Keisuke Fukui wrote:
Folks,
Here is an agenda for the call tomorrow. See you there!
### Proposed Agenda
1. Agenda bashing, role call, note taker & time keeper. (10min) 2. Wrap up for F2F (15 min) Review action items list and issues list (updated and attached) Decide the deadlines. KF will register them on tracker once approved. Goal: Confirm who and what by GGF14. 3. Updates (15 min) SDD TC call by KF. CDDLM interface, if any.. 4. Wrap up. (5 min)
### Logistics for the call Date & Time: Jun 2 Thu 20:00 EDT / Jun 3 Fri 9:00 JST Dial-in Number: 1-831-600-1000 (Santa Cruz, California) Participant Access Code: 7771111
-Keisuke
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Issues on the ACS specification. (Rev. 20050523d2) Date: May 23, 2005 Created by: Keisuke Fukui
- Clarify the requirements on version control. - Demonstrate the recommended interface between ACS and CDDLM - 'addFile' interface in the deployment API looks to be a candidate contact point with ACS, for example, "register" interface of ARI. - where the ACS interfaces should stand in the CDDLM's lifecycle model. AI-1: Sachiko, to post the proposed sequence for interaction with CDDLM. AI-2: All, to make comment on the sequence with CDDLM. AI-3: Tom, to propose a name for ARI interfaces (functions) - Demonstrate the recommended interface between ACS and NAREGI type deployment engine. i.e. separate archives for different binary from the same source code, or in multiple binaries in a single archive. conclusion: flat description of the archive will work. AI-4: Tom, to send a SDD hierarchy info to NAREGI PSE team. - Decide the detail service interface for ACS (ARI). - Find the interoperability target and scope in other grid activity. e.g. EGEE, omii, etc. We need a research on possibilities. conclusion: pursue only when European grid is OGSA based. - Find appropriate candidates for reference implementations. AI-5: Tom, to ask David Martin about reference implementation. - Collect use case descriptions to be shown in the spec. conclusion: Current one is suffice. AI-6: All, to review the current draft of the ACS specification . - Find values and issues in storing (caching) the input and output data pairs through the lifecycle of the multiple executions of the application. conclusion: postponed. - Decide the minimum set of requirements on security specification in ACS. AI-7: Mike, to make a research on authentication/authorization. AI-8: Pete, to make a research on signature/integrity. - Find the appropriate level of the security description in ACS specification regarding to overview, requirements and/or normative specifications. See above. - Define the relationship of the SDD specification and ACS specification AI-9: Tom, to update the section of AAF in the current draft of the ACS spec. - Converge the Archive Descriptor schema into IUDD schema in SDD TC. See above. - Define the collaborate with OASIS SDD TC. - Archive standard will be output from SDD standardization. How can we contribute to it, to archive the common format for the grid deployment. Probably we should discuss Grid specific consideration at ACS, then report our outcome to the SDD TC. See above. - Repository interface standard for Grid system will be output from GGF ACS. - Define the collaboration with other (expected) GGF WGs such as OGSA design teams. BEM?
Open Issues in Strawman Draft of the ACS Spec.
- More appropriate name and its abbreviation for Application Archive (AA). [3.1 Definition of Application Archive] - Details of Register interface, and method of uploading the entity to be registered. [5.1.1 Register] - Details of Remove interface. [5.2.2 Remove] - How to specify the Application Content in getContent interface. [5.2.3 GetContent] - Whether the putContent interface is necessary or not. [5.2.4 PutContent] - Details of events. [5.3.1 event of AA updating and 5.3.2 event of AA deletion] - List up and details of types of Application Contents. [6.4 Application Contents] - Clean up the relationship with DCML. [7.3.1 DCML] - Details of security [8 Security Consideration] - Details of samples [9 Samples] - Details of schema definition [10 Schema Definition]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Action Items (Rev. 20050523d2) Date: May 23, 2005 Created by: Keisuke Fukui
From the "Issues List": AI-1: Sachiko, to post the proposed sequence for interaction with CDDLM. AI-2: All, to make comment on the sequence with CDDLM. AI-3: Tom, to propose a name for ARI interfaces (functions) AI-4: Tom, to send a SDD hierarchy info to NAREGI PSE team. AI-5: Tom, to ask David Martin about reference implementation. AI-6: All, to review the current draft of the ACS specification . AI-7: Mike, to make a research on authentication/authorization. AI-8: Pete, to make a research on signature/integrity. AI-9: Tom, to update the section of AAF in the current draft of the ACS spec.
From minutes: AI-10: Fukui, to send the request for two sessions in GGF14 by June 3. AI-11: Fukui, to add "Clarify the requirements on version control" to the issues list. AI-12: Fukui, to check the possibility of a joint session with CDDLM-WG at GGF14. AI-13: Fukui, to register the reviewed draft of the ACS spec. by May 27.