I agree with Eli Brandt that Chael Hall's simple implementation of a standard "kill" line is preferable to the complicated "Regexp" specification. I could manage it, but I agree with Eli that many could not. Eli offers an alternative of Signature-Lines: <count> Assuming that this can be inserted in the body of the message with the :: convention as well as among the headers, this is acceptable, but is still more complicated than the "kill line". The proper number for "signature-lines" will have to be found by trial and error, by sending messages to oneself. One caveat here. Any remailer which implements "signature-lines" will have to -remove- that line from the header (or change <number> to zero) when it removes the <number> of signature lines from the end of the body. Otherwise, a chain of "signature-lines" remailers would -each- see the "signature-lines" header and would -each- remove <number> lines from the end of the message body. -- edgar@spectrx.saigon.com (Edgar W. Swank) SPECTROX SYSTEMS +1.408.252.1005 Silicon Valley, Ca