Mike, et al, I have registered the last doc in the "Current Draft" on the GridForge. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/acs-wg/document/draft-ggf-acs-spec-0.1/... As we discussed, we will update this by GGF15. -Keisuke
Hi all, Attached is a proposal draft of section 3.1. Please review this and make comment. Thank you. Sachiko At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:57:11 +0900, fukui wrote:
Mike, et al,
I have registered the last doc in the "Current Draft" on the GridForge.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/acs-wg/document/draft-ggf-acs-spec-0.1/...
As we discussed, we will update this by GGF15.
-Keisuke
Thanks! Looks nice. I have a comment about the relationship between AAD and SDD. I believe we considered stating that the AAD would be a SDD compliant document, extending it as needed for ACS specific elements. Did we reach a consensus on this? Perhaps we can discuss this tonight? Sachiko Wada wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is a proposal draft of section 3.1. Please review this and make comment.
Thank you. Sachiko
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:57:11 +0900, fukui wrote:
Mike, et al,
I have registered the last doc in the "Current Draft" on the GridForge.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/acs-wg/document/draft-ggf-acs-spec-0.1/...
As we discussed, we will update this by GGF15.
-Keisuke
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Michael Behrens R2AD, LLC (571) 594-3008 (cell) *new* (703) 714-0442 (land)
Hi Mike, I'm sorry I missed your comment on this at the call. I remember that we discussed about extending SDD schema to make ACS AAD compliant with it in the review of the use case description for SDD TC. A requirement for SDD TC is described and I have explained it earlier today at the SDD TC Teleconference. My post on the SDD TC can be viewed from below link: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sdd/documents.php?close_folder_... As for stating that in our spec document, in my opinion, it is better avoiding that. Indeed there is no doubt about our intention, but we have no commitment from SDD TC members that it will accommodate AAD as an extension or will provide an extension point for that purpose. -Keisuke Michael Behrens wrote:
Thanks! Looks nice.
I have a comment about the relationship between AAD and SDD. I believe we considered stating that the AAD would be a SDD compliant document, extending it as needed for ACS specific elements. Did we reach a consensus on this? Perhaps we can discuss this tonight?
Diagram is grouped now. Sachiko Wada wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is a proposal draft of section 3.1. Please review this and make comment.
Thank you. Sachiko
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:57:11 +0900, fukui wrote:
Mike, et al,
I have registered the last doc in the "Current Draft" on the GridForge.
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/acs-wg/document/draft-ggf-acs-spec-0.1/...
As we discussed, we will update this by GGF15.
-Keisuke
------------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
Keisuke Fukui -
Michael Behrens -
Sachiko Wada