* Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS
Uu> The problem may be the Fidonet addressing. Many times I have tried to
Uu> send mail to people with mailing addresses like M's, and not had the
Uu> mail get through. I don't know what the rules are but perhaps some
Uu> systems can get it and some can't.
Note that _this_ message goes through an RBBS/UUCP gate. The problem
remains, however. On the other hand, I just noted a sheepish message
about the remailer@rebma.mn.org being ill for the past couple of weeks,
which would explain my failures with that system.
Uu> I'd suggest to M. that he take one of the systems that does respond to
Uu> his remailing requests, and have that be the LAST one in a chain of
Uu> two. So, he could send to, say, hh@cicada.berkeley.edu, and follow
Uu> that with elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu. Perhaps this would get through:
An interesting experiment I shall try today, perhaps with this very
message. Thank's, Hal, for the input. I should like to see these
remailers popularized, along with encryption, as one of the best
political moves we cypherpunks can make. De-glitching them for broader
use may be a thankless task, but would be worth it if it results in
their general use.
Uu> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
P.S.: Have you heard anything of the alleged bug with version 2.3 being
unable to verify plaintext PGP signatures?
*********************************************************************
*