I write:
This seems to me to be a very robust pseudonymous mail system which could be implemented by relatively minor changes to the existing Cypherpunk remailer structure.
Eli
This appears to be the ARA system that was previously suggested, which I was speaking of using with penet. Your comment that changes would be needed implies that it is different; if so, could you clarify the difference?
No, evidently I wasn't reading carefully enough. These do appear to be the same.
The reason Eric suggested hanging this off the side of a pseudonym server is that it is rather inconvenient in its pure form,
Although I would suggest making the raw data available to those who
wish to bypass the nym server for some reason. Say, a
"Request-Routing-Header