* In section 2 (former section 3) the following text was removed: "Grid’s Virtual Organizations may contain more than one CA, so establishment of OCSP Authorized Responders between them is essential to provide an interoperable service." When we proposed such change we were thinking in the importance of highlighting the co-existence of multiples CAs into the same VO as a practical challenge for Grid OCSP. What do you think?
I don't understand what this text is aiming at. Is it only to establish the fact that we operate in an environment with multiple trust anchors and that these need to be federated through e.g. a PMA, or is there something else between the lines? "Authorized responders between them"... are you thinking of some cross-certification / bridge scenario? /Olle
* In section 2 (former section 3) the following text was removed: "Grid’s Virtual Organizations may contain more than one CA, so establishment of OCSP Authorized Responders between them is essential to provide an interoperable service." When we proposed such change we were thinking in the importance of highlighting the co-existence of multiples CAs into the same VO as a practical challenge for Grid OCSP. What do you think?
I don't understand what this text is aiming at. Is it only to establish the fact that we operate in an environment with multiple trust anchors and that these need to be federated through e.g. a PMA, or is there something else between the lines?
"Authorized responders between them"... are you thinking of some cross-certification / bridge scenario?
/Olle
Sorry for the late response but in fact we had a confusion with the concept of "Authorized Responders", so about this point we agree with Olle. Regards. -- ____________________ Jesus Luna Garcia PhD Student. Polytechnic University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain jluna@ac.upc.edu
participants (2)
-
Jesus Luna -
Olle Mulmo