I think that Mr. Frissell's suggestion falls into the category of what I've humbly termed "digital flash paper" mechanisms. My highly esteemed legal opinion is that this could be considered criminal obstruction of justice
I call it a network operating system designed to cope with local security breaches. I am not required by law to keep business records in any particular jurisdiction. I am not even required to have access to everything in a business with which I am connected.
such a charge might be preferrable to one of Sedition :-)<<<
But a charge of Sedition is such a rare honor. It's tough to get the Feds to bring one. One Sedition trial during WWII and one against White Supremicists a few years back. Feds lost both. Besides, if the system is run by non-Americans outside of the US, sedition can't apply (can it? - no treason certainly). (Mike McNally) Duncan Frissell
Duncan Frissell writes:
I call it a network operating system designed to cope with local security breaches. I am not required by law to keep business records in any particular jurisdiction. I am not even required to have access to everything in a business with which I am connected.
Of course you're likely to be right; my Highly Esteemed legal opinion is worth about as much as the electrons transmitting it.
But a charge of Sedition is such a rare honor ... Besides, if the system is
participants (2)
-
Duncan Frissell -
m5＠vail.tivoli.com