November 2019 - cypherpunks@lists.ogf.org

Section 12355 California Legal Code
by Ryan Carboni 23 Nov '19

23 Nov '19

(a) Except as provided in Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 12301), any person who assembles, maintains, places, or causes to be placed a boobytrap device as described in subdivision (c) is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years.

4 4

Obvious political methodology
by Ryan Carboni 23 Nov '19

23 Nov '19

When thousands of people in important positions throughout society think there should be an investigation that would inconvenience the reigning oligarchs to determine if a crime occurred, there is only two options: In a dictatorship, you shoot them. In a democracy, you would create a slight inconvenience to them to corroborate evidence and find witnesses. In economics, people do anticipate outcomes and make decisions based on that.

1 0

Judge Says The FBI Can't Keep Refusing To Confirm Or Deny The Existence Of Social Media Monitoring Documents | Techdirt
by jim bell 23 Nov '19

23 Nov '19

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20191119/13132743414/judge-says-fbi-cant-… --- SmartNews How will this affect FOIA applications on Cypherpunks data?

1 0

Cryptocurrency: Dark Side of Silk Road (Documentary 2019)
by grarpamp 23 Nov '19

23 Nov '19

Silk Road by Barely Sociable https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpMP6Nh3FvU

1 0

NIST on AES Payoff
by grarpamp 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/gcr/2018/NIST.GCR.18-017.pdf

2 2

partial list of US military agents working for the fake anonimity mafia (tor and accomplices)
by Punk-Stasi 2.0 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

https://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ndss13-freewave.pdf "The Internet is playing an ever-increasing role in connecting people from across the world, facilitating the free circulation of speech, ideas and information. This poses serious threats to repressive regimes as it elevates their citizens’ awareness and provides them a powerful medium to arrange coordinated opposition movements. The recent unrest in the Middle East [1] demonstrates the very strong power of the Internet in arranging nation-wide protests that, in several cases, resulted in revolutionizing or even overthrowing repressive regimes." list of scum criminals responsible for the above propaganda is Amir Houmansadr, Thomas Riedl, Nikita Borisov, Andrew Singer from the academic-fascist cesspools 'university of texas at austin' and 'university of illinois'

2 2

Amblin Memer: "slightly retarted" goy-prince Andrew "takes one for the team", media ignores Ghislaine Maxwell - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

As always, "the West", to find sanity -without- submission to Islam, needs the CIA's orphanages and blackmail program, to be dismantled and for blackmail to be handled first and foremost - on a societal level. It used to be homosexuals that were the prime blackmail targets... By allowing and facilitating such blackmail, and by "being entertained" by such circus shows as Prince Andrew playing "slightly retarded goy", TPTB behind the scenes maintain their control over the power to print our money. Thus the endless shit show called "Western principles" paraded across millions of dead brown humans ever since World War II. Without a CONTROL mechanism, "we the people" would never consent to this one devious little troll tribe printing all our money and sending bucket loads of it to "our greatest foreign agent". As Amblin Memer points out: "I’m now convinced that the bizarre interview http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/prince-andrew-resigns-after-bizarre-disaster-… with the Prince was purposefully ridiculous so they could push all the focus onto this goy, while the actual Mossad agent who served as Jeffrey Epstein’s handler and “madam,” Ghislaine Maxwell, http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/jeffrey-epsteins-alleged-madam-is-the-daughte… is still on the loose and not being discussed in the media. We still don’t even know where the bitch is. https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/21/jeffery-epsteins-ex-girlfriend-ghislaine-max… ... It’s all a gigantic farce. On it goes... Jew Lawyers for Jew Epstein’s Victims Demand Sweatless Prince Talk to the FBI http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/epstein-victims-demand-sweatless-prince-talk-…

1 0

tor stinks, take #376031
by Punk-Stasi 2.0 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

https://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/usableTor.pdf "Experts such as Bruce Schneier [1] recommend utilizing Tor to combat government surveillance. " which is kinda curious considering this fact : "All low-latency systems as currently designed and deployed are essentially broken against The Man" signed : scum-master syverson, supreme leader of the tor mafia. [1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/09/how_to_remain_s.html ps : oh wait, piece of jew shit schneier is a barefaced joke openly mocking the retards who pay attention to what he says. Who would have tought it!

1 0

The US military has 24 hours to arrest the people investigating me
by Ryan Carboni 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

The US military has 24 hours to arrest the people investigating me, these people are going to get you all killed.

1 0

Forced Decrypt: 5th Amndt Does Forbid says US State PA Supreme Court
by grarpamp 22 Nov '19

22 Nov '19

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/11/victory-pennsylvania-supreme-court-ru… https://www.eff.org/files/2019/11/20/commonwealth_v._davis_-_majority_opini… https://www.eff.org/files/2019/11/20/commonwealth_v_davis_-_amicus_brief_00… https://www.eff.org/document/state-v-andrews-eff-aclu-aclu-nj-amicus https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/02/highest-court-indiana-set-decide-if-y… https://www.eff.org/files/2019/02/01/brief.pdf The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a forceful opinion today holding that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from being forced to disclose the passcode to their devices to the police. In a 4-3 decision in Commonwealth v. Davis, the court found that disclosing a password is “testimony” protected by the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination. EFF filed an amicus brief in Davis, and we were gratified that the court’s opinion closely parallels our arguments. The Fifth Amendment privilege prohibits the government from coercing a confession or forcing a suspect to lead police to incriminating evidence. We argue that unlocking and decrypting a smartphone or computer is the modern equivalent of these forms of self-incrimination. Crucially, the court held that the narrow “foregone conclusion exception” to the Fifth Amendment does not apply to disclosing passcodes. As described in our brief, this exception applies only when an individual is forced to comply with a subpoena for business records and only when complying with the subpoena does not reveal the “contents of his mind,” as the U.S. Supreme Court put it. (For more on the foregone conclusion exception, see this post on a similar case currently pending in the Indiana Supreme Court.) The Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed with EFF. It wrote: "Requiring the Commonwealth to do the heavy lifting, indeed, to shoulder the entire load, in building and bringing a criminal case without a defendant’s assistance may be inconvenient and even difficult; yet, to apply the foregone conclusion rationale in these circumstances would allow the exception to swallow the constitutional privilege. Nevertheless, this constitutional right is firmly grounded in the “realization that the privilege, while sometimes a shelter to the guilty, is often a protection to the innocent.” This ruling is vital because courts must account for how constitutional rights are affected by changes in technology. We store a wealth of deeply personal information on our electronic devices. The government simply should not put individuals in the no-win situation of choosing between disclosing a password—and turning over everything on these devices—or instead defying a court order to do so. At least two other state supreme courts, in Indiana and New Jersey, are considering similar cases. EFF is participating in both of those cases as amicus along with the ACLU. With the victory in Pennsylvania, and several other courts set to weigh in, there’s a significant chance the U.S. Supreme Court will have the last word. We hope that like the Pennsylvania court, the Supreme Court recognizes just how fundamental the Fifth Amendment right is.

3 2