Re: OCSP Requirements - CAOPS mailing list summary
This is a set of pointers to where/when OCSP discussion has taken place on the CAOPS mailing list. I think that this list is public, and easily accessible, so I will not repost it. I think the most interesting material is in the May-June block, and Jesus Luna's most recent comments at the end of Oct. More on this later. Apr 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/04/msg00001.html [MS's version of document pre GGF-14] May-June 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/05/maillist.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/06/maillist.html [All the content of the mailing list in May, and most in June, was OCSP] Sep-Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/09/msg00000.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/msg00001.html [launch of certiver-related open OCSP Java client API and OCSP service; see note below] Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/msg00097.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/msg00098.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/msg00099.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/msg00100.html [Set of comments from JL about OCSP proxy cert issues, responding to issues raised in earlier discussion & at GGF] Frank Siebenlist discussed the client API licensing with CertiVeR, and as I understand it they have agreed to change the licensing to an Apache-like license; this would allow "vendors" like Globus and perhaps other middleware packagers to incorporate and use the source code. [Or so I understand it.] There are probably some other sideways discussions that didn't take place completely or at all on the CAOPS list which could be useful. I don't think I will look any deeper but if any issue has been missed please bring it up. Thanks, ==mwh Michael Helm ESnet/LBL
Mike, The latest draft is in deed 6 months old. What's left is a resolution on recommended proxy certificate logic. To avoid any confusion, let's continue any work with the OCSP requirements draft found at http://forge.ggf.org/projects/caops-wg/ : - Click on "Document Manager" (left menubar, need to login in order to see it) - Click on "Working Drafts" (center frame) I suggest that a teleconf is organized in order to sort out what was said at GGF15. How about Monday at 18:00 UTC? (7pm central Europe, 9am US pacific) /Olle On Jan 18, 2006, at 20:00, Mike Helm wrote:
This is a set of pointers to where/when OCSP discussion has taken place on the CAOPS mailing list. I think that this list is public, and easily accessible, so I will not repost it.
I think the most interesting material is in the May-June block, and Jesus Luna's most recent comments at the end of Oct. More on this later.
Apr 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/04/ msg00001.html [MS's version of document pre GGF-14]
May-June 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/05/ maillist.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/06/ maillist.html [All the content of the mailing list in May, and most in June, was OCSP]
Sep-Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/09/ msg00000.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ msg00001.html [launch of certiver-related open OCSP Java client API and OCSP service; see note below]
Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ msg00097.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ msg00098.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ msg00099.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ msg00100.html [Set of comments from JL about OCSP proxy cert issues, responding to issues raised in earlier discussion & at GGF]
Frank Siebenlist discussed the client API licensing with CertiVeR, and as I understand it they have agreed to change the licensing to an Apache-like license; this would allow "vendors" like Globus and perhaps other middleware packagers to incorporate and use the source code. [Or so I understand it.]
There are probably some other sideways discussions that didn't take place completely or at all on the CAOPS list which could be useful. I don't think I will look any deeper but if any issue has been missed please bring it up.
Thanks, ==mwh Michael Helm ESnet/LBL
Olle Mulmo writes:
The latest draft is in deed 6 months old. What's left is a resolution on recommended proxy certificate logic.
To avoid any confusion, let's continue any work with the OCSP requirements draft found at http://forge.ggf.org/projects/caops-wg/ :
- Click on "Document Manager" (left menubar, need to login in order to see it) - Click on "Working Drafts" (center frame)
I suggest that a teleconf is organized in order to sort out what was said at GGF15. How about Monday at 18:00 UTC? (7pm central Europe, 9am US pacific)
Monday is impossible for me. I'm traveling most of that week. Tue 24 Jan should work. Also Thu 26 and Fri 27 (limited time Fri mornings). The URL for the document I posted has the same document content. There are probably people on these lists who would be interested in reading the document, but don't have logins. Thanks, ==mwh
For us the best would be to arrange this teleconference for next Tuesday at the time proposed (18:00 UTC) I will be attending the next GGF meeting in Athens. Hopefully we will be able to finish the document at that time. Thank you, Oscar
-----Mensaje original----- De: owner-caops-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-caops-wg@ggf.org] En nombre de Mike Helm Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de enero de 2006 21:56 Para: Olle Mulmo CC: caops-wg@gridforum.org; Frank Siebenlist; Lauri Anton Asunto: Re: [caops-wg] Re: OCSP Requirements - CAOPS mailing list summary
Olle Mulmo writes:
The latest draft is in deed 6 months old. What's left is a resolution on recommended proxy certificate logic.
To avoid any confusion, let's continue any work with the OCSP requirements draft found at http://forge.ggf.org/projects/caops-wg/ :
- Click on "Document Manager" (left menubar, need to login in order to see it) - Click on "Working Drafts" (center frame)
I suggest that a teleconf is organized in order to sort out what was said at GGF15. How about Monday at 18:00 UTC? (7pm central Europe, 9am US pacific)
Monday is impossible for me. I'm traveling most of that week. Tue 24 Jan should work. Also Thu 26 and Fri 27 (limited time Fri mornings).
The URL for the document I posted has the same document content. There are probably people on these lists who would be interested in reading the document, but don't have logins.
Thanks, ==mwh
Hi. Mike Helm wrote, On 18.01.2006 21:55:
Monday is impossible for me. I'm traveling most of that week. Tue 24 Jan should work. Also Thu 26 and Fri 27 (limited time Fri mornings).
Oscar Manso wrote, On 19.01.2006 12:31:
For us the best would be to arrange this teleconference for next Tuesday at the time proposed (18:00 UTC)
I'm sorry. I'm on a plane at that time (Tue). Might be able to connect Thu 26 at 18:00 UTC. Flying back Fri 27 in the evening (=unavailable again). Regards -- Milan Sova sova@cesnet.cz
On Jan 18, 2006, at 21:55, Mike Helm wrote:
The URL for the document I posted has the same document content. There are probably people on these lists who would be interested in reading the document, but don't have logins.
Then GET ONE. /O
Hello again Mike, Thank you for all your efforts in trying to get back into finishing this document. Effectively, the OGRO client license has already been changed to an Apache-like as you mentioned. Just in case, we remind you that OGRO is available at: http://globus-grid.certiver.com/info/ogro/index.html Oscar & Jesús
-----Mensaje original----- De: owner-caops-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-caops-wg@ggf.org] En nombre de Mike Helm Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de enero de 2006 20:01 Para: caops-wg@gridforum.org CC: franks@mcs.anl.gov Asunto: [caops-wg] Re: OCSP Requirements - CAOPS mailing list summary
This is a set of pointers to where/when OCSP discussion has taken place on the CAOPS mailing list. I think that this list is public, and easily accessible, so I will not repost it.
I think the most interesting material is in the May-June block, and Jesus Luna's most recent comments at the end of Oct. More on this later.
Apr 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/04/ms g00001.html [MS's version of document pre GGF-14]
May-June 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/05/ma illist.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/06/ma illist.html [All the content of the mailing list in May, and most in June, was OCSP]
Sep-Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/09/ms g00000.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00001.html [launch of certiver-related open OCSP Java client API and OCSP service; see note below]
Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00097.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00098.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00099.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00100.html [Set of comments from JL about OCSP proxy cert issues, responding to issues raised in earlier discussion & at GGF]
Frank Siebenlist discussed the client API licensing with CertiVeR, and as I understand it they have agreed to change the licensing to an Apache-like license; this would allow "vendors" like Globus and perhaps other middleware packagers to incorporate and use the source code. [Or so I understand it.]
There are probably some other sideways discussions that didn't take place completely or at all on the CAOPS list which could be useful. I don't think I will look any deeper but if any issue has been missed please bring it up.
Thanks, ==mwh Michael Helm ESnet/LBL
participants (4)
-
Mike Helm -
Milan Sova -
Olle Mulmo -
Oscar Manso