25 May
1993
25 May
'93
1:18 p.m.
Since all possible finite bit strings are, by definition, contained in the unending cavalcade of bits in pi,
Definition? I have seen not this asserted even by theorem. Not surprising, since the statement is patently false. There are 2^{\aleph_0} finite bit strings, and only \aleph_0 of those are subsequences of pi.
Um, it doesn't follow to me that it's _obvious_ that 2^Aleph_0 is larger than Aleph_0. It might be- but I'd like to see the proof. Now, Aleph_0 ^ Aleph_0, on the other hand... -Bill (wondering why this thread of recursively nonenumerable transfinite ordinal stuff keeps cropping up in *all* his mailing lists)