Hi, Attached is the PDF, some people had problems opening it with OpenOffice. Thanks, Dejan.

-----Original Message----- From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:56 PM To: Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) Cc: cddlm-wg@ggf.org Subject: Re: [cddlm] FW: OASIS SDD-TC

Thanks Dejan,

Attached is a draft for SDD and ACS/CDDLM/JSDL discussion. I value your feedbacks. ---- Hiro Kishimoto

...

Hi Team,

Hiro will join us next meeting to discuss the topic addressed in the email below (SDD and ACS/CDDLM/JSDL). This will be a good opportunity to ask Hiro about his position wrt interoperability and standardization, as well as about other topics. BTW Hiro is

Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) wrote: the member

...

of the CDDLM mailing list, so you can start any discussion using email.

Best regards,

Dejan.

...

-----Original Message----- From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:22 PM To: Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) Cc: Stuart Schaefer; Jun Tatemura Subject: Re: OASIS SDD-TC

Thanks Dejan,

I agree with you. Please discuss at your meeting. I can join to answer

...

any question from your group if you like.

It is May 3rd Wednesday 6am PDT (= 10pm JST), right?

Thanks again, ---- Hiro Kishimoto

...

Thanks Hiro,

I personally think that this is a good idea. Please let us discuss this as a team at the next Wednesday meeting and I will get back to you thereafter. Again, personally I think that this is the right approach, but we are used to make decisions as a team and I

Milojicic, Dejan S (HP Labs) wrote: prefer to

...

do it this way again.

Best regards,

Dejan.

...

-----Original Message----- From: Hiro Kishimoto [mailto:hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 5:39 PM To: Dejan Milojicic; Stuart Schaefer; Jun Tatemura Subject: OASIS SDD-TC

Hi Dejan, Stuart, and Jun,

As you may already heard form Jun, OASIS SDD-TC (they are working on closely related technology; solution installation) is now calling for submission.

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=sdd http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sdd/200604/msg00027.html http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17882/oasis- sdd-requirements-v1.1.doc

Although their focus is non-grid domain, the last thing I would see is GGF and OASIS will publish two incompatible deployment standards and thus impose a unnecessary burden on both end users and software providers.

In order to avoid such worst case scenario, I think GGF should provide related GGF specifications for SDD-TC and ask them to consider. It does not mean CDDLM-WG should work with SDD-TC and modify or update your specs to meet their needs. Instead, just ask SDD-TC to make their spec compatible with CDDLM and another GGF's specs.

The following is the list of GGF's specs we would like to offer;

(1) Application Contents Service Specification 1.0 (2) CDDLM XML-CDL (3) CDDLM component model (4) Job Submission Description Language 1.0 (SDD-TC also covers required resource description)

We exclude CDDLM Deployment API since SDD-TC does not cover interface specification.

It is very important for OGSA and GGF in general to keep consistent with wider Web service community. For this reason, ACS-WG and JSDL-WG already agree to the above plan and we would like to hear your thoughts.

Thanks, -- Hiro Kishimoto