiting from it. Because Proof of work allows anyone to become a bank that mints and secures the network that no-one can control courts have already determined that Bitcoin cannot be considered a "security" and thus would not fall under those regulations like other coins/ICOs that lack Proof of Work. PoW alone is not the only determining factor on defining what is and isn't a security but an important one. 7) Incentives to resist centralization The game theory and incentives of Proof of stake all lead to centralization because there is no external need to compete for energy and efficiencies. The creators or large whales who buy into the coin will all form a controlling oligopoly who can simply collect taxes (fees) for no effort and censor with no effort unlike with proof of work Proof is stake has nothing at stake. They all try to somehow artificially make up for the fact there's no cost to attack. They're all basically trying to fake work without doing work. The slashing or whatever the preminers are calling it is after the fact. After the rich guys have forked off, which they can do because they're both producers and validators, they don't care about the value of that other chain left behind. The majority staked coins have already decided what's the main chain. Now if you want to overrule them, the CEO of that blockchain is going to need to repeatedly roll back and convince everyone to stick to the chain he decides by his authority as the valid chain. This has already been done after an embarrassing smart contract hack where the premine gang lost their coins. Proof of work attack cost is upfront cost and easily identifiable so the rogue miners will have lost money doing nothing except attempt a single double spend before nodes reject their blocks. Yes they can carry on attack for a long time and publish a long reorg which would have massive cost but a small fork choice change to automatically reject reorgs past certain number of blocks including any double spend will fix that. All it takes to overpower rogue miners in bitcoin is $50 rasp-pi rig. When security of blockchain depends on the coin created by itself and only people with staked coins can validate blocks, you're FUBAR when someone with enough coins wants to attack the chain or force changes to their own benefit. Moores cliff means old ASICs do not become obsolete as quickly. The newest ASICs are already down to 3nm , to put things in perspective Intels most expensive retail chips are still at 10nm , there really isn't that much more room for BTC ASICs to shrink which means decentralization of mining . There are also many fundamental misunderstandings people have towards the advantageous and disadvantageous in industrial mining. A few things you need to understand about mining – Chipmakers like TSMC and Samsung as 2 examples (Soon to add intel to this list) are the ones that are commissioned to make most ASIC chips(not the full assembled ASIC miner) based upon designs from Bitcoin ASIC manufactures. These foundries are involved in diverse chip making and obviously aren't directly involved in Bitcoin or its politics but fulfilling large orders from whoever commissions them. The most popular ASIC manufacturers for Bitcoin right now are Whatsminer, Innosilicon, Bitmain, Caanan, Ebit, and Ebang. Many more ASIC manufacturers exist but they come and go based upon merit in a highly competitive race. For example Bitfury used to be one of the best manufacturers , and now has very little market share. Bitmain used to dominate , and than made some poor design decisions (lead engineer left them) and now competes with at least 4 others for the most efficient ASICs. This is a highly competitive and changing ecosystem. Large miners main advantage is economies of scale over smaller miners. If you are an ASIC manufacturer you have large advantage over others because you can premine off your newest hardware and sell you last generation ASICs to others. This does occur , but is simplistic view and not the full picture. The reality is ASIC manufacturers Sell their newest ASICs with partners for industrial mining , sell their latest hardware to smaller miners for a premium, and mine themselves, while at the same time selling older ASICs on the market. Why do they do this? Because ASIC manufacturing is highly competitive and they need to hedge their investments as quickly as possible and de-risk from regulatory concerns as well. Amateur mining doesn't come with many risks of manufacturers who come and go (they are forced to make huge investments in ASIC orders and have long development pipelines fraught with risks) Amateur mining does not have the overhead of employees , security, regulatory compliance, building costs, tax liabilities , etc... Now here is what is interesting, this last generation of ASICs that went from 7nm to 5nm in size did not have the same efficiency jumps as previous drops. This is because 5nm is already at the edge of what can be done with silicone, we can possibly shrink down to 2-3nm but it gets extremely difficult as the gates start to get the size of a few atoms wide and quantum concerns and heat become a very big concern. Why is any of this important? In the past when ASICs went from 14nm to 12nm there was larger improvements in efficiencies which gave an advantage towards those who could manufacture and mine themselves and their partners. ASICs would become obsolete sooner 8 months to 1 year at times which makes it difficult for amateur miners to recoup their investment in an ASIC especially those that by the slightly older generation equipment. As moore's cliff approaches (we are already there as I don't see 2nm anytime soon) this means that this latest generation of ASICs will have a much longer shelf life which means the variable above is much less important and the greater importance is a complex mix of what sort of electrical rates you can get - overhead costs. Now remember what I said about the advantageous of amateur mining. Industrial mining has other advantageous too like economies of scale and specialization but many disadvantageous as well. What this ultimately means is we are entering a period of commoditization in mining(the opposite of centralization). The economics force this direction. industrial miners will still exist but more and more amateur miners will enter the ecosystem. Eventually new companies will be also created that create products to recycle the waste heat (already exists , but prices will start to drop considerably for consumers) In POS, as far as I understand, any small time player can stake and get the same return on investment a huge whale would get. The largest whales will always get more and more stake for 0 effort due to collected fees from staking which is proportional to their stake . Thus even if you equally distribute all the stake initially it will become centralized over time. https://youtu.be/bBC-nXj3Ng4 https://youtu.be/ncPyMUfNyVM The "environmental impact of using electricity" seems very pedantic and cherry picks cases for criticism. There are countless other uses of electricity in the world which no one is talking about which provide very little contribution to societies. People are so brainwashed it's sad, when presented with a system to move away from the global rot of fiat currencies and central banks, as well as solving the unbanked crisis (to name but 2 crucial benefits). All they can talk about is energy use. Nothing of value can exist without energy. "Physics of value". How much energy do sport events use and environmental damage do they cause, for entertainment purposes. God forbid humanity uses some of it's electricity so countries can have financial security and protection from the countless financial crashes imposed on the populous. No let's stick with the same corrupt and limiting system which only serves the 1% I.e. those living furthest up stream and closest to the source. Excellent logic, at least you'll all be able to blame your respective governments for the continued increase in cost of living, lack of access to education, housing, food and energy. Because of course....these issues couldn't possibly be linked to the current system for value exchange and "wealth preservation". No let's stick with the debasement of fiat currencies and the completely unbalanced distribution of economic gain leading us to war and social unrest. Yeah that sounds so much better for the planet. Our children will be eternally thankful we were too manipulated to create a better future. Privileged middle and upper class people living in the developed world can easily ask; "Yeah, but, do we need to use so much energy for something that presently provides so little benefit?" But try asking someone in Africa, South America and any of the other financially ravaged countries where people have their fiat savings taken away by governments the same question. I think you'll get a far better answer from them than you will on Reddit. As for energy think of how much energy countries, people and creatures require to protect themselves. Is the amount of military spending carried out by America and Europe useful energy consumption. I would argue yes, you cannot protect your way of life without energy and force. Again, physics, energy and force. You require energy for protection, most things require energy to exist. You are falling straight into the elitist trap of daring to tell people what they can use their energy for which they either create or purchase. Very slippery slope which will not end at Bitcoin mining. The Bitcoin network requires energy to protect itself, the energy to protect it's network participants stake. It's never been hacked. The most secure digital network with a non biased approach to users and participants, accessible 24/7, border-less and with no single point of failure. No to think about it, you're completely correct, there's no benefit to such a digital facility in an ever increasing digital age with debasement of fiat and soaring inflation. This narrative will be proven baseless eventually like so many other misinterpretations of positive developments in human history. The lies and manipulation always get uncovered in the end, just a shame so many people have to suffer as a consequence of propaganda and conformist indoctrination. Those opposing it are supporting oppression on the unbanked and those impoverished by their centralised currencies and governments. But Bitcoiners are the ones being questioned on their ethics and morals. How beautifully ironic this tale currently is.

1 1

Cryptocurrency: Buterin Admits Ethereum Will Censor
by grarpamp 16 Sep '22

16 Sep '22

https://techaint.com/2022/08/16/vitalik-buterin-wishes-to-burn-the-ethers-o… Not surprising coming from the chain that forked off from the real Ethereum in order to rollback and censor transactions years ago. Route around their censorship by adopting privacy coins...

1 2

xNY.io - Bank.org | DOJ Memo #1
by Gunnar Larson 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

Mr. Marzulli: Memo #1 here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OsxfjN3TUepftKklopkQDSMwFWstWozuku4IPPu… Why on Earth should the Deferred Agreement be our problem. We expect DOJ guidance on this serious matter. I love you too, Gunnar -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>* MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001

1 3

A Gang Of HackRFs Makes For A Wideband SDR | Hackaday
by jim bell 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

https://hackaday.com/2022/04/01/a-gang-of-hackrfs-makes-for-a-wideband-sdr/ (Oleg Kutkov] decided to build a wideband SDR – for satellite communication research and monitoring, you know, the usual. He decided on a battery of HackRF boards – entire eight of them, in fact. Two 1×4 and one 1×2 RF splitters and an LNA on their combined RF input made for a good start to the project, and from there, it only got more complex. HackRF boards can be synchronized with a separate clock source, but you can’t just pull a single clock line to all of them in a star configuration. Thus, he’s built a clock distribution and amplifier board, with 4 ns propagation delay at 1 PPS, and only 10 ns delay at 10 MHz. Then, he integrated that board with the HackRF setup, adding a case, wiring up a purpose-built cable and dealing with the reflections that occurred. HackRF boards are USB 2.0 and able to generate a stream of data up to 320 MB/s, and there’d be no viable way to aggregate eight 2.0 links into one. To solve that, he’s used eight separate PCI-E to USB 3.0 cards, each of them with one HackRF plugged in, all connected to an AMD Ryzen 9-powered PC through PCI-E risers we typically see used for mining purposes. To tie it all together, he created a gnuradio flowgraph and patched the osmocom source block to enable the external clock synchronization mechanisms he decided to use.

2 2

xNY.io - Bank.org | DOJ Memo #2 - Goldman Sachs Deferred Prosecution Agreement
by Gunnar Larson 10 Sep '22

10 Sep '22

Mr. Marzulli: We have not heard back from the Feb.1 memo here asking about information concerning international peace and security. Mr. Marzulli, xNY.io - Bank.org will leave no stone left unturned on the corresponding Deferred Agreement, given it affects our global enterprise. When do you expect a answering any of our questions? Warm regards, Gunnar Larson https://docs.google.com/document/d/10BYgCtCf9F7A4YnhN792cTBU6P-pfdaOg0UTRbt… February 1, 2022 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. John Marzulli United States Department of Justice Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn New York, 11201 John.Marzulli(a)usdoj.gov Re: Memo #2 - Goldman Sachs Deferred Prosecution Agreement <https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1329926/download> Dear Mr. Marzulli: The Department of Justice has yet to respond to Memo #1 with our recent inquiry <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OsxfjN3TUepftKklopkQDSMwFWstWozuku4IPPu…> to the 1Malaysia Development Berhad Deferred Agreement. Goldman Sachs' Deferred Prosecution Agreement <https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/goldman-sachs-resolves-foreign-bribery…> with the United States of America is in potential breach, with ethical enforcement being concerned. Memo #2 aims to associate the malfeasance in Malaysia with the Middle East. The Bank of London vs. The Bank of London and the Middle East - November 30, 2021 two New York based firms lead investment in The Bank of London based in the United Kingdom. - July 1, 2007 The Bank of London and the Middle East opened in the United Kingdom. - The Bank of London and the Middle East confirms they have no association with The Bank of London (correspondence referenced here <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZLYO6qxOX5TIn0kPd69SQbvG-mn0I5R_/view?usp=…> ). The Bank of London seemingly has been funded from New York to irritate the Middle East. Recently, we made 91 highlights of research <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O2piNMJ3CI0wbfaFW33to3KhgOgZ8-dl/view?usp=…> associated with The Bank of London and the Middle East's recent sale to a firm in Kuwait. Harvey Schwartz is the Chairperson at The Bank of London, after spending over 20 years at Goldman Sachs Group, where he oversaw sales and trading, finance, technology, and operations. He completed his tenure as the firm’s President and Co-Chief Operating Officer. He joined Goldman Sachs in 1997 and subsequently held numerous senior leadership positions including Chief Financial Officer, Global Co-Head of the Securities Division, amongst other positions. He additionally served as a member of the firm’s Management Committee and co-headed its Risk Committee, Steering Committee on Regulatory Reform and Finance Committee. Mr. Schwartz established the firm’s Investment Policy Committee on which he also served as a member. It would appear that Mr. Schwartz has no friendly diplomatic agenda in London banking, potentially looking to profit off of The Bank of London and the Middle East. Furthermore, Goldman Sachs seemingly has a part in the scheme from New York. Bank of London and the Middle East is listed on the NASDAQ, Dubai. - Mr. Marzulli, during a recent telephone discussion together it was your general assessment that the Deferred Agreement in question was self policing. Can you kindly advise at your earliest convenience what (if any) DOJ systems, processes and control mechanisms are in place to monitor the purity of the Deferred Agreement? - Furthermore, if the Deferred Agreement is self-policing, can the DOJ kindly share any and all supporting material information that would prevent the agreement from being violated without the DOJ's general oversight? - Finally, we have made 28 highlights to Deferred Agreement <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yx88RMoeLyyfbNK0RtPl4r-m8N21_1Sp/view?usp=…> as a reference resource tool. Memo #1 and Memo #2 both outline instances that correspond with the associated highlight references. We are concerned that potential breaches to the Deferred Agreement are impacting our global enterprise. We are looking forward to learning more about the DOJ’s approach to assessing any potential breaches to the Deferred Agreement’s mandates. Respectfully yours with anticipation, Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io> | Bank.org <http://bank.org>MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107

1 3

xNY.io - Bank.org | Memo #2 - JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors ESG Marketplace Manipulation
by Gunnar Larson 04 Sep '22

04 Sep '22

May 1, 2022 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Investor Relations Board of Directors, JPMorgan Chase & Co. 277 Park Avenue New York, NY 10172-0003 JPMCinvestorrelations(a)jpmchase.com Re: JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors ESG Marketplace Manipulation Dear Board of Directors: xNY.io - Bank.org recently contacted JPMorgan Chase’s board of directors to communicate our concern(s) that potentially JPMorgan Chase may be engaging in exploitation of more than $100B of ESG asset liabilities, across international regulatory arbitrage structures, while headquartered in Manhattan. Specifically, the duty to promote the success of the company is that a director must act in the way that she considers, in good faith, and would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole. - Failure by a board to adequately consider ESG-related risks, particularly entity-specific compliance risks such as breach of securities laws, could serve as the basis for liability of individual directors or officers for breach of their fiduciary duties. Given JPMorgan’s five cout felonies, xNY.io - Bank.org is concerned with your board of director governance in preventing ESG fraud. xNY.io - Bank.org’s assessment of JPMorgan’s board embraces fundamentals including liquidity risk and protecting New York ESG cross border innovation from marketplace manipulation. - According to JPMorgan’s August 2021 Sovereigns and ESG whitepaper, the bank states that governance carries the largest weight of the three ESG pillars across scores, as it is the most empirically relevant for asset prices. - JPMorgan notes that philosophically, the bank views good governance as a foundational pillar for positive ESG developments in other pillars. Today’s memo follows protocol suggested by the United States of America, in that JPMorgan Chase’s board of directors is responsible to xNY.io - Bank.org’s enterprise and the Department of the Interior, in connection with any action alleging a violation of the Endangered Species Act, by any person (“person” means an individual, corporation, partnership, trust, association, or any other private entity) claiming the benefit of any exemption or permit under the Act, who shall have the burden of proving that the exemption or permit is applicable, or has been granted, and was valid and in force at the time of alleged violation. xNY.io - Bank.org has made 91 highlights to the Department of Interior’s Endangered Species Act for JPMorgan Chase’s board of directors reference. 1. xNY.io - Bank.org has reason to believe in the JPMorgan Chase board of directors’ engagement of ESG marketplace manipulation, risking your ESG portfolio’s future at the cost of New York digital asset innovation. 2. xNY.io - Bank.org references your 2021 Environmental Social and Governance Report, totaling $117B of ESG “development funding” transferred from New York to Caribbean and Eastern European accounts. 3. xNY.io - Bank.org is concerned of JPMorgan Chase board directors leveraged marketplace manipulation techniques in allocating ESG funds to engage in potential harassment (the term "harassment" means any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance) of some of the world’s most precious endangered species protected by domestic and international governance. 4. JPMorgan Chase’s $2.3B ESG “wind farm” facility is characterized by the Washington Post as a potential misuse of ESG assets (and board policies) to fund probable violation(s) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. Looking internationally, xNY.io - Bank.org is concerned of further ESG marketplace manipulation structures, sacrificing endangered species, via JPMorgan Chase’s board directed ESG investments in the Caribbean (your largest ESG investment region). xNY.io - Bank.org signals that JPMorgan’s board of directors is party to the Convention on Nature Protection and Wild Life Preservation in the Western Hemisphere. Being clear, any violation of the Endangered Species Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act and/or the Convention on Nature Protection and Wild Life Preservation in the Western Hemisphere … Requires xNY.io - Bank.org to consult JPMorgan Chase board members on ESG allocations that may be in conflict with construction, or other development projects, or other forms of economic activity. xNY.io - Bank.org asks JPMorgan Chase board directors to return the Secretary of Department of the Interior’s approval, confirming licensing and/or exclusion to the Endangered Species Act, with further authorization of “harassment” pursuant to exemption(s). Including (if available) a similar Environmental Protection Agency permit that is applicable and is valid and in force. - Due to the riskiness of ESG portfolio mismanagement in violation of the Endangered Species Act, ESG marketplace manipulation risk(s) may trigger causal shocks to New York State monetary and regulatory innovation. - According to JPMorgan’s sovereign fund ESG research, “A common complaint about ESG analysis is that data can be difficult to source. Some sovereign data is in fact more readily available than corporate data given the multitude of multinational organizations and NGOs – including the World Bank, the IMF and the United Nations.” - The European Central Bank provides support to the eurozone sovereign debt market but has more restrictions on what and how much it can buy, so eurozone bonds can trade with more credit risk premium compared to other major developed market bonds. - Whatever the case may be, JPMorgan disclosures detail significant concern of lapse in board governance and ESG portfolio risk with potential violation of the Endangered Species Act, risking ESG portfolio default(s) in Europe and the United States risking ESG customer financial abuse. Forbes recently profiles JPMorgan Chase ESG investments as problematic, highlighting that your board of directors potentially are allocating ESG proceeds in competition with human rights at the expense of customers’ best interests while investing heavily in fossil fuels. A letter to JPMorgan Chase’s board of directors from ESG scholars (including, The Sierra Club, Public Citizen, Greenpeace, Amazon Watch, Revolving Door Project, Rainforest Action Network and the Center for International Environmental Law) suggests the bank would “...lock us into energy sources that are overly expensive and subject to wild price swings, and that exacerbate rather than ease global conflict.” xNY.io - Bank.org aims to protect ESG digital asset innovation and JPMorgan’s board should understand your proprietary ESG scoring matrix should signal seismic marketplace manipulation risk if directors are in potential violation of any Endangered Species Act covenant. - Head of Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) distribution at JP Morgan Asset Management says, “In Europe, we do not have a semi-transparent product – like the US and Australia – which would add further complexity to the trading. For example, the US has several models which make it harder for the AP to guess what the actual fund looks like and therefore the costs might be higher accordingly.” - Given, JPMorgan may potentially be in breach of United States Endangered Species Act provisions, similar risk of ESG asset failure(s) may include Europe, Middle East, Africa and Australia international law, as ratified by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. While directors and officers are likely to be particularly focused on the risk that they may be found personally liable for a breach of their duties, proper ESG compliance with fiduciary obligations requires acting to a higher standard. Given the defenses available to fiduciaries, and the difficulty in bringing claims for breach of fiduciary duty, a director or officer found to be liable for such ESG breaches will generally have acted egregiously. This ‘sliding scale’ of the standards to which directors and officers should adhere. Following the Endangered Species Act, xNY.io - Bank.org kindly petitions JPMorgan’s board of directors, in connection with all ESG investments, claiming the benefit of any exemption or permit under the United States Department of the Interior’s Endangered Species Act … Shall have the burden of proving that an exemption or permit is applicable, or has been granted, and is valid and in force. - At JPMorgan’s earliest convenience (within 60 days of receipt of this memo) xNY.io - Bank.org kindly requests a certified copy of JPMorgan Chase’s approval by the Department of the Interior, being a license and/or exclusion to the Endangered Species Act and/or the Marine Mammal Protection Act. - JPMorgan Chase suggests a commitment to anti-corruption compliance is central to the success of its business. Your board of directors stand to maintain that trust by promoting a corporate culture that encourages ethical business practices and compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the laws of the countries in which the JPMorgan conducts business. xNY.io - Bank.org’s research guidance from the United States Securities and Exchange Commision, supports the international community in taking actions to address ESG issues on a global basis, and those actions that can have a material impact on companies. Future correspondence concerning ESG innovation is at your board’s leisure. Respectfully yours with appreciation, Gunnar Larson | xNY.io <http://www.xny.io> - Bank.org <http://bank.org>, PBC MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107

1 1

Cypherpunks for open borders
by professor rat 03 Sep '22

03 Sep '22

This seems uncontroversial - open borders in the absence of a command economy and full-spectrum welfare ie national-healthcare-style state is decidedly pro-market, pro-freedom, and pro-peace. Certainly open-borders are as intrinsic to crypto-anarchism as diversity-of-tactics. That is certainly uncontroversial. It may be that some self-described cypherpunk might decide to advocate for border controls for some reason. The onus is then on them to prove their case. Such as in Jeff Berwick Vs John Galton However no crypto-anarchist will be caught dead arguing for nationalist borders; I promise youse.

4 3

Expletive redacted
by professor rat 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

The proper war is just commencing https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6797419-Exhibit-809-Notebook-3 Reposts brutal marsupial

1 0

Highly credible - fatally flawed - outstanding!
by professor rat 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

PDF unfortunately https://sgp.fas.org/jud/sterling/govt-exh-399.pdf Reposts not boomerangs

1 0