So, which document, in what form, and what is the current draft? Olle Mulmo writes:
Mike,
The major conclusion from the CAOPS sessions in regards to OCSP is that we do not have consensus or know-how in regards to proxy certificates, and so therefore (most) people agreed to simply list them as an outstanding issue at this point in time, and then let this document onwards in the publication pipeline.
Hopefully the minutes will cover the discussions in more details.
/Olle
On Feb 21, 2006, at 21:01, Mike Helm wrote:
I was talking to Frank Siebenlist of Argonne & Globus, and he is interested in taking on some of the client side issues in the OCSP Requiremets paper & making sure they are properly addressed. This is something he and Von Welch, in another context, have emphasized as being very important for OCSP and similar services. This attention & input should be very useful.
What was the discussion at CAOPS at GGF-16? I haven't seen any minutes or feedback.
Thanks, ==mwh Michael Helm ESnet/LBL