I wanted to talk about TAGPMA charter use of the word "develop"; I don't think I stated my case very well yesterday. I'm using an older draft & I know some changes are in the offing but I don't think they invalidate this comment. There is a gradual escalation in the meaning of "develop" from the beginning of the charter, from this (p2 or 3) It will be the mission of the TAGPMA to develop and maintain published information on the trustworthiness of its member authentication service providers. To this p5, 2.2 The TAGPMA will develop Authentication Service profiles that reflect our community's requirements. With a couple stops in between. (1) As a practical matter, I don't see how TAGPMA can do this kind of development in 2.2. Members or prospective members can develop, and bring these new ideas in, but TAGPMA isn't a supported project. Now, I think it might be a good idea for such efforts to be supported - is that what is intended for this PMA? Will be making a roadmap &c? (2) As a matter of trust management, do you want the developer to be the approver / accreditor too? I think you'd want to have a little more impartiality in the TAGPMA / review side of the relationship (imagine making the town building inspector and real estate developer the same person). I think the earlier language was better - "foster development" &c, and something migth be needed here to say how innovations get let in. Unless #1 above is really what is wanted here.