Hi Keisuke, I agree we need requirements analysis and the use cases. Especially, the use cases are indispensable for explaining what we are aiming for. I know Keisuke and I have a CDC (commercial data center) use case and Pete wrote a grid appliances use case on the former acs-bof ml. Also, I think "the ability to replicate/synchronize", which Pete mentioned a while back in the course of the requirements discussion, is one of the interesting usages of ACS. What else do we have? As for the issues for GGF13, in addition to Keisuke's list, I am concerned about the relationship with the other WGs (especially with CDDLM-WG and OGSA-WG) since We must cooperate with them to achieve our use case goal. Sachiko Wada At Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:12:08 +0900, Keisuke Fukui wrote:
Folks,
Since the ACS-WG is officially approved, I hope we can meet at the ACS sessions at GGF13 in Seoul!
I'd like to discuss about our future plan. I think we need think about the below issues for GGF13:
- Requirements refinement (including relationship to the Solution Installation) - Usecase collection - Verifing of the Milestones and Charter - Plenary session to recruit extra people to join - Prior recruiting for the ACS-WG session itself
In addition, some logistics for GGF13 need to be found out, such as Session Plan, inviting the speakers; I guess we need expertise from security and data transport area to refine our requirements. Also, we'd like collect fair number of the usecases to justify our requirement analysis.
Having a conference call about this may accelerate the discussion, though the comments on the mailing list are also welcomed. Please let me know your idea about these. And I expect all of you can meet at the GGF13!
-Keisuke Fukui