Ayla, <wsdl:binding> and <wsdl:service> elements do not belong in a standards document. They are left for you to define in your concrete implementation. The WSDL document simply defines the normative portType and its messages. OK, the order of <wsdl:imports> is supposed to be at the top. It is not validated by the systems I am using. I fixed that and checked it in. I also fixed the typos you pointed out. Please let me know if this is OK. Stuart _____ From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 5:17 PM To: Stuart Schaefer Cc: cddlm-wg@ggf.org Subject: Re: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model Stuart, I've tested it performing the following changes to make it work with Muse until the point I could go before: - I've included a <wsdl:binding> element (even do not complete for all the operations in the port type) and a <wsdl:service> element - I've put the <wsdl:imports> before the <wsdl:types> declaration - I've corrected the targetNamespace value in: <xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/componentsi/2005/02/wsdl " <http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/componentsi/2005/02/wsdl> > to <xsd:schema elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02/wsdl" <http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02/wsdl> > - I've corrected the typo <wsdl:fault name="StateActiontFault" message="cmpw:StateActionFault"/> Best regards, Ayla Stuart Schaefer wrote: Ayla, Thank you for your feedback. I made these edits a little differently, and passed them through several validating parser-generators. Can you test the attached file? Staurt -----Original Message----- From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:11 PM To: Stuart Schaefer Cc: cddlm-wg@ggf.org Subject: Re: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model Hi Stuart, sorry for the delay. I still have some problems with the Component Model wsdl file that I'm trying to solve, but I will let you know about some errors that I've already changed here: * The targetNamespace used in the wsdl file was the same of the component-model.xsd. I've included the "/wsdl" at the end of the target namespace, and I've also declared "xmlns:tns" with this namespace. * The <wsdl:types> element of the wsdl is missing. In this part I import the schemas used. * The "taskActionResponse" message should be as follows instead of refering to "taskActionRequest": <wsdl:message name="taskActionResponse"> <wsdl:part name="taskActionResponse" element="cmp:taskActionResponse"/> </wsdl:message> * The "StateActionFault" message was missing: <wsdl:message name="StateActionFault"> <wsdl:part name="fault" element="cmp:StateActionFault"/> </wsdl:message--> * The "ComponentEndpoint" attribute wsrp:resourceProperties should be "wsrp:ResourceProperties" * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "GetResourceProperty", "SetResourceProperty", "QueryResourceProperties" and "GetMultipleResourceProperties" operations should be "wsrpw"(wsdl file) instead of "wsrp" (which would be the schema). * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "Destroy" operation should be "wsrlw" instead of "wsrl" * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "Initialize", "Terminate", "Run" and "RunTask" operations should be "tns" instead of "cmp". * There is a typo in the "Run" operation: "StateActiontFault" should be replaced by "StateActionFault" * In the "RunTask" operation, the "taskActionResponsne" should be "taskActionResponse" * wsdl:binding and wsdl:service parts are missing in the wsdl definition. Best regards, Ayla Stuart Schaefer wrote: Ayla, The Component Model document was updated to clarify this. The "Last Call" version changed the examples. Internal elements are not allowed. Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the property list. They cannot have child nodes. Please let me know about the wsdl errors. I will take a look as soon as you forward the details. Stuart -----Original Message----- From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:18 AM To: 'cddlm-wg@ggf.org' Subject: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model Hi, we are having some problems in understanding the correct use of control flow elements from the component model. According to the schema, the cmp:sequence and cmp:flow elements, cannot have internal elements (like in the 'delegate' declaration), but according to some examples from the component model Word document, components can be defined inside these elements. Which option is the correct one? We also had some problems in the component-model.wsdl, specially regarding namespaces use, message definitions missing and some typos. In another mail I will send more details about this. Best regards, Ayla