26 Jan
2005
26 Jan
'05
6:08 p.m.
[Answer] Requirements to SF-CDL and XML-CDL are by definition different (that's why we have two languages)... It may be a good idea to revisit these requirements issue, though.
I understand a part of the situation and am looking forward to seeing this mentioned in other documents, such as the CDDLM primer mentioned.
Jun - Thanks for the response to my comments - I think you missed a critical question realted to this though: Is the CDL semantics (for templates and references) identical to the SmartFrog semantics? I'm assuming the answer is "yes", otherwise I'm not clear how you would translate between them, but is this an explicit claim, and has it been verifide in any way? Thanks Paul