I can't remember what was agreed in Salt Lake City regarding comments for GFD.125.

That said: The emailAddress vs Email issue has just lit up again on a UK mailing list.

Do we have the opportunity for, and should we consider, strengthening the SHOULD NOT use emailaddress in subject names to a MUST NOT?

It's still "deprecated but permitted" in the replacement of RFC3280 by RFC5280.

Mike

On Monday 31 January 2011 08:01:05 Alan Sill wrote:

> Hi David and the CAOps group,

>

> I'd like to suggest that we think collectively about the considerations

> that have led us to put forward the very useful and by now quite mature

> CAOPs document GFD.125 as a "COmmunity Practice" document and not as a

> proposed recommendation. I understand that historically, there was some

> thought that this profile might not represent a collection of items that

> ought to be standardized, but I think that experience has shown most of

> its content to be important, if not essential.

>

> With this in mind, I'd like to raise the issue of whether this quite mature

> document, or another one quite close to it in intent, might be worth

> putting forward into the stream as a proposed recommendation. To go from

> a proposed to a full recommendation would take the passage of some time

> and demonstration of multiple implementations; I am willing to consider

> the multiple adoptions of GFD.125 by CAs throughout the world as

> implementations for this purpose.

>

> There may be other points of view, but now is the time to discuss them, I

> think, and so would like to ask for your input.

>

> Thanks,

> Alan

> --

> caops-wg mailing list

> caops-wg@ogf.org

> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/caops-wg