Hello again Mike, Thank you for all your efforts in trying to get back into finishing this document. Effectively, the OGRO client license has already been changed to an Apache-like as you mentioned. Just in case, we remind you that OGRO is available at: http://globus-grid.certiver.com/info/ogro/index.html Oscar & Jesús
-----Mensaje original----- De: owner-caops-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-caops-wg@ggf.org] En nombre de Mike Helm Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de enero de 2006 20:01 Para: caops-wg@gridforum.org CC: franks@mcs.anl.gov Asunto: [caops-wg] Re: OCSP Requirements - CAOPS mailing list summary
This is a set of pointers to where/when OCSP discussion has taken place on the CAOPS mailing list. I think that this list is public, and easily accessible, so I will not repost it.
I think the most interesting material is in the May-June block, and Jesus Luna's most recent comments at the end of Oct. More on this later.
Apr 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/04/ms g00001.html [MS's version of document pre GGF-14]
May-June 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/05/ma illist.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/06/ma illist.html [All the content of the mailing list in May, and most in June, was OCSP]
Sep-Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/09/ms g00000.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00001.html [launch of certiver-related open OCSP Java client API and OCSP service; see note below]
Oct 2005 http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00097.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00098.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00099.html http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/caops-wg/2005/10/ms g00100.html [Set of comments from JL about OCSP proxy cert issues, responding to issues raised in earlier discussion & at GGF]
Frank Siebenlist discussed the client API licensing with CertiVeR, and as I understand it they have agreed to change the licensing to an Apache-like license; this would allow "vendors" like Globus and perhaps other middleware packagers to incorporate and use the source code. [Or so I understand it.]
There are probably some other sideways discussions that didn't take place completely or at all on the CAOPS list which could be useful. I don't think I will look any deeper but if any issue has been missed please bring it up.
Thanks, ==mwh Michael Helm ESnet/LBL