Re: [Ari-wg] Ari-wg Digest, Vol 5, Issue 4
Hi, a few comments on the document... First a general one: I believe that we need much more (content) and I'm worried we are not really able to provide it at the present moment. In motivation we mention "Instrumentation as a service" that would allow composing experimental actions "irrelevant of the location of the cooperating instruments." I have heard this statement before but I still cannot envision a use case that would fit it. We mention again the GTCP which is dead at least 4 or 5 years now as far as I know. Best regards, Milan On 05/26/2011 07:00 PM, ari-wg-request@ogf.org wrote:
Send Ari-wg mailing list submissions to ari-wg@ogf.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ari-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ari-wg-request@ogf.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ari-wg-owner@ogf.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ari-wg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: initial version for the discussion (Marcin Plociennik)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:58:34 +0200 From: Marcin Plociennik<marcinp@man.poznan.pl> Subject: Re: [Ari-wg] initial version for the discussion To: ari-wg@ogf.org Message-ID:<4DDE082A.3040807@man.poznan.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
There was problem with attachment, so I had put it on the web
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.ari-wg/doc...
regards marcin
W dniu 2011-05-24 12:19, Marcin Plociennik pisze:
Dear All,
We agreed in February with the general structure of the draft specification document. We planned to present first base (Milan, Marcin, Duane) for the discussion in March/April, but this has been delayed a bit (and there was not much activity in this period).
Please find attached the document with the initial propositions , that are basing on the Instrument Element interfaces (thanks to Milan).
I think we should go discuss section by section from the scope, use cases till the service interfaces propostion.
Any comments/suggestions/inputs are welcomed. I hope this will be good starting point for the further work on the document.
Concerning next possible meeting, from the discussion with you I know that there are limited travelling possibilities in the near future, so I suggest for now to work by mail, maybe organising telco next month (Skype or Evo). I will send separate mail to check possibilities
best regards marcin
_______________________________________________ Ari-wg mailing list Ari-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ari-wg
-- ________________________________________ Milan Prica Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A. Area Science Park, S.S. 14, km 163,5 34149 Basovizza (Trieste), Italy Tel: (+39) 040-375-8497 http://www.elettra.trieste.it/ ________________________________________
Hi Milan, some comments from my side W dniu 2011-06-13 17:50, Milan Prica pisze:
Hi, a few comments on the document...
First a general one: I believe that we need much more (content) and I'm worried we are not really able to provide it at the present moment. I agree that there is still lot of work to be done. All of the inputs are very welcome;) In motivation we mention "Instrumentation as a service" that would allow composing experimental actions "irrelevant of the location of the cooperating instruments." I have heard this statement before but I still cannot envision a use case that would fit it.
We mention again the GTCP which is dead at least 4 or 5 years now as far as I know. ok, so it's better to remove it probably.
Best regards,
Milan
On 05/26/2011 07:00 PM, ari-wg-request@ogf.org wrote:
Send Ari-wg mailing list submissions to ari-wg@ogf.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ari-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ari-wg-request@ogf.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ari-wg-owner@ogf.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ari-wg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: initial version for the discussion (Marcin Plociennik)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:58:34 +0200 From: Marcin Plociennik<marcinp@man.poznan.pl> Subject: Re: [Ari-wg] initial version for the discussion To: ari-wg@ogf.org Message-ID:<4DDE082A.3040807@man.poznan.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
There was problem with attachment, so I had put it on the web
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.ari-wg/doc...
regards marcin
W dniu 2011-05-24 12:19, Marcin Plociennik pisze:
Dear All,
We agreed in February with the general structure of the draft specification document. We planned to present first base (Milan, Marcin, Duane) for the discussion in March/April, but this has been delayed a bit (and there was not much activity in this period).
Please find attached the document with the initial propositions , that are basing on the Instrument Element interfaces (thanks to Milan).
I think we should go discuss section by section from the scope, use cases till the service interfaces propostion.
Any comments/suggestions/inputs are welcomed. I hope this will be good starting point for the further work on the document.
Concerning next possible meeting, from the discussion with you I know that there are limited travelling possibilities in the near future, so I suggest for now to work by mail, maybe organising telco next month (Skype or Evo). I will send separate mail to check possibilities
best regards marcin
_______________________________________________ Ari-wg mailing list Ari-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ari-wg
-- Marcin Plociennik Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center 61-704 Poznan, ul. Noskowskiego 10 POLAND phone (+48 61) 8582181 e-mail: marcinp@man.poznan.pl
participants (2)
-
Marcin Plociennik -
Milan Prica