Jun, Thanks for your consideration on our comments. Jun Tatemura wrote:
Dear Team, Please find the attached file that lists comments/feedbacks with my answers and action lists (I apologize the list is not complete) which I would like to discuss on the call tomorrow.
I have no problem with your proposed resolutions.
- The language requirements are defined in each released document (foundation document / SF-CDL / XML-CDL) and they are slightly different each other. We will appreciate a bit clarification or justification for it.
[Answer] Requirements to SF-CDL and XML-CDL are by definition different (that's why we have two languages)... It may be a good idea to revisit these requirements issue, though.
I understand a part of the situation and am looking forward to seeing this mentioned in other documents, such as the CDDLM primer mentioned. Regards, Keisuke Fukui