Dear all, Working with Matt, we have revised the auditing guidelines document. I also compared the TAGPMA spreadsheet and the auditing document. Here is the summary of the revision: - Added one auditing item (item# CA-(23)). - Moved item# CA-(30) to item# CA-(52). - Added Matt as a co-author. - Revised English. BTW, Christos gave us the following comment at the last OGF: The document should provide a generic framework for performing audits on Grid IdPs. We should remove any statements on the preferred answers for each question in the document. Actually, sections 1, 2, and 4 describe a generic framework. These sections are not profile-specific but common for all profiles. However, Section 3, "Auditing Checklist," is derived from and depend on the Classic AP. Section 3 should be different for the other profiles such as SLCS. Even so, should I modify profile-specific questions and descriptions to more generic descriptions? Any comments are appreciated. Regarding the comparison with the TAGPMA spreadsheet and the auditing document, here is the summary of the results: - One item in the spreadsheet was not in the auditing document. - new item #CA-(23) - Some items in the auditing document are not in the spreadsheet. - Most items are "SHOULD" statement. - Some of such items are newly added in Classic AP 4.1. - Item numbers which are not in the spreadsheet. - #CA-(14) - #CA-(21) - #CA-(31) - #CA-(39) - #CA-(43) - #CA-(44) - #CA-(45) - #CA-(49) - #CA-(59) - #RA-(4) - #RA-(8) Thanks, -- Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka@aist.go.jp) http://ninf.apgrid.org/ http://www.apgridpma.org/