I want to get consistency on namespaces for the next round of documents, before those documents are finalised. I also want those namespaces used in all the test files I'm writing, and then I want the namespaces to stay frozen.The more test cases there are -in different places- the higher the cost of switching to new namespaces becomes. without inline validation of the .doc files, its also dangerously easy to be out of sync in the documents. I also think we ought to have a consistent structure/date for the namespaces, ideally one which can acually resolve at some time in the future to XSD documents, that being what some XML tools like. I am not going to state what I think the layout should be, but we need to be consistent and stable. After this next draft, we should leave the namespaces alone unless we have good reason to change them. Jun, Stuart, can we come up with consistent namespace naming/structure for the next drafts. What are your current namespaces? -steve