This is what I have. Stuart -----Original Message----- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_loughran@hpl.hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:38 PM To: 'cddlm-wg@ggf.org' Subject: [cddlm] namespaces as a followup to the phone call, if we are to submit this week's draft to the editor, we must have consistent namespaces by the end of the week. So: 1. what is the root URL we should use
2. what is the date extension we are all going to use
2005/02
3. accordingly, what will be the three consistent XSD/WSDL namespaces for the various specifications. cdl cmp api or (dapi) -Steve
Stuart Schaefer wrote:
This is what I have.
Stuart
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_loughran@hpl.hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:38 PM To: 'cddlm-wg@ggf.org' Subject: [cddlm] namespaces
as a followup to the phone call, if we are to submit this week's draft to the editor, we must have consistent namespaces by the end of the week.
So:
1. what is the root URL we should use
2. what is the date extension we are all going to use
2005/02
3. accordingly, what will be the three consistent XSD/WSDL namespaces for the various specifications.
cdl cmp api or (dapi)
Ok. so http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/cmp/2005/02 and not, as we have right now http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02 Or we can have longer names for the URIs. http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/events/2005/02/ http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/events/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/wsdl/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/xmlcdl/2005/02 Also, should that be 2005/02 or 2005/06 to be up to date with the june conference.
I am moving to the following namespaces http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/events/2005/02/ http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/events/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/wsdl/2005/02 The only one I am unsure about is the CDL namespace. On the most recent copy of the CDL spec that I have to hand, the URL is http://www.girdforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0 This is from the document; I assume that it is a typo and that it should be http://www.gridforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0 Even, then, it is different from Stuart's proposed scheme, but if the CDL is already submitted, we have to flow with it. I would note that would be good if at some point in the future we could actually host the XSD at the various locations, even though there is no requirement to do so -a lot of XML parsers expect to fetch XSD from the (resolved) URI Dejan, can I flag up namespace consistency as an issue, something we need to address as a group to avoid shipping inconsistent documents. -steve
participants (2)
-
Steve Loughran -
Stuart Schaefer