I am moving to the following namespaces http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/components/events/2005/02/ http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/events/2005/02 http://www.gridforum.org/cddlm/deployapi/wsdl/2005/02 The only one I am unsure about is the CDL namespace. On the most recent copy of the CDL spec that I have to hand, the URL is http://www.girdforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0 This is from the document; I assume that it is a typo and that it should be http://www.gridforum.org/namespaces/2005/02/cddlm/CDL-1.0 Even, then, it is different from Stuart's proposed scheme, but if the CDL is already submitted, we have to flow with it. I would note that would be good if at some point in the future we could actually host the XSD at the various locations, even though there is no requirement to do so -a lot of XML parsers expect to fetch XSD from the (resolved) URI Dejan, can I flag up namespace consistency as an issue, something we need to address as a group to avoid shipping inconsistent documents. -steve