RE: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model
Ayla, The Component Model document was updated to clarify this. The "Last Call" version changed the examples. Internal elements are not allowed. Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the property list. They cannot have child nodes. Please let me know about the wsdl errors. I will take a look as soon as you forward the details. Stuart -----Original Message----- From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:18 AM To: 'cddlm-wg@ggf.org' Subject: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model Hi, we are having some problems in understanding the correct use of control flow elements from the component model. According to the schema, the cmp:sequence and cmp:flow elements, cannot have internal elements (like in the 'delegate' declaration), but according to some examples from the component model Word document, components can be defined inside these elements. Which option is the correct one? We also had some problems in the component-model.wsdl, specially regarding namespaces use, message definitions missing and some typos. In another mail I will send more details about this. Best regards, Ayla
Hi Stuart, the "Last Call" version according to my mails is the 'Draft 2005-06-09' sent on June 20th. Are you talking about this version? In this version, there are examples using internal elements and examples without them. Some of the examples must be checked because they are not well formed. Another problem is that in the repository, there are examples of valid cdls that are not valid anymore according to the component-model schema. Regarding the wsdl errors, I will wait your answer to be sure I'm working with the correct version. Ayla Stuart Schaefer wrote:
Ayla,
The Component Model document was updated to clarify this. The "Last Call" version changed the examples. Internal elements are not allowed. Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the property list. They cannot have child nodes.
Please let me know about the wsdl errors. I will take a look as soon as you forward the details.
Stuart
-----Original Message----- From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:18 AM To: 'cddlm-wg@ggf.org' Subject: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model
Hi,
we are having some problems in understanding the correct use of control flow elements from the component model. According to the schema, the cmp:sequence and cmp:flow elements, cannot have internal elements (like in the 'delegate' declaration), but according to some examples from the component model Word document, components can be defined inside these elements. Which option is the correct one?
We also had some problems in the component-model.wsdl, specially regarding namespaces use, message definitions missing and some typos. In
another mail I will send more details about this. Best regards, Ayla
Stuart Schaefer wrote:
Ayla,
The Component Model document was updated to clarify this. The "Last Call" version changed the examples. Internal elements are not allowed. Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the property list. They cannot have child nodes.
interesting. I think my current impl. will implicitly allow stuff inside the elements, as it tends to treat them just like any other elements. We need test cases of illegal declarations.
Hi Stuart, sorry for the delay. I still have some problems with the Component Model wsdl file that I'm trying to solve, but I will let you know about some errors that I've already changed here: * The targetNamespace used in the wsdl file was the same of the component-model.xsd. I've included the "/wsdl" at the end of the target namespace, and I've also declared "xmlns:tns" with this namespace. * The <wsdl:types> element of the wsdl is missing. In this part I import the schemas used. * The "taskActionResponse" message should be as follows instead of refering to "taskActionRequest": <wsdl:message name="taskActionResponse"> <wsdl:part name="taskActionResponse" element="cmp:taskActionResponse"/> </wsdl:message> * The "StateActionFault" message was missing: <wsdl:message name="StateActionFault"> <wsdl:part name="fault" element="cmp:StateActionFault"/> </wsdl:message--> * The "ComponentEndpoint" attribute wsrp:resourceProperties should be "wsrp:ResourceProperties" * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "GetResourceProperty", "SetResourceProperty", "QueryResourceProperties" and "GetMultipleResourceProperties" operations should be "wsrpw"(wsdl file) instead of "wsrp" (which would be the schema). * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "Destroy" operation should be "wsrlw" instead of "wsrl" * The prefix of the messages referenced in the "Initialize", "Terminate", "Run" and "RunTask" operations should be "tns" instead of "cmp". * There is a typo in the "Run" operation: "StateActiontFault" should be replaced by "StateActionFault" * In the "RunTask" operation, the "taskActionResponsne" should be "taskActionResponse" * wsdl:binding and wsdl:service parts are missing in the wsdl definition. Best regards, Ayla Stuart Schaefer wrote:
Ayla,
The Component Model document was updated to clarify this. The "Last Call" version changed the examples. Internal elements are not allowed. Flow control elements can only be defined as children of a node in the property list. They cannot have child nodes.
Please let me know about the wsdl errors. I will take a look as soon as you forward the details.
Stuart
-----Original Message----- From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:18 AM To: 'cddlm-wg@ggf.org' Subject: [cddlm] Doubts about Component Model
Hi,
we are having some problems in understanding the correct use of control flow elements from the component model. According to the schema, the cmp:sequence and cmp:flow elements, cannot have internal elements (like in the 'delegate' declaration), but according to some examples from the component model Word document, components can be defined inside these elements. Which option is the correct one?
We also had some problems in the component-model.wsdl, specially regarding namespaces use, message definitions missing and some typos. In
another mail I will send more details about this. Best regards, Ayla
participants (3)
-
Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid -
Steve Loughran -
Stuart Schaefer