Re: [acs-wg] Issues list on tracker

Thanks Mike for a heads up, I put it there because I remember, in the last F2F, there was an opinion that the current use case in the spec. document is sufficient and doesn't require any further collection of them. However, the priority here doesn't block discussing or adding use cases. We can move it into among high priorities if we are sure of pursuing more on this by GGF14. I share your opinion that the use case is important. -Keisuke Michael Behrens wrote:

Thanks Keisuke! I suggest that 1528 should be a higher priority as our process is use-case driven. Maybe it should be the same as # 1530, pri-2.

Keisuke Fukui wrote:

...

Folks,

As discussed in this week's call, I have added artifacts to "Issues in spec." tracker. Please take a look if they are correct in priority and their contents.

https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=147&atid=805&filter=&f_artifact_id=&f_priority=&f_assigned_to=&f_artifact_status=&f_category=&f_artifact_group=&group_id=147&atid=805&sort0=priority

Those who can take response of items, please help yourself to get assignments:-)

FYI, I added each item as shown in the F2F output except for the "Open Issues in Strawman Draft of the ACS Spec."; for these, I have omitted some duplicate and outdated items.

Have fun! -Keisuke