June 2005 - cddlm-wg - lists.ogf.org

Schema problems
by Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Hello, in order to see if the problem I had is with Muse or with the Schema, I've opened the component-model.xsd file with oXygen/, which is an xml editor that performs validation and the same error occurred regarding the complex types "ComponentLifecycleEvent" and "PropertyChangeEvent" when I asked oXygen to validate the document. Besides that, there was a problem with the xml-cdl namespace in this file that I have already reported to Steve. I'm only telling you this in case someone is changing this schema or has a newer version with these problems solved. Thanks again, Ayla >

1 0

Newer versions of xsds
by Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Hi, please, I would like to know how I can get the newest xml-cdl.xsd and component-model.xsd files? Using the ones from the last versions of the specification documents, after correcting namespaces, I get the error: "Content model violates the unique particle attribution rule" This error is thrown when the schema is ambiguous. Thanks in advance, Ayla

2 3

RE: [cddlm] Newer versions of xsds
by Stuart Schaefer 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Ayla, I am responsible for the component-model.xsd file. I have not opened it with Muse. I will try that and see what has changed/broken. The WS-Addressing schema has been a constant problem. We are aware of the discrepancies between the specifications. Our problem has been that MUWS uses a different set of specifications than some of the WSRF specifications we are using. Any change we make will seemingly cause some problem. It has been recommended that we update to the most recent versions of all specifications and continue to update as new specifications become available. Any suggestions? Stuart Schaefer -----Original Message----- From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid [mailto:ayla@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:39 PM To: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid Cc: cddlm-wg(a)ggf.org Subject: Re: [cddlm] Newer versions of xsds Hello, I've found the CVS repository under: http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=123256 but even replacing the component-model.xsd files, I continue with the same problem while using Muse:"Content model violates the unique particle attribution rule". I've got this problem before also with the xml-cdl.xsd, but replacing with the new one it did not happen. Has anyone else had the same problem? Is there a newer version of this file? Regarding ws-addressing, I've got confused, because the files point to an older version of ws-addressing, but they use a muws-1.0 version that points to the new one. In a previous mail Steve has said that you were aware of the changes in wsa. Are you planning to change the documents to the new version or it is this change that will lead to even more internal inconsistency, as said before? Best regards, Ayla Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid wrote: > Hi, > > please, I would like to know how I can get the newest xml-cdl.xsd and > component-model.xsd files? > Using the ones from the last versions of the specification documents, > after correcting namespaces, I get the error: > > "Content model violates the unique particle attribution rule" > > This error is thrown when the schema is ambiguous. > > Thanks in advance, > Ayla >

2 1

Meeting with OGSA, June 20th, 3-5pm PDT
by Milojicic, Dejan S 01 Jun '05

01 Jun '05

Hi Team, Please mark your calendars for the conference call with OGSA-WG on June 20th, 3-5pm. I presume that the following phone will be in effect (Hiro, please correct me if I am wrong): > Dial-in numbers for Wednesday: > Free: +1-888-452-0308 > Intl/Toll: +1-484-644-0505 > PIN: 71815 The intent of the meeting is to familiarize OGSA with our progress, to get their feedback, and agree on the next steps. Most importantly to plan our meeting at GGF with the OGSA-EMS architecture team. I plan to come up with a brief presentation or where we are, where we are going, etc. for the phone conference and carrying it over to GGF. Thanks again to Hiro for setting this up. Best regards, Dejan.

3 2

RE: [cddlm] Meeting with OGSA, June 20th, 3-5pm PDT
by Milojicic, Dejan S 01 Jun '05

01 Jun '05

Hi Walfredo, Yes, it is PDT time zone. Sorry, I put the time zone in the subject but not in the body of the email. Thanks, Dejan. ________________________________ From: Walfredo Cirne [mailto:walfredo@dsc.ufcg.edu.br] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:15 PM To: Milojicic, Dejan S Cc: cddlm-wg(a)ggf.org; Hiro Kishimoto Subject: Re: [cddlm] Meeting with OGSA, June 20th, 3-5pm PDT Hi Dejan!! Is it 3-5pm at your timezone? []s Walfredo Milojicic, Dejan S wrote: Hi Team, Please mark your calendars for the conference call with OGSA-WG on June 20th, 3-5pm. I presume that the following phone will be in effect (Hiro, please correct me if I am wrong): Dial-in numbers for Wednesday: Free: +1-888-452-0308 Intl/Toll: +1-484-644-0505 PIN: 71815 The intent of the meeting is to familiarize OGSA with our progress, to get their feedback, and agree on the next steps. Most importantly to plan our meeting at GGF with the OGSA-EMS architecture team. I plan to come up with a brief presentation or where we are, where we are going, etc. for the phone conference and carrying it over to GGF. Thanks again to Hiro for setting this up. Best regards, Dejan.

1 0

Meeting minutes
by Milojicic, Dejan S 01 Jun '05

01 Jun '05

Hi, We ahd a short meeting this morning, with only Jun and myself in attendance (we did not expect Steve). Consequently, the meeting minutes are short as well. 1. Jun had some comments on the Component spec and he will directly follow-up with Stuart, 2. Dejan Scheduled the following sessions at the GGF: Joint specs review session CDDLM-WG. preliminary reference implementations CDDLM-WG. Interop CDDLM-WG and WSDM CDDLM-WG demos CDDLM and other SRM WG ACS-WG and CDDLM-WG (In addition, in agreement with ACS co-chair, they scheduled a separate session with us.) We will have a pre-meeting with OGSA prior to GGF (probably on 20th of June, more details follow) and hopefully a session with OGSA at GGF as well as with BES (Basic Execution Services) in some form I am trying to schedule this with Hiro. Thanks, Dejan.

1 0