Hi Steve, Please flag it as an open issue that we need to address on the ongoing bases until completely resolved. I believe that we can still change the CDL in the spec, if needed. Thanks, Dejan. PS BTW Below I do not see the difference in the last two namespaces you provide.

-----Original Message----- From: owner-cddlm-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-cddlm-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Loughran Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 6:04 AM Cc: cddlm-wg@ggf.org Subject: Re: [cddlm] namespaces

I am moving to the following namespaces

http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/events/2005/02/

http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/events/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/wsdl/2005/02

The only one I am unsure about is the CDL namespace. On the most recent copy of the CDL spec that I have to hand, the URL is

http://www.girdforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0

This is from the document; I assume that it is a typo and that it should be

http://www.gridforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0

Even, then, it is different from Stuart's proposed scheme, but if the CDL is already submitted, we have to flow with it. I would note that would be good if at some point in the future we could actually host the XSD at the various locations, even though there is no requirement to do so -a lot of XML parsers expect to fetch XSD from the (resolved) URI

Dejan, can I flag up namespace consistency as an issue, something we need to address as a group to avoid shipping inconsistent documents.

-Steve